From: Nicholas Krause
This fixes the PR95672 by adding the missing TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION case in
cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic in order to avoid ICES on diagnosing
incomplete template pack expansion cases. In v2, add the missing required
test case for all new patches. v3 Fixes both the test case
From: Nicholas Krause
This fixs the PR95672 by adding the missing TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION case in
cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic in order to avoid ICES on diagnosing
incomplete template pack expansion cases. In v2, add the missing required
test case for all new patches. v3 Fixes both the test case
On 6/22/20 10:01 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 09:42:51PM -0400, Nicholas Krause via Gcc-patches wrote:
From: Nicholas Krause
This fixs the PR95672 by adding the missing TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION case in
cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic in order to avoid ICES on diagnosing
From: Nicholas Krause
This fixs the PR95672 by adding the missing TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION case in
cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic in order to avoid ICES on diagnosing
incomplete template pack expansion cases. In v2, add the missing required
test case for all new patches. v3 Fixes both the test case
On 6/22/20 7:47 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 06:55:01PM -0400, Nicholas Krause via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 6/22/20 5:51 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/22/20 4:01 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
From: Nicholas Krause
This fixs the PR95672 by adding the missing
On 6/22/20 5:51 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/22/20 4:01 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
From: Nicholas Krause
This fixs the PR95672 by adding the missing TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION case in
cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic in order to avoid ICES on diagnosing
incomplete template pack expansion cases. In
From: Nicholas Krause
This fixs the PR95672 by adding the missing TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION case in
cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic in order to avoid ICES on diagnosing
incomplete template pack expansion cases. In v2, add the missing required
test case for all new patches. v3 Fixes both the test case
From: Nicholas Krause
This fixs the PR95672 by adding the missing TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION case in
cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic in order to avoid ICES on diagnosing
incomplete template pack expansion cases. In v2, add the missing required
test case for all new patches. v3 Fixes both the test case
From: Nicholas Krause
This fixs the PR95672 by adding the missing TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION case in
cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic in order to avoid ICES on diagnosing
incomplete template pack expansion cases. In v2, add the missing required
test case for all new patches. v3 Fixes both the test case
This fixs the PR95672 by adding the missing TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION case in
cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic in order to avoid ICES on diagnosing
incomplete template pack expansion cases.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause
Changelog:
*cp/type2ck.c: Add missing case TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION for diagnosticing
On 6/18/20 2:32 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
From: Nicholas Krause
Changelog:gcc/
*var-tracking.c(variable_tracking_main): Update
numbers for both number of basic blocks per
function and number of edges per function to
basic blocks to more sane numbers, in
From: Nicholas Krause
Changelog:gcc/
*var-tracking.c(variable_tracking_main): Update
numbers for both number of basic blocks per
function and number of edges per function to
basic blocks to more sane numbers, in order to
avoid extra edge cases.
Signed
On 6/12/20 11:49 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Martin Liška writes:
On 6/12/20 3:22 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Martin Liška writes:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c
index 636ad59c001..eac372e6abc 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-pa
On 5/18/20 6:51 PM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 5/18/20 12:02 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Martin Sebor writes:
On 5/16/20 4:43 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Sorry for the empty subject line earlier...
Jason Merrill writes:
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:47 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 3/30/20 12:18 AM, luoxhu via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 2020/3/28 00:04, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 09:34:00AM +0800, luoxhu wrote:
On 2020/3/27 07:59, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:15:22PM -0500, luo...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
frame_pointer_n
On 1/20/20 6:51 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 12:23:02AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 05:10:55PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:52:55PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
PR target/93073
* config/rs6000/rs6
On 11/23/19 6:09 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 06:01:28PM -0500, Nicholas Krause wrote:
Please just CC to this conversation as I keep getting removed.
Everyone who was on Cc: for this thread still is. This is how email
works. If you want to see everything on the
On 11/23/19 5:34 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 05:55:13PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Richard Sandiford writes:
(It's 23:35 local time, so it's still just about stage 1. :-))
Or actually, just under 1 day after end of stage 1. Oops.
Could have sworn stage
On 11/17/19 6:35 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
(It's 23:35 local time, so it's still just about stage 1. :-))
While working on SVE, I've noticed several cases in which we fail
to combine instructions because the combined form would need to be
placed earlier in the instruction stream than the l
On 9/21/19 2:18 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 03:29:27PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
I suppose we also need to decide what form we want to use for the
equivalent of gcc.gnu.org/rN. I figure it needs to be some prefix
followed by a "commit-ish" (hash, tag, etc.). P
, 88395 on
the gcc bugzilla. OK for merge?
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause
---
gcc/cp/constraint.cc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
index 9884eb0db50..a78d0a9a49b 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
, 88395 on
the gcc bugzilla.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause
---
gcc/cp/constraint.cc | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
index 9884eb0db50..cb06d0ec6e2 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
header
files being included.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause
---
gcc/gimplify.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/gimplify.c b/gcc/gimplify.c
index 6ac1b718ebd..e51c9b7d493 100644
--- a/gcc/gimplify.c
+++ b/gcc/gimplify.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ along with GCC
in the
future.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause
---
gcc/cp/constraint.cc | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
index 9884eb0db50..cb06d0ec6e2 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
@@ -1882,13
This fixes bug id,88395 by checking if the second tree reqs
is correctly not a null pointer before calling the function,
tsubst_requirement_body. Otherwise we will get a nullptr
if compiling with -fconcepts for concepts enabled.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause
---
gcc/cp/constraint.cc | 2 ++
1
Not sure if this is a correct fix to this bug found here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89796 but
comments are welcome. If a backtrace is required please
let me know.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause
---
gcc/cp/constraint.cc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion
This fixes the bug id, 71176 to use the proper known
code print formatter type, %lu for size_t rather than
%d which is considered best pratice for print statements.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause
---
fixincludes/fixincl.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a
This fixes the bug id, 71176 to use the proper known
code print formatter type, %lu for size_t rather than
%d which is considered best pratice for print statements.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause
---
fixincludes/fixincl.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a
This fixes the bug id, 71176 to use the proper known
code print formatter type, %lu for size_t rather than
%d which is considered best pratice for print statements.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause
---
fixincludes/fixincl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a
This adds the remainging noexcept causes required for this cause
to meet the spec as dicussed last year and documented here:
http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2899.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause
---
libstdc++-v3/include/std/tuple | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff
: Nicholas Krause
---
libitm/method-serial.cc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libitm/method-serial.cc b/libitm/method-serial.cc
index e4804946a34..ab23d0b5660 100644
--- a/libitm/method-serial.cc
+++ b/libitm/method-serial.cc
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ GTM::gtm_thread
any new regressions. Ok for trunk?
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause
---
gcc/calls.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/calls.c b/gcc/calls.c
index 72cf9e016c8..38b4dc7617b 100644
--- a/gcc/calls.c
+++ b/gcc/calls.c
@@ -1515,7 +1515,7
32 matches
Mail list logo
