On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Michael Meissner
wrote:
> This patch is the new patch from the last submission. It sets up a hook so
> that
> the compiler will not allow IBM extended double and IEEE 128-bit floating
> point
> to intermix in a binary expression without using an explicit conversi
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 08:05:58PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Michael Meissner wrote:
>
> > This patch is the new patch from the last submission. It sets up a hook so
> > that
> > the compiler will not allow IBM extended double and IEEE 128-bit floating
> > point
> > to in
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Michael Meissner wrote:
> This patch is the new patch from the last submission. It sets up a hook so
> that
> the compiler will not allow IBM extended double and IEEE 128-bit floating
> point
> to intermix in a binary expression without using an explicit conversion.
I don't
This patch is the new patch from the last submission. It sets up a hook so that
the compiler will not allow IBM extended double and IEEE 128-bit floating point
to intermix in a binary expression without using an explicit conversion.
I have built the compiler with this patch and the previous subpat
