On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 09:52:52AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> And two further ones now, bootstrapped/regtested on powerpc64{,le}-linux
> and committed.
4 further ones, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.
Jakub
2019-02-14 Jakub Jelinek
Backported from main
On February 14, 2019 12:10:54 AM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>Hi!
>
>The ubsan pass makes early uninit warning harder (and often doesn't
>warn),
>because e.g. for enum/bool loads we add instrumentation and the reads
>from
>the fields isn't easily visible to the uninit pass, we have
> _7 = &a
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 05:24:24PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:56:45PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > > Let's first define what MODE_XI means in standard_sse_constant_opcode
> > > as well as in all these mov patterns for with and without AVX512VL.
> > > Without
> > >
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 12:15:53AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 03:08:01PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > How does this test verify that both -fno-builtin-* options are in effect?
> > > That is, how does it fail if you remove either or both of those options?
> > >
> >
> > Wit
Nikhil Benesch noticed that changes in the GCC backend were making the
use of defer functions that call recover less efficient. A defer
thunk is a generated function that looks like this (this is the entire
function body):
if !runtime.setdeferretaddr(&L) {
deferredFunction()
}
L:
On 2/13/19 2:38 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
The attached patch moves the check for labeled DO statements to
the place where a label is referenced instead of where a label
was defined, which lead to false positives.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
OK for trunk?
Thanks Harald,
All OK with test
> 2019-02-13 Ian Lance Taylor
>
> * optc-save-gen.awk: Set var_opt_hash for initial optimizations
> and set current index for other optimizations.
>
> 2019-02-13 Ian Lance Taylor
>
> * gcc.dg/func-attr-1.c: New test.
I went ahead and committed this patch.
Ian
Szabolcs pointed out that my SIMD ABI patches that implement the
aarch64_vector_pcs attribute do not generate a warning or error
when being mixed with functions that do not have the attribute because
the 'affects_type_identity' field was false in the attribute table.
This patch fixes that. I thou
The attached patch adds the __builtin_is_constant_evaluated newly
introduced in GCC 9 to the Other Builtins section in the manual.
I followed the example of __builtin_setjmp and __builtin_longjmp
by encouraging the use of std::is_constant_evaluated over making
use of the built-in directly.
There
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 03:08:01PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > How does this test verify that both -fno-builtin-* options are in effect?
> > That is, how does it fail if you remove either or both of those options?
> >
>
> Without -fno-builtin-free -fno-builtin-malloc
As you haven't discovered any u
Hi!
The ubsan pass makes early uninit warning harder (and often doesn't warn),
because e.g. for enum/bool loads we add instrumentation and the reads from
the fields isn't easily visible to the uninit pass, we have
_7 = &a.a;
_8 = MEM[(_Bool *)_7];
instead etc. As the early uninit warning pass
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:54 PM Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> > Like this?
>
> This patch is missing any updates to options.texi to discuss the
> interation of Negative and RejectNegative with Joined.
I will add something.
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/p
I've tracked pr/88308 down to move_insn_for_shrink_wrap(). This function moves
an insn
from one BB to another by copying it and deleting the old one. Unfortunately
this does
the LABEL_NUSES count on labels referenced because deleting the old instruction
decrements
the count and nothing in this f
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:51 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 9:21 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:07 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:55 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Allow MMX intrinsic emulation with SSE/SSE2/SSSE3. Don't
Hi!
As the following testcases shows, cxx_eval_store_expression mishandles the
case when constexpr evaluation of the rhs (init) modifies part of the ctor
that the store stores into.
Except for unions (see below) I believe it is fine the way the outer refs
are handled, because we advance into anoth
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Like this?
This patch is missing any updates to options.texi to discuss the
interation of Negative and RejectNegative with Joined.
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69471-1.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69471-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 9:21 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:07 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:55 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > Allow MMX intrinsic emulation with SSE/SSE2/SSSE3. Don't enable MMX ISA
> > > by default with TARGET_MMX_WITH_SSE.
> > >
> >
Sorry, forgot to attach the patch to the revised testcase f2018_obs.f90.
Here it is.
Regards,
Harald
Adjusted ChangeLog:
2019-02-13 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/88248
* gfortran.dg/pr88248.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/f2018_obs.f90: Updated test.
On 02/13/19 23:38, Haral
The attached patch moves the check for labeled DO statements to
the place where a label is referenced instead of where a label
was defined, which lead to false positives.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Harald
2019-02-13 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/88248
Clang defines the __cpp_impl_destroying_delete macro unconditionally, so
that the feature is supported whenever the library type is defined. This
is incompatible with the current definition in libstdc++ because we use
constexpr and inline variables, which will give an error for older -std
modes.
Hello!
Attached patch fixes operand predicates of several vec_set patterns
and uses correct constraints and attributes for various alternatives.
2019-02-13 Uroš Bizjak
* config/i386/sse.md (vec_set_0): Use
nonimmediate_operand as operand 2 predicate.
(vec_set_0): Ditto.
(vec_s
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 09:28, wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:35:03AM +, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> > > Is this necessary? I'd prefer to not set this field if it can be
> > > avoided. The same goes for the others, I intend to remove them at
> > > soonest convenience once the problematic pa
The attached patch adds documentation for the __has_attribute (and
__has_cpp_attribute) and __has_include operators added in r215752.
I was a little unsure where to add this, whether the preprocessor
manual or the GCC manual, or both. It seems that it belongs in
the preprocessor manual but since
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 12:02 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 08:43:45AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > It seems right in the march= case to handle that combination as
> > > -march=foobar - but it's less clear if that must always be the case for
> > > Joined options with neg
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:03 PM Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:59:05AM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:44:42AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 2/13/19 12:13 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > Here we ICE because we're in a template and the construct
Ping^2
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 4:09 PM Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> Ping
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:06 AM Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> > Here we warn because i::dispatch has internal linkage (because l
> > does) and is never instantiated (because the vtable is never emitted).
> > The regression hap
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:59:05AM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:44:42AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 2/13/19 12:13 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > Here we ICE because we're in a template and the constructor contains an
> > > OVERLOAD, so calling check_narrowing -> m
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:07 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:55 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > Allow MMX intrinsic emulation with SSE/SSE2/SSSE3. Don't enable MMX ISA
> > by default with TARGET_MMX_WITH_SSE.
> >
> > For pr82483-1.c and pr82483-2.c, "-mssse3 -mno-mmx" compiles in
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 13:24, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
> Solaris ld only gained support for section bracketing in Solaris 11.4.
> Fortunately, in gdc it is only used for the minfo section, so it's easy
> to provide a workaround by adding two additional startup files
> drt{begin,end}.o which define __s
On 2/12/19 4:43 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Martin,
The attached patch removes the assumption introduced earlier today
in my fix for bug 87996 that the valid_constant_size_p argument is
a constant expression. I couldn't come up with a C/C++ test case
where this isn't true but apparently it can h
On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 20:08 +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 14:37, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:22:14AM +, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> > > On 13/02/2019 09:09, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > > To make it work together with doing llvm_binutils only once,
>
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 14:37, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:22:14AM +, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> > On 13/02/2019 09:09, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > To make it work together with doing llvm_binutils only once, the global
> > > now
> > > has multiple values
> > > 0 - disallow
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:29 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On 2/12/19, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> >> This way, it is clear that we enable alternative 0 only for native
> >> mmx. It looks to me that we need to add similar treatment to a couple
> >> of other patterns in sse.md, where we allow "y" constraint,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:51:07AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> To get Richard's emin/emax patch into the tree so adequate
> testing can be done prior to the 9.1 release, I'll suggest
> that we XFAIL norm2_3.f90 while we work out the details for
> norm2.
>
> Yesteraday, I looked at Jakub's patch, a
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 07:30:53PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 07:17:53PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux (together with
> > > Richard's patch), ok for trunk?
> >
> > A couple of points:
> >
> > with this patch, we
On 2/13/19 12:36 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Feb 8, 2019, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/8/19 4:07 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Feb 7, 2019, Jason Merrill wrote:
In protected_accessible_p and shared_member_p, if we're left with a
USING_DECL after strip_using_decl, we can't give a meaningfu
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 07:17:53PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux (together with
> > Richard's patch), ok for trunk?
>
> A couple of points:
>
> with this patch, we will have an algorithm that will evaluate NORM2
> in a different way than bef
Hi Jakub,
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux (together with
Richard's patch), ok for trunk?
A couple of points:
with this patch, we will have an algorithm that will evaluate NORM2
in a different way than before, possibly leading to regressions
in some cases where we previou
Hi Gerald and Martin,
On Mon, Jan 28 2019, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2019, Martin Jambor wrote:
>>> What is a "wrong absolute value function"? That might be good to
>>> show by means of an example? (Also in invoke.texi, which I checked
>>> before writing this.)
>> I'm
On Feb 8, 2019, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 2/8/19 4:07 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Feb 7, 2019, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>
>>> In protected_accessible_p and shared_member_p, if we're left with a
>>> USING_DECL after strip_using_decl, we can't give a meaningful answer,
>>> and should probably
On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 16:54 +, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > +/* Table of machine attributes. */
> > +static const struct attribute_spec aarch64_attribute_table[] =
> > +{
> > + /* { name, min_len, max_len, decl_req, type_req, fn_type_req,
> > + affects_type_identity, handler, exclude } */
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:44:42AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 2/13/19 12:13 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > Here we ICE because we're in a template and the constructor contains an
> > OVERLOAD, so calling check_narrowing -> maybe_constant_value crashes.
> >
> > check_narrowing deliberately call
On 08/11/2018 17:52, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> This is a resubmission of patch 1 to support the Aarch64 SIMD ABI [1] in
> GCC, it does not have any functional changes from the last submit.
>
> The significant difference between the standard ARM ABI and the SIMD ABI
> is that in the normal ABI a callee
On 2019-02-13 5:54 a.m., Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
PING.
Since Jeff is away can another maintainer have a look at this please?
I see the following patch
diff --git a/gcc/lra-constraints.c b/gcc/lra-constraints.c
index
c061093ed699620afe2dfda60d58066d6967523a..736b084acc552b75ff4d369b658
On 2/13/19 12:13 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
Here we ICE because we're in a template and the constructor contains an
OVERLOAD, so calling check_narrowing -> maybe_constant_value crashes.
check_narrowing deliberately calls maybe_constant_value and not
fold_non_dependent_expr so as to avoid instantia
Hi Tamar,
On 2/13/19 4:31 PM, Tamar Christina wrote:
The 02/13/2019 10:57, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Tamar
On 2/13/19 10:33 AM, Tamar Christina wrote:
Hi All,
The iterators ANY64 and ANY128 are used in various general split
patterns and
are supposed to contain any 64 bit and 128 bit modes res
Tested x86_64-linux, checking in as obvious.
2019-02-13 Marek Polacek
PR c++/77304
* g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class13.C: New test.
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class13.C
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class13.C
new file mode 100644
index 000..14c601ba
The 02/13/2019 10:57, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi Tamar
>
> On 2/13/19 10:33 AM, Tamar Christina wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > The iterators ANY64 and ANY128 are used in various general split
> > patterns and
> > are supposed to contain any 64 bit and 128 bit modes respectively.
> >
> > For some reas
Ping:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg00363.html
On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 21:23 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> PR c++/88680 reports excess warnings from -Wtype-limits after the C++
> FE's use of location wrappers was extended in r267272 for cases such
> as:
>
> const unsigned n = 8;
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 8:08 PM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2017, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> > So I guess we need some alternate PerFunction option flag that makes
> > it per-function, but not part of the ICF hash?
>
> Like this...
>
> If we include them in the ICF hash, they may cause c
> On February 13, 2019 7:20:37 AM GMT+01:00, "Martin Liška"
> wrote:
> >As seen in the PR, bump would be needed due to r268698.
> >
> >Ready for GCC-8 branch?
>
> OK. It's unfortunate we need to break streaming though.
Yep, it was me breaking it for fix of PR88561 which is correctness
issue. I
On 2/13/19 9:36 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
Ping
yes, sorry didn't realize you were waiting on me.
On Fri, 2019-02-08 at 12:03 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
Ping
On Fri, 2019-01-25 at 15:02 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2019-01-25 at 08:59 -0800, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 1/25/19 8:48 AM
Ping
On Fri, 2019-02-08 at 12:03 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> Ping
>
> On Fri, 2019-01-25 at 15:02 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-01-25 at 08:59 -0800, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > > On 1/25/19 8:48 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > > PR c++/89036 reports an ICE due to this assertion fai
This backports the fix to the GCC 8 branch where we have a different
way of determining availability.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2019-02-13 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2019-01-08 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimi
Hi.
I'm sending patch where I document changes I made during GCC 9
development. I would appreciate both language and factical comments
about the patch.
Martin
---
htdocs/gcc-9/changes.html | 65 ---
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --gi
On February 13, 2019 6:53:17 AM GMT+01:00, "Martin Liška"
wrote:
>Hi.
>
>As Honza noticed, there's still some leftover from MPX removal.
>May I remove another bunch of fields now, or should I wait
>for next stage1?
You can do it now.
Richard.
>Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and surv
Hi Wilco,
On 2/13/19 12:42 PM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
ping
From: Wilco Dijkstra
Sent: 04 February 2019 14:59
To: GCC Patches
Cc: nd; Kyrylo Tkachov
Subject: [PATCH][ARM] Fix Thumb-1 ldm (PR89190)
This patch fixes an ICE in the Thumb-1 LDM peepholer. Thumb-1 LDMs
always update the base regist
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:22:14AM +, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> On 13/02/2019 09:09, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > To make it work together with doing llvm_binutils only once, the global now
> > has multiple values
> > 0 - disallow blank lines
> > 1 - allow them for a single test only, reset after test
Hi!
The following testcase is miscompiled on x86_64-linux (-m32 and -m64) at
-O1, as a pointer has two vars in points-to set, the first one is escaped
heap var and the second one is escaped non-heap var, and in the end the last
var that sets vars_contains_escaped won and overwrote
vars_contains_es
ping
From: Wilco Dijkstra
Sent: 04 February 2019 14:59
To: GCC Patches
Cc: nd; Kyrylo Tkachov
Subject: [PATCH][ARM] Fix Thumb-1 ldm (PR89190)
This patch fixes an ICE in the Thumb-1 LDM peepholer. Thumb-1 LDMs
always update the base register except if the base is loaded.
The current impleme
On 2/12/19 10:22 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
PING^1.
On 2/4/19 1:46 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 2/4/19 10:56 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hi.
Starting from r266926 'switch (e->value.op.op)' is reached when
one using -fdec. That's wrong as -fdec causes to create a e->value.function.
I hope the proper fi
Hi Ramana,
>> ARMv5te bootstrap OK, regression tests pass. OK for commit?
>
> Interesting bug. armv5te-linux bootstrap ? Can you share your --target
> and --with-arch flags ?
--target/host/build=arm-linux-gnueabi --with-arch=armv5te --with-mode=arm
>> + if (GET_CODE (base) == SYMBOL_REF)
>
> I
Tamar Christina writes:
> Hi Richard,
>
> The 02/11/2019 18:22, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> pollute the target-independent namespace). Then we can use something like:
>>
>> expand_operand ops[3];
>> create_output_operand (&ops[0], dest, mode);
>> create_input_operand (&ops[1], pred, GET_MO
May I please ping this so that we can reach mainline soon?
Thanks,
Martin
On 2/5/19 1:48 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 2/5/19 2:31 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> My main comment here is that if you go with the approach of a single
>> header shared by multilibs, you should also update the driver code
Hi Tamar
On 2/13/19 10:33 AM, Tamar Christina wrote:
Hi All,
The iterators ANY64 and ANY128 are used in various general split
patterns and
are supposed to contain any 64 bit and 128 bit modes respectively.
For some reason these patterns had HI but not HF. This adds HF so
that general
64 an
PING.
Since Jeff is away can another maintainer have a look at this please?
Cheers,
Andre
On 01/02/2019 14:31, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
On 11/01/2019 22:54, Jeff Law wrote:
On 1/8/19 8:21 AM, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
On 07/01/2019 22:50, Jeff Law wrote:
On 1/7/19 7:42 AM, Andre Vi
Hi All,
The iterators ANY64 and ANY128 are used in various general split patterns and
are supposed to contain any 64 bit and 128 bit modes respectively.
For some reason these patterns had HI but not HF. This adds HF so that general
64 and 128 bit splits are generated for these modes as well. Th
Hi Richard,
The 02/11/2019 18:22, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> pollute the target-independent namespace). Then we can use something like:
>
> expand_operand ops[3];
> create_output_operand (&ops[0], dest, mode);
> create_input_operand (&ops[1], pred, GET_MODE (pred));
> create_input_opera
On 13/02/2019 09:09, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
To make it work together with doing llvm_binutils only once, the global now
has multiple values
0 - disallow blank lines
1 - allow them for a single test only, reset after testing it in gcc-dg-prune
2 - allow it for all tests (llvm_binutils)
FWIW, this
On February 13, 2019 7:20:37 AM GMT+01:00, "Martin Liška"
wrote:
>As seen in the PR, bump would be needed due to r268698.
>
>Ready for GCC-8 branch?
OK. It's unfortunate we need to break streaming though.
Richard.
>Thanks,
>Martin
>
>gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>2019-02-13 Martin Liska
>
> PR
> The code will do:
> size = convert_to_mode (cmp_mode, size, 1);
> i.e. convert size from whatever mode it had before to cmp_mode and the
> test is whether it can do so without changing the behavior. If size is
> non-constant, then that can be obviously (without using range info etc.)
>
> On 11 Feb 2019, at 22:32, Ramana Radhakrishnan
> wrote:
> Can Olivier or someone who cares about vxworks also give this a quick
> sanity run for the alternate code path once we resolve some of the
> review questions here ? Don't we also need to worry about
> -mslow-flash-data where we get r
Hi!
The following patch fixes various testsuite issues related to
allow_blank_lines.
One issue is that even when llvm_binutils effective target is now cached so
it is checked just once (per runtest invocation), if the first test invoked
emits some diagnostics, that diagnostics in the log file app
> Eric, could you have another look if I'm missing something?
Note that this OPTION_DEFAULT_SPECS code is duplicated in linux64.h.
There is this comment:
In the SPARC_BI_ARCH compiler we cannot pass %{!mcpu=*:-mcpu=%(VALUE)}
here, otherwise say -mcpu=v7 would be passed even when -m64.
C
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 12:01 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> The following patch fixes ICE, when we try to split a double-word TLS load
> or store. The problem is that x86_64_immediate_operand disallows CONST_INT
> offsets with -mcmodel=large. I guess it is intentional for SYMBOL_REFs,
> LA
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:44 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:24 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >
> > On 2/12/19, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:44 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 8:35 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Feb 12, 201
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 08:43:45AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > It seems right in the march= case to handle that combination as
> > -march=foobar - but it's less clear if that must always be the case for
> > Joined options with negative versions (at least, the semantics would need
> > definin
77 matches
Mail list logo
