> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 9:14 PM
> On 04/30/2015 09:34 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.
[RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment value
> to output_constant_pool_2
>
> On 04/29/2015 04:30 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
> >>
> >
> > Jeff, I have made the changes as per your comments and attached the
> patch.
> > If the p
[RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment value
> to output_constant_pool_2
>
> On 04/28/2015 12:38 PM, rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
> >> Sent:
Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment value
>to output_constant_pool_2
>
>On 04/28/2015 03:44 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
>> Ping.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502
>> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 7:57
> .data.rel.ro.local entries.
>
> Rohit,
>
> The subject line and thread may confuse people that this is a PowerPC-
> specific issue. You need approval from a reviewer with authority over
> varasm.c.
>
> Thanks, David
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:54 AM, roh
gt; The subject line and thread may confuse people that this is a PowerPC-
> specific issue. You need approval from a reviewer with authority over
> varasm.c.
>
> Thanks, David
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:54 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com
> wrote:
> >>
> -Original Message-
> From: Maciej W. Rozycki [mailto:ma...@codesourcery.com]
> To: Ulrich Weigand
> Cc: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502; Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797; David Edelsohn; gcc-
> patc...@gcc.gnu.org; Alan Modra; Jakub Jelinek
> Subject: Re: [RFC: Patch, PR 60102] [4.9/4.10 Regression] power
> From: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502
> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 3:54 PM
>
> > From: Ulrich Weigand [mailto:uweig...@de.ibm.com] Maciej W. Rozycki
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, 4 Aug 2014, Edmar wrote:
> > >
> > > > Committed on trunk, revision 213596 Committed on 4.9 branch,
> > > > revision 213597
>
> From: Ulrich Weigand [mailto:uweig...@de.ibm.com]
> Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Aug 2014, Edmar wrote:
> >
> > > Committed on trunk, revision 213596
> > > Committed on 4.9 branch, revision 213597
> >
> > This change regressed GDB for e500v2 multilibs, presumably because it
> > does
Jakub,
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 11:51:34AM -0500, Edmar wrote:
> > Committed on trunk, revision 213596
> > Committed on 4.9 branch, revision 213597
>
> Note the ChangeLog entry was grossly misformated.
> I've fixed it up in gcc/ChangeLog on the trunk, but not on the branch
> nor in libgcc. The
Jakub,
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 06:03:56PM +0000, rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
> > PR target/60102
>
> --- libgcc/config/rs6000/linux-unwind.h (revision 213110)
> +++ libgcc/config/rs6000/linux-unwind.h (working copy)
> @@ -274,8 +274,8 @@ ppc_fallback_frame_
Hello Ulrich,
Thanks.
> > /* Use gcc hard register numbering for eh_frame. */ -#define
> >DWARF_FRAME_REGNUM(REGNO) (REGNO)
> >+#define DWARF_FRAME_REGNUM(REGNO) \
> >+ ((REGNO) >= FIRST_SPE_HIGH_REGNO ? ((REGNO) -
> FIRST_SPE_HIGH_REGNO +
> >+1200) : (REGNO))
>
> Any reason for not using SPE_
Ulrich,
Thanks for your comments, I have updated the patch accordingly.
> > /* The SPE has an additional 32 synthetic registers, with DWARF debug
> > info numbering for these registers starting at 1200. While
> > eh_frame @@ -951,13 +952,14 @@ enum data_align { align_abi, align_opt,
> >
Ping!
> -Original Message-
> From: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502
> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 8:13 AM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797; dje@gmail.com; Alan Modra; Jakub Jelinek
> Subject: [RFC: Patch, PR 60102] [4.9/4.10 Regression] powerpc fp-bit ices at
> dwf_re
Hello All,
This is related to the following bug:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60102
I have tried to fix the e500v2 build on GCC v4.9.0 with the attached patch.
Can you please review and comment on the changes especially DWARF_FRAME_REGNUM,
DWARF_REG_TO_UNWIND_COLUMN definitions?
over
> varasm.c.
>
> Thanks, David
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:54 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com
> wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Alan Modra [mailto:amo...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 11:52 AM
> >>
fixup sections for
> .data.rel.ro.local entries.
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 02:57:38PM +, rohitarul...@freescale.com
> wrote:
> > Source file: gcc-4.8.2/gcc/varasm.c
> > @@ -7120,7 +7120,7 @@
> >if (CONSTANT_POOL_ADDRESS_P (symbol))
> >
Hello All,
This is related to the following bug:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60158
Test case: Refer below
Target: e500v2
Command line options: -Os -fdata-sections -fpic -mrelocatable -mno-spe
Notes:
GCC v4.7.3 puts the address of "abc" into the GOT directly
GCC v
18 matches
Mail list logo
