Re: PING^2 [PATCH] Adjust the symbol for SECTION_LINK_ORDER linked_to section [PR99889]

Hi Fangrui, on 2023/7/19 14:33, Fangrui Song wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 7:26 PM Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches > wrote: >> >> Hi Richard, >> >> on 2022/11/23 00:08, Richard Sandiford wrote: >>> "Kewen.Lin" writes: Hi Richard, Many thanks for your review comments! >>> on

Re: PING^2 [PATCH] Adjust the symbol for SECTION_LINK_ORDER linked_to section [PR99889]

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 7:26 PM Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > on 2022/11/23 00:08, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > "Kewen.Lin" writes: > >> Hi Richard, > >> > >> Many thanks for your review comments! > >> > > on 2022/8/24 16:17, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: > >> Hi

Re: PING^2 [PATCH] Adjust the symbol for SECTION_LINK_ORDER linked_to section [PR99889]

Hi Richard, on 2022/11/23 00:08, Richard Sandiford wrote: > "Kewen.Lin" writes: >> Hi Richard, >> >> Many thanks for your review comments! >> > on 2022/8/24 16:17, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As discussed in PR98125, -fpatchable-function-entry with >> SECTION

Re: PING^2 [PATCH] Adjust the symbol for SECTION_LINK_ORDER linked_to section [PR99889]

"Kewen.Lin" writes: > Hi Richard, > > Many thanks for your review comments! > on 2022/8/24 16:17, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: > Hi, > > As discussed in PR98125, -fpatchable-function-entry with > SECTION_LINK_ORDER support doesn't work well on powerpc64 > ELFv1 because

Re: PING^2 [PATCH] Adjust the symbol for SECTION_LINK_ORDER linked_to section [PR99889]

Hi Richard, Many thanks for your review comments! >>> on 2022/8/24 16:17, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: Hi, As discussed in PR98125, -fpatchable-function-entry with SECTION_LINK_ORDER support doesn't work well on powerpc64 ELFv1 because the filled "Symbol" in

Re: PING^2 [PATCH] Adjust the symbol for SECTION_LINK_ORDER linked_to section [PR99889]

"Kewen.Lin" writes: > Hi, > > Gentle ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-August/600190.html > > Any comments are highly appreciated. > > BR, > Kewen > > on 2022/9/28 13:41, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Gentle ping: >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/20

PING^2 [PATCH] Adjust the symbol for SECTION_LINK_ORDER linked_to section [PR99889]

Hi, Gentle ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-August/600190.html Any comments are highly appreciated. BR, Kewen on 2022/9/28 13:41, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: > Hi, > > Gentle ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-August/600190.html > > BR, > Kewen > >

Re: [PATCH] Adjust the symbol for SECTION_LINK_ORDER linked_to section [PR99889]

On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 08:47:53PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote: > on 2022/9/30 04:31, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > Please don't define TARGET_ASM_PRINT_PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY at all, > > instead, and remove this whole function? > > This hook is still needed for "ELFv2 support rework" which > was jus

Re: [PATCH] Adjust the symbol for SECTION_LINK_ORDER linked_to section [PR99889]

Hi Segher, on 2022/9/30 04:31, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 04:17:07PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote: >> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc >> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc >> @@ -14771,18 +14771,9 @@ rs6000_print_patchable_function_entry (FILE *file, >>

Re: [PATCH] Adjust the symbol for SECTION_LINK_ORDER linked_to section [PR99889]

Hi! On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 04:17:07PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote: > --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc > +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc > @@ -14771,18 +14771,9 @@ rs6000_print_patchable_function_entry (FILE *file, > unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT patch_area_size, >

PING^1 [PATCH] Adjust the symbol for SECTION_LINK_ORDER linked_to section [PR99889]

Hi, Gentle ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-August/600190.html BR, Kewen on 2022/8/24 16:17, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: > Hi, > > As discussed in PR98125, -fpatchable-function-entry with > SECTION_LINK_ORDER support doesn't work well on powerpc64 > ELFv1 because the fi

[PATCH] Adjust the symbol for SECTION_LINK_ORDER linked_to section [PR99889]

Hi, As discussed in PR98125, -fpatchable-function-entry with SECTION_LINK_ORDER support doesn't work well on powerpc64 ELFv1 because the filled "Symbol" in .section name,"flags"o,@type,Symbol sits in .opd section instead of in the function_section like .text or named .text*. Since we already