Hi Richard,
The clzsi2/bsch patterns in the MN10300 backend do not work. There
are two problems - firstly the starting bit-search position for the
BSCH instruction is not set.
Yes it is. What do you think that "unused" second operand does?
That actually works ? Gross!
Secondly
On Jun 20, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> Variants of scan-assembler, used in the dg-final steps of a test, do
> not check that the output file exists, so it's reported as an error.
> With this patch, if the file is missing then the check is reported as
> unresolved using the same message
On Jun 15, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> The bug was in my attempt to run the tests with other -mfpu values, so
> I'm very glad you caught that. I tried again, getting rid of the neon
> requirement along the way, and found a way to run the VFP fp16 tests
> with any of the fp16 values th
On Jun 21, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> This patch causes dg-require-effective-target to return early if the
> test is already being skipped, saving some work. There's already
> similar code in dg-skip-if.
>
> OK for trunk, and later for 4.6?
Ok. Ok for 4.6. I'm not a huge fan of u
On Jun 25, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> [testsuite]
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01069.html
>> PR tree-optimization/48377, PR middle-end/49191
>> trunk/4.6
>> non_strict_align testsuite support
>
> Mike, Rainer, can one of you two take a look at this?
Done, re
On Jun 14, 2011, at 8:53 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 04:52:18PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>>> Well, Steve has a patch for non_strict_align effective_target
>>> in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00673.html
>>> (with s/strict_align/non_strict_align/g ), I was ho
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>> +#ifndef UNIQUE_UNWIND_CONTEXT
>
> The use of #ifndef seems to imply that this is a target macro, to be
> defined in libgcc_tm.h. In that case it should be documented, and
> poisoned in system.h und
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
> +#ifndef UNIQUE_UNWIND_CONTEXT
The use of #ifndef seems to imply that this is a target macro, to be
defined in libgcc_tm.h. In that case it should be documented, and
poisoned in system.h under the "only used for code built for the target"
case, and this:
Hello!
The maintainers of GCC in Fedora have split out libgnat.a and libgnarl.a to a
separate subpackage which is by default not installed together with the Gnat
tools. (Fedora has a policy to use only shared libraries as much as possible.)
This causes Gnatmake to crash when it tries to find the d
Hi,
just for those who are interested, this is quick&dirty patch adding another
pass of local optimization passes at WPA time. I've added early inliner and
IPA-SRA because I was curious how much of optimization oppurtunities we are
missing by limiting those to early pass.
With Early inlining it s
> [testsuite]
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01069.html
> PR tree-optimization/48377, PR middle-end/49191
> trunk/4.6
> non_strict_align testsuite support
Mike, Rainer, can one of you two take a look at this?
--
Eric Botcazou
Hi,
This is the last target independent patch for x32. I will start
submitting x86 specific patches in a week.
Given input:
(plus:SI (subreg:SI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 7 sp)
(const_int 16 [0x10])) 0)
(const_int -1 [0x]))
reloads tries to add
(subreg:SI (plus:DI (reg
Hi,
When reload gets:
(insn 588 587 589 28 (set (mem:DF (zero_extend:DI (plus:SI (subreg:SI
(reg/v/f:DI 182 [ b ]) 0)
(const_int 8 [0x8]))) [4 MEM[base: b_96(D), index:
D.15020_278, step: 8, offset: 0B]+0 S8 A64])
(reg:DF 340 [ D.14980 ])) spooles.c:291 106
{*movdf_in
On 06/25/2011 01:18 AM, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Alex, Hi Jeff, Hi Richard,
>
> The clzsi2/bsch patterns in the MN10300 backend do not work. There
> are two problems - firstly the starting bit-search position for the
> BSCH instruction is not set.
Yes it is. What do you think that "unuse
Hi,
I was informed that MEM_REF only works in ptr_mode. This patch changes
addr_for_mem_ref to use ptr_mode. OK for trunk?
Thanks.
H.J.
---
2011-06-25 H.J. Lu
PR middle-end/47383
* tree-ssa-address.c (addr_for_mem_ref): Use ptr_mode instead
of targetm.addr_space.ad
Hi,
This patch introduces UNIQUE_UNWIND_CONTEXT and properly saves/stores
registers with UNITS_PER_WORD > sizeof (void *) as suggested in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01526.html
OK for trunk?
Thanks.
H.J.
---
2011-04-09 H.J. Lu
PR other/48007
* unwind-dw2.c
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:18 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:55 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> + /* F
On 06/23/11 16:34, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> The patches provide a number of improvements:
>
> * Support for instructions that widen by more than one mode
>(e.g. from HImode to DImode).
>
> * Use of widening multiplies even when the input mode is narrower than
>the instruction uses. (e.g.
I committed the following patch as approved in the PR thread.
cheers
Iain
gcc/
PR driver/49371
* config/darwin.c (darwin_override_options): Improve warning when
mdynamic-no-pic is given together with fPIC/fpic, also warn when it
is given with fpie/fPIE.
* c
> All bootstraps completed without regressions, so I've installed the
> patch. I'll address eventual issues and further simplifications as a
> followup.
I cannot bootstrap SPARC64/Solaris anymore though:
/nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/sparc64-sun-solaris2.9/./gcc/xgcc
-B/nile.build/botcazou/gcc-
> > Ok.
>
> Committed revision 175396.
Please avoid posting messages like this. See http://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html:
"When you have checked in a patch exactly as it has been approved, you do not
need to tell that to people -- including the approver. People interested in
when a particular patc
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:38:20 +0200
Richard Guenther wrote:
> > ### patch against trunk 175201
> > Index: gcc/timevar.c
> > ===
> > --- gcc/timevar.c (revision 175201)
> > +++ gcc/timevar.c (working copy)
> > @@ -478,7
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> When cc1 report timing, the timing variable name has a too short width for df
> reg dead/unused notes:
>
> Execution times (seconds)
> phase setup : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 0%) wall
> 1
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Stubbs, Andrew
wrote:
> On 24/06/11 16:47, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> > I can certainly add checks to make sure that the skipped operations
>>> > actually don't make any important changes to the value, but do I need to?
>> Yes.
>
> Ok, I'll go away and do that t
Hi Alex, Hi Jeff, Hi Richard,
The clzsi2/bsch patterns in the MN10300 backend do not work. There
are two problems - firstly the starting bit-search position for the
BSCH instruction is not set. Secondly the BSCH instruction returns
the bit position of the highest set bit, not the number
25 matches
Mail list logo
