On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:31 AM, Dodji Seketeli <do...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hello, > > It seems /home on gcc17 is full as of today: > > do...@gcc17:~$ date > Tue Apr 20 21:26:03 CEST 2010 > do...@gcc17:~$ df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sda1 71G 37G 34G 52% / > tmpfs 7.9G 0 7.9G 0% /lib/init/rw > udev 10M 52K 10M 1% /dev > tmpfs 7.9G 0 7.9G 0% /dev/shm > /dev/sdb1 459G 455G 4.4G 100% /home > gcc16:/home 459G 393G 66G 86% /n/16 > do...@gcc17:~$ > > I am using 35GB on /home there. Is that too much? I am using 35GB atm. > (which is basically 3 git trees of gcc, one for pristine trunk, one for > the 4.5 branch and one to test a patch). > I am freeing 2 of these 3 trees at the moment.
For git trees, you can just clone one from remote gcc.git repository, and other two use local clone from the first one; this scheme costs 1 repository disk space (800MB) and 3 working tree disk space (<600MB), And for the remote repo, I always prefer a shallow clone with "--depth 100" or 10 enough for patch generation, which repo (.git/) only cosumes <200MB disk, > > Dodji > > _______________________________________________ > Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list > Gcc-cfarm-users@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gcc-cfarm-users -- Cheng Renquan (程任全), Singapore _______________________________________________ Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list Gcc-cfarm-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gcc-cfarm-users
