On 6/22/20 10:01 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 09:42:51PM -0400, Nicholas Krause via Gcc-patches wrote:
From: Nicholas Krause <xerofo...@gmail.com>
This fixs the PR95672 by adding the missing TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION case in
cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic in order to avoid ICES on diagnosing
incomplete template pack expansion cases. In v2, add the missing required
test case for all new patches. v3 Fixes both the test case to compile in
C++11 mode and the message to print out only the type. v4 fixes the testcase
to only target C++11. v5 and v6 fix the test case properly.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* typeck2.c (cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic): Add missing
TYPE_EXPANSION_PACK
check for diagnosticing incomplete types in
cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic.
It's already been pointed out to you that it's "diagnosing".
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/template/PR95672.C: New test.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofo...@gmail.com>
---
gcc/cp/typeck2.c | 6 ++++++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/PR95672.C | 3 +++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/PR95672.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck2.c b/gcc/cp/typeck2.c
index 5fd3b82fa89..28b32fe0b5a 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/typeck2.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/typeck2.c
@@ -552,6 +552,12 @@ cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic (location_t loc, const_tree
value,
TYPE_NAME (type));
break;
+ case TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION:
+ emit_diagnostic (diag_kind, loc, 0,
Bad indenting.
Sorry seems Jason didn't catch that.
+ "invalid use of pack expansion %qT",
+ type);
+ break;
+
case TYPENAME_TYPE:
case DECLTYPE_TYPE:
emit_diagnostic (diag_kind, loc, 0,
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/PR95672.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/PR95672.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..fcc3da0a132
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/PR95672.C
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+// PR c++/96572
+// { dg-do compile}
+// { dg-options "-std=c++11" }
+struct g_class : decltype (auto) ... { }; // { dg-error "invalid use of pack
expansion" }
No, this is completely broken. It passes only because the patch file is
malformed and the last line will be lost when applying the patch, so the
test is an empty file.
Marek
Yes but now that I look at it seems the issue is that the error message
was changed. My concern is that the test will have to be updated
from the current every time the message changes like the current:
error: expected primary-expression before ‘auto’
1 | struct g_class : decltype (auto) ... { };
Is this something I should care about as seems emit_diagnostic and
friends sometimes do this.
Thanks,
Nick
--
Fundamentally an organism has conscious mental states if and only if
there is something that it is like to be that organism--something it is
like for the organism. - Thomas Nagel
