On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 08:05:58PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Michael Meissner wrote: > > > This patch is the new patch from the last submission. It sets up a hook so > > that > > the compiler will not allow IBM extended double and IEEE 128-bit floating > > point > > to intermix in a binary expression without using an explicit conversion. > > I don't see a testcase that this mixing is rejected. And I'd have > expected you to need a C/C++ front-end patch to cause rejection in > conditional expressions, which don't seem currently to have such a hook, > but didn't see that in this series - is it intended for a patch after #7?
I am planning on writing the test cases, but I couldn't write them until all of the sub-patches for patch #7 are in place. I am planning on looking at a new hook for ?: next week. -- Michael Meissner, IBM IBM, M/S 2506R, 550 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460-6245, USA email: meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com, phone: +1 (978) 899-4797