On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> If you want to do anything about it, instead hack up the ABI list checker,
> so that for configurations with disabled TLS it ignores TLS symbols in the
> ABI list, then they can be added on all architectures.
Is anyone actually using current GCC for non
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 04:23:17PM +0300, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> I have been trying to figure out why I constantly get 2 extra TLS symbols in
> my aarch64-linux-gnu libstdc++ ABI tests, and it turned out to be due to
> support for non-TLS toolchain -- as discussed here [*].
>
> However, as far
Hi,
I have been trying to figure out why I constantly get 2 extra TLS symbols in my
aarch64-linux-gnu libstdc++ ABI tests, and it turned out to be due to support
for non-TLS toolchain -- as discussed here [*].
However, as far as I understand, aarch64-linux-gnu postdates NPTL
implementation, so
