On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:37:28PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> Jason said (for the C++ part of the patch):
> > About passing parser in or not, I'm happy with the current approach;
> > adding things to the stack isn't free in a highly recursive program
> > like GCC.
> (in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/
On August 9, 2017 12:18:41 AM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu" wrote:
>This patch adds -static-pie to GCC driver to create static PIE. A
>static
>position independent executable (PIE) is similar to static executable,
>but can be loaded at any address without a dynamic linker. All linker
>input files must be
Because the comment (for example) in g+=.dg/ext/packed8.C says
// NOTE: This test assumes packed structure layout differs from unpacked
// structure layout. This isn't true, e.g., with the default
// arm-none-elf options.
If we could just delete the -mstructure-size-boundary=8 optio
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:24:26PM -0500, Will Schmidt wrote:
> * fold-vec-pack-double.c: New.
> * fold-vec-pack-int.c: New.
> * fold-vec-pack-longlong.c: New.
> * fold-vec-pack-short.c: New.
Okay for trunk (with the changelog fixed). Thanks,
Segher
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:22:40PM -0500, Will Schmidt wrote:
> * fold-vec-msum-char.c: New.
> * fold-vec-msum-short.c: New.
Okay for trunk with the paths in the changelog fixed. Thanks!
Segher
Hi!
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:20:14PM -0500, Will Schmidt wrote:
> * fold-vec-madd-double.c: New.
> * fold-vec-madd-float.c: New.
> * fold-vec-madd-short.c: New.
Same as before, it needs the path in here (the path is relative to the
directory the changelog is in).
The actual t
Hi Will,
> * fold-vec-cntlz-int.c: New.
* gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-cntlz-int.c: New.
Okay for trunk with the changelog fixed like that. Thanks,
Segher
Hi!
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:14:56PM -0500, Will Schmidt wrote:
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.c: rs6000_option_override_internal() Add blurb
> to indicate when early gimple folding has been disabled.
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_option_override_internal): ...
> rs6000
This patch adds -static-pie to GCC driver to create static PIE. A static
position independent executable (PIE) is similar to static executable,
but can be loaded at any address without a dynamic linker. All linker
input files must be compiled with -fpie or -fPIE and linker must support
--no-dynam
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu,
> ok for trunk?
OK.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Hmm, how about this, then?
>
> "operand of ?: changes signedness from %qT to %qT due to unsignedness of
> other operand"
>
> I couldn't come up with anything more brief yet conveying all the information.
> I don't like adding "second"/"third"/... very
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> Can you take a look at this patch:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-08/msg00011.html
This patch is OK.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
Hi,
[PATCH, rs6000] testcase coverage for vec_pack builtin
Add some testcase coverage for the vec_pack built-in.
Tested across power platforms (p6 and newer).
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
-Will
[gcc/testsuite]
|---2017-08-08 Will Schmidt
* fold-vec-pack-doubl
Hi,
[PATCH, rs6000] Add testcase coverage for vec_msum built-in
Add testcase coverage for vec_msum built-in.
Tested across power platforms (p6 and newer).
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
-Will
[gcc/testsuite]
2017-08-08 Will Schmidt
* fold-vec-msum-char.c: New.
*
Hi,
[Patch, rs6000] testcase coverage for vec_madd built-in function
Add testcase coverage for vec_madd built-in function.
Tested across power platforms (p6 and newer).
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
-Will
[testsuite]
2017-08-08 Will Schmidt
* fold-vec-madd-double.c: Ne
Hi,
[PATCH, rs6000] testcase coverage for vec_cntlz
Add testcase coverage for vec_cntlz built-in functions.
Tested across power platforms (p6 and newer).
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
-Will
[gcc/testsuite]
2017-08-08 Will Schmidt
* fold-vec-cntlz-int.c: New.
* fold-
Hi,
[PATCH, rs6000] enable early debug and disable switch for gimple folding
Enable debug options related to gimple folding for the rs6000 target.
Adds some output to the existing -mdebug=builtin option
Add a -mgimple-folding=off option to disable the early rs6000 gimple folding.
OK for tru
For reference, here's the diff of the v3 C++ patch to the v2 patch,
in case it's useful:
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* parser.c (token_pair::require_open): Use tabs rather than spaces.
(token_pair::peek_open): Delete.
(token_pair::require_close): Use tabs rather than spaces.
On Fri, 2017-08-04 at 12:09 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/04/2017 08:32 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 11:34 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > On 08/01/2017 02:21 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > > Changed in v2:
> > > >
> > > > * Renamed template argument to traits_t; eliminated sub
Correct.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Kenner [mailto:ken...@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 1:20 PM
To: Michael Collison
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; pins...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [Aarch64] Optimize subtract in shift counts
> Correct. It is truncated
On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 14:25 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
Thanks for looking at this.
> On 08/01/2017 04:21 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > @@ -27632,6 +27769,9 @@ cp_parser_sizeof_operand (cp_parser*
> > parser, enum rid keyword)
> > {
> >tree type = NULL_TREE;
> >
> > + matching_pa
> Correct. It is truncated for integer shift, but not simd shift
> instructions. We generate a pattern in the split that only generates
> the integer shift instructions.
That's unfortunate, because it would be nice to do this in simplify_rtx,
since it's machine-independent, but that has to be cond
Correct. It is truncated for integer shift, but not simd shift instructions. We
generate a pattern in the split that only generates the integer shift
instructions.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Kenner [mailto:ken...@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 1:04 PM
To: Micha
> Because for integer shift instructions the shift count is
> truncated. We ensure that we only use integer shift instructions by
> emitting a shift with a mask. This only matches integer shift
> instructions in the md file.
That's why I asked about SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED. So it's truncated for
so
Because for integer shift instructions the shift count is truncated. We ensure
that we only use integer shift instructions by emitting a shift with a mask.
This only matches integer shift instructions in the md file.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Kenner [mailto:ken...@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.
> This case is covered by Wilco's previous reply:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-08/msg00575.html
Which I don't understand:
> No it's perfectly safe - it becomes an integer-only shift after the
> split since it keeps the masking as part of the pattern.
Let say we have your first ex
This case is covered by Wilco's previous reply:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-08/msg00575.html
-Original Message-
From: Richard Kenner [mailto:ken...@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 5:13 AM
To: Michael Collison
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; pins...@gmail
Original message: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg02005.html
Patches 2 and 3 have been committed and I have corrected the error in
patch 5. I configuring with --enable-checking=yes,rtl
--enable-languages=all and retested with
RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/\{,-m32\}" The updated
This update adds documentation for the new effective taregts in addition to a
few existing effective targets that were undocumented.
Changes to lib/target-supports.exp and documentation:
* Add effective-targets avx512f and avx512f_runtime (needed for new
tests).
* Corrects bug in check_avx2_hw_a
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On August 8, 2017 7:36:35 PM GMT+02:00, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>Richard Sandiford writes:
>>> Richard Biener writes:
On August 8, 2017 6:38:30 PM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu"
>> wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Richard Sandi
On 08/07/2017 10:59 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 08/02/2017 09:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 08/02/2017 01:04 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/28/2017 05:13 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
Following patch skips empty strings in 'target' attribute.
Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survive
On August 8, 2017 7:36:35 PM GMT+02:00, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>Richard Sandiford writes:
>> Richard Biener writes:
>>> On August 8, 2017 6:38:30 PM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu"
> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven writes:
>> On 8/7/20
David Malcolm writes:
> This patch kit clearly isn't ready yet as-is (see e.g. the
> "known unknowns" below), but I'm posting it now in the hope of
> getting early feedback.
Looks really useful. One thing I wasn't sure of from a quick scan was:
what would happen if the input had something like a
Richard Sandiford writes:
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On August 8, 2017 6:38:30 PM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu"
>> wrote:
>>>On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Richard Sandiford
>>> wrote:
Arjan van de Ven writes:
> On 8/7/2017 8:43 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 08:39:2
Richard Biener writes:
> On August 8, 2017 6:38:30 PM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu" wrote:
>>On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> Arjan van de Ven writes:
On 8/7/2017 8:43 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 08:39:24AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> When L
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 04:07:49PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On August 7, 2017 11:09:59 AM GMT+02:00, Marek Polacek
> wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 10:58:09AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 10:47:51AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >> > In my recent change I fail
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 6:38 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> When Linux/x86-64 kernel is compiled with -fno-omit-frame-pointer.
> this optimization removes more than 730
>
> pushq %rbp
> movq %rsp, %rbp
> popq %rbp
If you don't want the frame pointer, why are you compiling w
On August 8, 2017 6:38:30 PM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu" wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Arjan van de Ven writes:
>>> On 8/7/2017 8:43 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 08:39:24AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> When Linux/x86-64 kernel is compiled w
Jeff Law writes:
> On 08/05/2017 11:15 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 11:07:20AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> Segher Boessenkool writes:
This series creates pattern_cost and insn_cost functions that together
replace the existing insn_rtx_cost function.
>
Hello!
Attached patch introduces -mstack-protector-guard-reg= and
-mstack-protector-guard-offset= options to make stack canary location
customizable. These are the same options powerpc has.
2017-08-08 Uros Bizjak
PR target/81708
* config/i386/i386.opt (mstack-protector-guard-reg=): N
On 08/05/2017 11:15 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 11:07:20AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Segher Boessenkool writes:
>>> This series creates pattern_cost and insn_cost functions that together
>>> replace the existing insn_rtx_cost function.
>>>
>>> pattern_cost is l
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven writes:
>> On 8/7/2017 8:43 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 08:39:24AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
When Linux/x86-64 kernel is compiled with -fno-omit-frame-pointer.
this optimization removes more
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 08/02/2017 09:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> On 08/02/2017 01:04 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 07/28/2017 05:13 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
Following patch skips empty strings in 'target' attribute.
Patch can bootstrap on
On 08/07/2017 04:33 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 06:25:49AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 04:06:39PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
2017-07-24 Segher Boessenkool
gcc/testsuite/
PR rtl-optimization/81423
* gcc.c-tortu
This patch series improves the attribute checking infrastructure
to make it easy to express mutual exclusivity between attributes,
detect and drop conflicting attributes as they are being added
to declarations, and help find sources of conflicts when they
involve two distinct declarations of the s
Patch 3 in the series restores the diagnostics for conflicting
attribute aligned on the same function (this regressed in r192199
in GCC 4.9), and also makes use of the enhanced infrastructure to
enhance the detection of the same conflicts on distinct declarations
of the same function.
Rather than
Part 2 of the series contains the mechanical changes to all
the back ends and to front ends other than C and C++. There
are no functional changes here.
Martin
PR c/81544 - attribute noreturn and warn_unused_result on the same function accepted
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR c/81544
* config/alpha/alpha.
Part 1 of the patch series is the core of the enhancement without
the (trivial) changes to the back ends and front ends other than
C and C++.
Marek, I tried to follow what we discussed in IRC. Please let
me know if I missed something.
Joseph, I read your comments on Marek's patch for the same b
Hi,
When investigate issues, I ran into this obvious issue that the last candidate
is not related to compare type iv_use.
This patch fixes it. Will apply later.
Thanks,
bin
2017-08-08 Bin Cheng
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (relate_compare_use_with_all_cands): Handle
boundary case
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 11/09/2016 11:22 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2016 02:00 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> On 11/03/2016 01:12 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> + tree init = DECL_INITIAL (decl);
>>
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 6:04 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 06/07/2017 02:07 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 6:4
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:08 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 08/03/2017 02:45 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/01/2017 03:25 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Tue
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > The following improves niter analysis for range-based for loops
> > by handling ADDR_EXPR in expand_simple_operations.
> >
> > Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
> >
>
Fixed with r250952.
Bill
> On Aug 6, 2017, at 3:08 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
> FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-2.c (test for errors, line
> 18)
> FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-2.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-5.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> The following improves niter analysis for range-based for loops
> by handling ADDR_EXPR in expand_simple_operations.
>
> Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
>
> Richard.
>
> 2017-08-08 Richard Biener
>
>
The following improves niter analysis for range-based for loops
by handling ADDR_EXPR in expand_simple_operations.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
Richard.
2017-08-08 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/81719
* tree-ssa-loop-niter.c: Include tree-dfa.
I am testing the following patch to reduce SLP vectorization SLP build
time which can be exponential in some cases due to us now aggressively
allowing build-from-scalars as fallback. The patch fixes this by
avoiding repeated (failing and thus not accounted with max_tree_size)
SLP builds on the sa
> The pattern will only be matched if the value is positive. More
> specifically if the constant value is 32 (SImode) or 64 (DImode).
I don't mean the constant, but the value subtracted from it.
If that's negative, then we have a shift count larger than the
wordsize.
Hi.
As mentioned in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39851#c0 we need
to call targetm.target_option.override () in order to properly report which
ISA options are enabled for a -march/-mtune. Currently, opts.c uses just
#include "common/common-target.h" we are unable to call the functio
On 08/08/2017 01:17 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> As LABEL_DECL can point to another function (non-local goto), we must
>> properly
>> compare them.
>>
>> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
>
On 11/09/2016 11:22 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 11/03/2016 02:00 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On 11/03/2016 01:12 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> + tree init = DECL_INITIAL (decl);
> + if (init
> + && TREE_READONLY (decl)
>
The following patch is a partial reversal of r250815 (on the branch)
which restores behavior of always calling find_many_sub_basic_blocks
on prologue inserted code. Doing that probably masks an issue with
either scheduling or the way x86 sets up the PIC register.
The patch allows grub2 to succes
Ping.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 01:27:01PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Ping.
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 12:53:10PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:51:33AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > The changes to diagnostic-core.h and diagnostic.c are OK.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
Ping.
The make_location change should allow us to do really cool things, if we
pass c_exprs to build_binary_loc, btw. Like all the ranges for diagnostic
and similar.
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 02:43:39PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:48:01PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
>
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017, Tamar Christina wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> > switch (code)
> > {
> > case MULT_EXPR:
> > if (!convert_mult_to_widen (stmt, &gsi)
> > && !convert_expand_mult_copysign (stmt, &gsi)
> >
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As LABEL_DECL can point to another function (non-local goto), we must properly
> compare them.
>
> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
>
> Ready to be installed ?
Ok.
So with bb1 == bb2 == NUL
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> This is an obvious patch. It fixes ICE in PR81744 by deep copying expression
> of loop's number of iterations.
> Test result checked. Is it OK?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Thanks,
> bin
> 2017-08-07 Bin Cheng
>
> PR tree-optimiza
Hello.
As LABEL_DECL can point to another function (non-local goto), we must properly
compare them.
Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
Ready to be installed ?
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2017-08-08 Martin Liska
PR tree-opt/81696
* ipa-icf-g
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PR81354 describes an ICE in SLSR that occurs when a GIMPLE PHI statement
> changes
> address during the SLSR pass. SLSR contains a mapping table from GIMPLE
> statements
> to entries in the candidate table that relies on this address
Hi,
This is an obvious patch. It fixes ICE in PR81744 by deep copying expression
of loop's number of iterations.
Test result checked. Is it OK?
Thanks,
bin
2017-08-07 Bin Cheng
PR tree-optimization/81744
* tree-predcom.c (prepare_finalizers_chain): Deep copy expr of
l
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> If there are forced or non-local labels in OpenMP parallel/task/target
> regions (or OpenACC or Cilk+), then we often fail to link as the following
> testcases show - the labels aren't emitted anywhere, just references to
> them.
>
> While it is
Richard Kenner wrote:
>Michael Collison wrote:
> > On Aarc64 SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED is only true if SIMD code generation
> > is disabled. This is because the simd instructions can be used for
> > shifting but they do not truncate the shift count.
>
> In that case, the change isn't safe! Consider if
On 08/08/2017 06:36 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
I'm sending final version that I'm going to install. Compared to the previous
version I tested
all targets in contrib/config-list.mk.
I ran into a build breaker for an nvptx offloading compiler (where the
ACCEL_COMPILER-guarded code is enab
On 08/08/2017 10:45 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi Tom!
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:49:11 +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
this patch adds nvptx_override_options_after_change, containing a
workaround for PR81430.
--- a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c
+++ b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c
@@ -207,6 +207,17 @@ nvptx_o
Hi Tom!
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:49:11 +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> this patch adds nvptx_override_options_after_change, containing a
> workaround for PR81430.
> --- a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c
> @@ -207,6 +207,17 @@ nvptx_option_override (void)
> target_flags
75 matches
Mail list logo
