On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 08:05:58PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Michael Meissner wrote:
> 
> > This patch is the new patch from the last submission. It sets up a hook so 
> > that
> > the compiler will not allow IBM extended double and IEEE 128-bit floating 
> > point
> > to intermix in a binary expression without using an explicit conversion.
> 
> I don't see a testcase that this mixing is rejected.  And I'd have 
> expected you to need a C/C++ front-end patch to cause rejection in 
> conditional expressions, which don't seem currently to have such a hook, 
> but didn't see that in this series - is it intended for a patch after #7?

I am planning on writing the test cases, but I couldn't write them until all
of the sub-patches for patch #7 are in place.

I am planning on looking at a new hook for ?: next week.

-- 
Michael Meissner, IBM
IBM, M/S 2506R, 550 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460-6245, USA
email: meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com, phone: +1 (978) 899-4797

Reply via email to