Re: [PATCH] Adjust string_constant to new STRING_CST semantics

2018-09-13 Thread Jeff Law
On 8/24/18 3:24 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that the latest patches to make STRING_CST > semantics for literals and for initializers consistent > also fixes PR 86711 and PR 86714 (but not PR 87053). > > The code change in the string_constant does not change > any test case, the

[PATCH] Adjust string_constant to new STRING_CST semantics

2018-08-24 Thread Bernd Edlinger
Hi, I noticed that the latest patches to make STRING_CST semantics for literals and for initializers consistent also fixes PR 86711 and PR 86714 (but not PR 87053). The code change in the string_constant does not change any test case, the new test cases are already fixed once we have the unified