Replying to my own questions.
This use case is not valid from a Standard point of view. So not a bug
and no need to deal with that before next stage 1.
The question left is either we want to support it ?
François
On 23/02/23 22:14, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Based on my work on PR 96088 for std::map I imagine this use case of
inserting a range of keys into an associative container. It behaves as
operator[] by inserting a default value for each key.
I wonder if the Standard says that it should work. Or maybe we want to
support it ?
I haven't checked if it used to work before we introduced the
_ConvertToValueType type. I have no old enough gcc to do so.
It is not supported by std::map neither, even without
_ConvertToValueType so I guess it was not working for
std::unordered_map prior to it.
If it can be considered as a bug I'll create a PR.
François
