Just side remarks, the 0 init in the patch is fine.
On 27.02.23 03:53, Jerry D via Gcc-patches wrote:
regarding PACK: since this is a bogus warning as the compiler does
not realize that dim >= 1, wouldn't a
gcc_assert (dim >= 1);
Note: gcc_assert only exists in the compiler itself; in libgfo
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 5:38 PM Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Ok to commit?
>
> I suggest that when committed I'll also set the bugzilla
> entry in SUSPENDED mode, as opposed to RESOLVED. I mean,
> the issue isn't really solved; that'd be a patch improving
> pointer tracking acros
Hi Jerry,
I should have clarified in my posts that the warnings are on the use of
sstride[0], mstride[0] or both.
In a sense it is a
regression. It showed up when builds started to use -Wmaybe-unitialized.
I think this is OK for trunk now, and backport for up to whenever
-Wmaybe-uninitial
Replying to my own questions.
This use case is not valid from a Standard point of view. So not a bug
and no need to deal with that before next stage 1.
The question left is either we want to support it ?
François
On 23/02/23 22:14, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Based on my work on PR 96088 for
Hi there,
Just FYI that there is no obvious errors of this patch by running the GCC
bootstrap making.
Pan
From: Li, Pan2
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2023 3:21 PM
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.cheng ; richard.sandiford
Cc: incarnation.p.lee ; gcc-patches
; Kito.cheng ; rguenther
; jeffreyala
From: Junxian Zhu
Add buildtime option to decide whether will compiler build with `-mmsa` option
default.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config.gcc: add -with-{no-}msa build option.
* config/mips/mips.h: Likewise.
* doc/install.texi: Likewise.
Signed-off-by: Junxian Zhu
---
gcc/con
On 2/26/23 12:59 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Hi Jerry,
regarding PACK: since this is a bogus warning as the compiler does
not realize that dim >= 1, wouldn't a
gcc_assert (dim >= 1);
in the right place achieve the same effect, since the first argument
must be an array?
(It's different for SPREAD
Pushed to r13-6353.
在 2023/2/23 下午5:29, Lulu Cheng 写道:
The PCH mechanism first tries to map the .gch file to the virtual memory
space pointed to by TRY_EMPTY_VM_SPACE during the compilation process.
The original value of TRY_EMPTY_VM_SPACE macro is 0x80,
but like la464 only has 40 bits
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 9:27 AM Takayuki 'January June' Suwa
wrote:
> This patch introduces the use of CLAMPS instruction when the instruction
> is configured.
Testing.
> (Totally off-topic, but do you know anything about the SALT/SALTU
> instructions?
> I see them in the "Core Architecture Ins
Hi Jerry,
regarding PACK: since this is a bogus warning as the compiler does
not realize that dim >= 1, wouldn't a
gcc_assert (dim >= 1);
in the right place achieve the same effect, since the first argument
must be an array?
(It's different for SPREAD, though, where SOURCE may be scalar).
Che
The attached patch is minor and self explanatory. I assume this should
wait for gfortran 14 since no regression involved. Please advise otherwise.
Regression tested on x86-64.
OK for trunk when the time is right?
Regards,
Jerry
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date: Sat Feb 25 20:30:35 2023 -0800
Hello,
Ping https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606450.html
Thanks,
Lorenzo Salvadore
> From f8e2c2ee89a7d8741bb65163d1f1c20edcd546ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Lorenzo Salvadore develo...@lorenzosalvadore.it
>
> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 11:27:38 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH
This patch introduces the use of CLAMPS instruction when the instruction
is configured.
/* example */
int test(int a) {
if (a < -512)
return -512;
if (a > 511)
return 511;
return a;
}
;; prereq: TARGET_CLAMPS
test:
clamps a2, a2, 9
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'cpplib' has been submitted
by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/cpplib/sv.po
(This file, 'cpplib-13.1-b202302
cpplib-13.1-b20230212.sv.po.gz
Description: Binary data
The Translation Project robot, in the
name of your translation coordinator.
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Schwinge writes:
> Hi Arsen!
>
> Thanks for caring about the documentation infrastructure!
>
> On 2023-02-23T11:27:09+0100, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>> The commit "docs: Reorder @opindex to be before corresponding options"
>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermai
To assist Jakub's request for progress on this, I've re-tested this patch
(which
still applies cleanly) on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, again without any
regressions.
This is a middle-end piece of my preferred solution to PR106594, which is a
P1 regression affecting aarch64.
This patch teaches simplify-
17 matches
Mail list logo