On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 18:33:38 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
> This is almost ready to push to trunk, but there are a couple of extra
> tasks needed to be done:
Done.
Please find the attached v3 patch and let me know if something needs to
be changed/added.
Thanks!
Regards,
Avinash Sonawane (root
On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 11:47 +0530, Avinash Sonawane wrote:
> Apologies! Forgot to attach the patch v2.
>
> Done now.
Thanks for the patch! (forgetting to attach it is something of a rite
of passage)
The content of the v2 patch looks good to me; I tried regenerating the
manpage and I think it's a
Apologies! Forgot to attach the patch v2.
Done now.
>From 1d986ffd8b20007a6a2140e50935ade1bebc2228 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Avinash Sonawane
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 07:32:44 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] Docs: Document that taint analyzer checker disables some
warnings
---
gcc/doc/invoke.texi |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:15:02 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
> So it would be even better if the text listed the warnings that are
> affected by this: basically all of the ones that are implemented in
> checkers i.e. analyzer/sm-*.cc (apart from sm-taint, of course).
Done! I could find 13 warnings in
On Tue, 2022-03-22 at 23:43 +0530, Avinash Sonawane via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> $ man gcc says that "Some checkers are disabled by default (even with
> -fanalyzer), such as the "taint" checker that implements
> -Wanalyzer-tainted-array-index, and this option is required to enable
> them."
)
https://www.rootkea.me
>From 764baac8ffed188d50293f0991ab43c97b63cc8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Avinash Sonawane
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 07:32:44 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] Docs: Document that taint analyzer checker stops other
checkers
---
gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
d
