Hi, [Patch, rs6000] testcase coverage for vec_madd built-in function Add testcase coverage for vec_madd built-in function.
Tested across power platforms (p6 and newer). OK for trunk? Thanks, -Will [testsuite] 2017-08-08 Will Schmidt <will_schm...@vnet.ibm.com> * fold-vec-madd-double.c: New. * fold-vec-madd-float.c: New. * fold-vec-madd-short.c: New. diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-madd-double.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-madd-double.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0fe7824 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-madd-double.c @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +/* Verify that overloaded built-ins for vec_madd with + double inputs produce the right results. */ + +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok } */ +/* { dg-options "-mvsx -O2" } */ + +#include <altivec.h> + +vector double +testd_l (vector double vd2, vector double vd3, vector double vd4) +{ + return vec_madd (vd2, vd3, vd4); +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "xvmaddmdp|xvmaddadp" 1 } } */ + diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-madd-float.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-madd-float.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fcfe0c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-madd-float.c @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +/* Verify that overloaded built-ins for vec_madd with float + inputs produce the right results. */ + +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok } */ +/* { dg-options "-mvsx -O2" } */ + +#include <altivec.h> + +vector float +testf_l (vector float vf2, vector float vf3, vector float vf4) +{ + return vec_madd (vf2, vf3, vf4); +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "xvmaddmsp|xvmaddasp" 1 } } */ + diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-madd-short.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-madd-short.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0e78f35 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-madd-short.c @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +/* Verify that overloaded built-ins for vec_madd with short + inputs produce the right results. */ + +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_altivec_ok } */ +/* { dg-options "-maltivec -O2" } */ + +#include <altivec.h> + +vector signed short +test_mad_sss (vector signed short vss2, vector signed short vss3, + vector signed short vss4) +{ + return vec_madd (vss2, vss3, vss4); +} + +vector signed short +test_mad_suu (vector signed short vss2, vector unsigned short vus3, + vector unsigned short vus4) +{ + return vec_madd (vss2, vus3, vus4); +} + +vector signed short +test_mad_uss (vector unsigned short vus2, vector signed short vss3, + vector signed short vss4) +{ + return vec_madd (vus2, vss3, vss4); +} + +vector unsigned short +test_mad_uuu (vector unsigned short vus2, vector unsigned short vus3, + vector unsigned short vus4) +{ + return vec_madd (vus2, vus3, vus4); +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmladduhm" 4 } } */