Hello,
$ date ; df -h
Wed Oct 10 10:39:20 CEST 2012
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 71G 47G 24G 67% /
tmpfs 7.9G 0 7.9G 0% /lib/init/rw
udev 10M 656K 9.4M 7% /dev
tmpfs 7.9G 0 7.9G
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:30:39AM +0800, Cheng Renquan wrote:
> For git trees, you can just clone one from remote gcc.git repository,
> and other
> two use local clone from the first one; this scheme costs 1 repository
> disk space
> (800MB) and 3 working tree disk space (<600MB),
>
> And for th
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:38:28PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 04/20/2010 03:31 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> >I am using 35GB on /home there. Is that too much? I am using 35GB atm.
> >(which is basically 3 git trees of gcc, one for pristine trunk, one for
> > the 4.5 branch and one to test a p
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:31 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems /home on gcc17 is full as of today:
>
> do...@gcc17:~$ date
> Tue Apr 20 21:26:03 CEST 2010
> do...@gcc17:~$ df -h
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda1 71G 37G 34G 52% /
>
On 04/20/2010 03:31 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> I am using 35GB on /home there. Is that too much? I am using 35GB atm.
> (which is basically 3 git trees of gcc, one for pristine trunk, one for
> the 4.5 branch and one to test a patch).
Hmm...for me, each additional workdir takes <600MB for the s
Hello,
It seems /home on gcc17 is full as of today:
do...@gcc17:~$ date
Tue Apr 20 21:26:03 CEST 2010
do...@gcc17:~$ df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 71G 37G 34G 52% /
tmpfs 7.9G 0 7.9G 0% /lib/init/rw
udev
> The power supply model we're looking for is supermicro pws-561-1h
> if you have one in your garage please contact me :).
No, but there's one on ebay
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/SuperMicro-Ablecom-PWS-561-1H-560W-1U-Power-Supply_W0QQitemZ200443521336QQcmdZViewItemQQptZCOMP_EN_Networking_Components?ha
Hi,
Thanks to Konrad Trifunovic from INRIA Saclay we have determined
that it's the power supply of gcc17 that has failed. I asked Konrad to
swap gcc16 and gcc17 power supply so gcc17 is now online and gcc16
offline.
This will allow people to get their data out of gcc17.
The power supply model we
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 15:36 +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 18:31 +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 22:32 +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> > > gcc4x and gcc5x in FSF France datacenter are off network
> > > because the DSL line has been cut yesterday at 19h35
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 18:31 +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 22:32 +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> > gcc4x and gcc5x in FSF France datacenter are off network
> > because the DSL line has been cut yesterday at 19h35 Paris time,
> > we are also trying to restore network ASAP (even
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 22:32 +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> gcc4x and gcc5x in FSF France datacenter are off network
> because the DSL line has been cut yesterday at 19h35 Paris time,
> we are also trying to restore network ASAP (even phone is no
> longer working...).
Hi,
After investigation the
Hi,
gcc16 is back online thanks to local admin actions but
gcc17 does not boot correctly, investigating.
gcc4x and gcc5x in FSF France datacenter are off network
because the DSL line has been cut yesterday at 19h35 Paris time,
we are also trying to restore network ASAP (even phone is no
longer w
Hi guys,
any new about gcc17? It is still not working?
Tobi
___
Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list
Gcc-cfarm-users@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gcc-cfarm-users
Dodji/ Tobias,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>
>
> I am not aware of the status of gcc16 though.
I was doing a few builds until a few minutes back on gcc16 and that
appeared to be alright .I wasn't doing much other than some
cross-builds and that appeared to be working
Hey Tobias,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:00:20AM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> I have troubles to log into gcc17. The nfs mount of gcc17 on gcc16 is
> also not working. Anybody knows what's the reason for this.
Laurent has said on IRC that gcc17 wouldn't reboot after a power
cycling. That might b
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 00:00 +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have troubles to log into gcc17. The nfs mount of gcc17 on gcc16 is
> also not working. Anybody knows what's the reason for this.
gcc17 is currently offline:
http://gna.org/support/?2473
Laurent
___
Hi,
I have troubles to log into gcc17. The nfs mount of gcc17 on gcc16 is
also not working. Anybody knows what's the reason for this.
Thanks a lot
Tobias
___
Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list
Gcc-cfarm-users@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gcc-cfarm
Hi,
Right now gcc17 is overloaded, the cause is:
20:22:39 up 60 days, 2:54, 17 users, load average: 32.39, 38.58, 40.23
jh 822 0.0 0.0 20156 10524 pts/0TOct21 0:00 make -j8
check-gcc
segher9393 0.0 0.0 6544 2436 pts/29 S+ 20:12 0:00 make -j16
jamborm 467
gcc17 is now up and running again and local admins
gave me the UPS configuration so I should be able
to power cycle the gcc16 and gcc17 machines remotely
in case it's needed.
Laurent
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 20:48 +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 11:37 -0500, NightStrike wrote:
>
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 11:37 -0500, NightStrike wrote:
> About an hour ago or so, gcc17 stopped responding, even from inside
> the network (ie, ssh gcc17 from gcc16).
Very likely a power cut, gcc15 and gcc16 came back online but not
gcc17, I'm pinging local admins.
Laurent
__
About an hour ago or so, gcc17 stopped responding, even from inside
the network (ie, ssh gcc17 from gcc16).
___
Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list
Gcc-cfarm-users@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gcc-cfarm-users
Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 01:18 -0400, NS wrote:
>
>> Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 05:36 -0400, NS wrote:
>>>
>>>
Seems that I can't get to gcc17 right now (about two days or so)
>>> Last ping as yesterday at 1
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 01:18 -0400, NS wrote:
> Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 05:36 -0400, NS wrote:
> >
> >> Seems that I can't get to gcc17 right now (about two days or so)
> >>
> >
> > Last ping as yesterday at 12h45, I asked local admin for a reboot.
> >
> > Laurent
> >
Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 05:36 -0400, NS wrote:
>
>> Seems that I can't get to gcc17 right now (about two days or so)
>>
>
> Last ping as yesterday at 12h45, I asked local admin for a reboot.
>
> Laurent
>
>
Still nothing...
_
From: "Laurent GUERBY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 05:36 -0400, NS wrote:
>> Seems that I can't get to gcc17 right now (about two days or so)
>
> Last ping as yesterday at 12h45, I asked local admin for a reboot.
>
> Laurent
Any progress with the i686 CFARM boxes? They've been un
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 05:36 -0400, NS wrote:
> Seems that I can't get to gcc17 right now (about two days or so)
Last ping as yesterday at 12h45, I asked local admin for a reboot.
Laurent
___
Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list
Gcc-cfarm-users@gna.org
https:/
Seems that I can't get to gcc17 right now (about two days or so)
___
Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list
Gcc-cfarm-users@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gcc-cfarm-users
My two cents:
IMH experience, if there isn't the slightest indication in the logs of
what went wrong, it is a power failure.
Robert
Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 13:01 +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>> I've contacted local people thursday but no news yet.
>
> They have rebo
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 13:01 +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> I've contacted local people thursday but no news yet.
They have rebooted gcc17 which is back online. Again
not the slightest indication of what went wrong in
the system logs...
Laurent
___
Gcc
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 14:20 +0400, Roman Rybalko wrote:
> Hi,
> What's up with gcc17?
> I see it's down for a week already.
> It's sad that such multi-proc-multi-core box is down :'-(
You still have gcc16 and gcc14 for 8 core machines :).
> I'm sure there is watchdog.
> Laurent, may be you might
Hi,
What's up with gcc17?
I see it's down for a week already.
It's sad that such multi-proc-multi-core box is down :'-(
I'm sure there is watchdog.
Laurent, may be you might set it up?
--
WBR,
Roman Rybalko
___
Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list
Gcc-cfarm-
On 6/5/08, Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 21:10 -0400, NightStrike wrote:
> > On 6/4/08, Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > gcc17 is currently unreachable since just before 1600pm UTC, I've pinged
> > > local admins but they might not read my email un
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 21:17 +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> gcc17 is currently unreachable since just before 1600pm UTC, I've pinged
> local admins but they might not read my email until tomorrow morning.
gcc17 is back online thanks to INRIA Saclay people. I've found
no trace of any explanation wha
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 21:10 -0400, NightStrike wrote:
> On 6/4/08, Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > gcc17 is currently unreachable since just before 1600pm UTC, I've pinged
> > local admins but they might not read my email until tomorrow morning.
>
> Should we be able to get to our gc
On 6/4/08, Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gcc17 is currently unreachable since just before 1600pm UTC, I've pinged
> local admins but they might not read my email until tomorrow morning.
Should we be able to get to our gcc17 home directories via gcc16? My
area on gcc16 is empty.
Als
gcc17 is currently unreachable since just before 1600pm UTC, I've pinged
local admins but they might not read my email until tomorrow morning.
Laurent
___
Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list
Gcc-cfarm-users@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gcc-cfarm-user
36 matches
Mail list logo
