On 11/22/2017 04:50 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/16/2017 02:29 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Ping.
I've fixed the outstanding false positive exposed by the Linux
kernel. The kernel builds with four instances of the warning,
all of them valid (perfect overlap in memcpy).
I also built Glibc. It shows o
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 10:01:22AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Actually, thinking about it some more, maybe it would be more efficient
> to gather this information during construction of the SWITCH_STMT in some
> new flag on the tree, so cxx_block_may_fallthru would just:
Here it is implemented,
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Marc Glisse wrote:
new version, regtested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu. The front-end
parts are up for review.
2017-10-28 Marc Glisse
gcc/c/
* c-fold.c (c_fully_fold_internal): Handle POINTER_DIFF_EXPR.
* c-typeck.c (pointer_diff): Use POINTER_DIFF_E
On 2017.11.14 at 13:32 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > The hash_map interface is a lot more convenient than that of
> > hash_table for cases where it makes sense, but there hasn't been a way
> > to get the ggc_cache_remove behavior with a h
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 09:39:54AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Okay, thanks! Is this better than bailing out though, do you have
> > an example?
>
> I don't, but I haven't bootstrapped/regtested with a patch to gather
> statistics on whether it would ever be successful (how? Should I note in
Just having pointed someone to our bug reporting instructions, I had
a look myself and noticed that they are a little unwieldy . This is
a first step of shortening the text a little.
Help and contributions very welcome!
Gerald
Index: index.html
==
Installed as obvious.
Andreas.
* g++.dg/abi/structret1.C (FrameworkObject::action): Return a
value.
Index: g++.dg/abi/structret1.C
===
--- g++.dg/abi/structret1.C (revision 255148)
+++ g++.dg/abi/structret1.C
I've had this in a local tree since February; better to flush local
changes.
This just adjust a comment to match the code wrt. ordering of steps.
Applied, and I updated the instance on gcc.gnu.org as well.
Gerald
Index: bin/preprocess
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 11:21:49AM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
> this is the (hopefully) final implementation of the support for the unrolling
> pragma in the Fortran front-end. However the documentation is still missing
> because I don't really know where and under which form to put it.
>
>
(Just a minor update to the last patch to use is_function_v instead
of is_function::value)
Implement std::to_address for C++2a
2017-11-25 Glen Joseph Fernandes
* include/bits/ptr_traits.h (to_address): Implement to_address.
* testsuite/20_util/to_address/1.cc: New tests.
Test
Hi,
this is the (hopefully) final implementation of the support for the unrolling
pragma in the Fortran front-end. However the documentation is still missing
because I don't really know where and under which form to put it.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, OK for the mainline?
2017-11-25 Bernha
Hi,
this is the (hopefully) final implementation of the support for the unrolling
pragma in the C and C++ front-ends. It contains a couple of fixes for the C++
front-ends to make it correctly handle unroll and ivdep for the same loop.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, OK for the mainline?
2017-11
Hello,
the way full masks are generated currently in avx2intrin.h is
questionable: opaque for the inline functions, weird/wrong for the macros.
It is possible we may want to add code so the constant mask with all ones
may be generated with vxorpd+vcmpeqpd instead of loading it from memory,
b
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:59:53PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> The testcase below has a useless break; that causes a bogus -Wreturn-type
> warning. The C++ FE already has code to avoid adding a BREAK_STMT
> after a return or similar sequence that is known not to return.
> The following patch ext
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> Hi Yuri,
>
> Sorry I missed this. Please cc: me to prevent that from happening.
Segher,
Sorry, somehow I missed your reply!
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:42:00AM +0100, Yury Gribov wrote:
>> This patch fixes issues reported in
>> http
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 07:19:29PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:38:13PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > The following testcase ICEs in wide-int*, but the reason is a mode mismatch
> > (we build a SImode MULT with one QImode argument and one VOIDmode argumen
16 matches
Mail list logo