On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > If you want to do anything about it, instead hack up the ABI list checker, > so that for configurations with disabled TLS it ignores TLS symbols in the > ABI list, then they can be added on all architectures.
Is anyone actually using current GCC for non-TLS configurations of glibc versions so old as to support it (2.3 and earlier?), and does current libstdc++ actually build with such old glibc? If they are, it seems to me like it should be for the people doing so to implement the conditional handling of TLS in these tests if they want them to pass; the baselines should have what's right for normal configurations (i.e. including TLS). (There may well be people using non-glibc libraries such as uClibc without TLS, but I'd expect those to need separate baselines anyway because of e.g. locale differences.) -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
