>-----Original Message----- >From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] >Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:48 PM >To: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rguent...@suse.de; Jakub >Jelinek >Cc: Alan Modra; David Edelsohn; Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797 >Subject: Re: [RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment value >to output_constant_pool_2 > >On 04/28/2015 03:44 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote: >> Ping. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502 >> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 7:57 PM >> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rguent...@suse.de; Jakub Jelinek >> Cc: Alan Modra; David Edelsohn; Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797; Dharmakan >> Rohit-B30502 > >Subject: RE: [RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment > >value to output_constant_pool_2 >> >> Hi, >> >> I would like to resubmit these patches for comments. The previous detailed >> discussion is available in the below mentioned link. >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01679.html >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00489.html >> >> The issue is still reproducible on GCC v4.8 branch. >> >> I have tested both the attached patches with e500v2 tool chain on GCC v4.8 >> branch [rev 221667] and GCC trunk [rev 221310] with no regressions. >> >> Patch1 [gcc.fix_pr60158_fixup_table_fsf_1]: Pass actual alignment value to >> output_constant_pool_2. >> Patch2 [gcc.fix_pr60158_fixup_table_fsf_2]: Use the alignment data available >> in the first argument (constant_descriptor_rtx) of output_constant_pool_1. >> (Note: this generates ".align" directive twice). >Are you asking for both patches to be applied or just one? Just one, needed your comments on which would be better.
Regards, Rohit
