On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:15:02 -0400 David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> So it would be even better if the text listed the warnings that are > affected by this: basically all of the ones that are implemented in > checkers i.e. analyzer/sm-*.cc (apart from sm-taint, of course). Done! I could find 13 warnings in analyzer/sm-*.cc. Hope I didn't miss any. :) I also rearranged some flags to maintain the sort order. Please find the attached v2 of the patch. Should I post another fresh mail with subject line "[PATCH v2] Docs:..."? Or should've the subject of this current thread been edited to "[PATCH v2]" from "[PATCH]"? Sorry for bothering. This is my first time submitting the patch on a mailing list. :) Thanks! Regards, Avinash Sonawane (rootKea) https://www.rootkea.me
