--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-02-16 06:48
---
... because the attribute used to get translated to a volatile qualifier
on the function type, iirc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-02-20 17:07
---
Patch checked in. Related bugs remain, which should receive separate PRs.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-02-21 20:14
---
Subject: Re: UCNs not recognized in identifiers
(c++/c99)
"geoffk at geoffk dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Although I agree that these are all (except the below) nice things
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-02-21 20:23
---
Subject: Re: UCNs not recognized in identifiers
(c++/c99)
"geoffk at geoffk dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> The second half would a pp-number, instead. It is always t
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-02-21 20:54
---
Subject: Re: UCNs not recognized in identifiers
(c++/c99)
"geoffk at geoffk dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> The second half would a pp-number, instead. It is always t
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-24 16:06
---
Subject: Re: shared SH libgcc is exporting too many
symbols
Why not just add the problematic symbols to sh/libgcc-excl.ver? That
is what it is there for.
zw
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-24 18:46
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] shared SH libgcc is
exporting too many symbols
"joern dot rennecke at st dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Almost all the symbols in config/s
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-24 22:54
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] shared SH libgcc is
exporting too many symbols
"joern dot rennecke at st dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[LIB1FUNCS_ST]
> Won't this have th
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-24 23:54
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] shared SH libgcc is
exporting too many symbols
"joern dot rennecke at st dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So you are saying this needs to list
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-04-05 16:49
---
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR preprocessor/19475
Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> This patch fixes PR preprocessor/19475 by issuing just warning, not pedwarn,
> for < I
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-04-05 17:05
---
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR preprocessor/19475
Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:49:19AM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> > This patch fixes PR pre
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-04-05 23:39
---
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR preprocessor/19475
Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg00183.html
Yah, check that in already.
zw
--
http://gc
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-04-06 20:03
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] shared SH libgcc is
exporting too many symbols
"amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just had a look, and actually the
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|zack at codesourcery dot com|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20617
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-06-14 07:09
---
Subject: Re: libgcc2 compile causes internal error for mips-wrs-vxworks
The target will eventually be readded, but you might as well close the
bug - it hasn't shown up in our internal testing, so
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-12-16 02:16
---
Subject: Re: gcc and UCN in identifiers: bug PR 9449
Al Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, Zack.
>
> I'm looking into adding UCN support for identifiers into the HP
> C/C++ co
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-12-16 03:03
---
Subject: Re: UCNs not recognized in identifiers
(c++/c99)
Because of the ABI implications, I consider it completely unacceptable
to implement this feature according to the letter of C99 or C++98. Ever
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-02-09 02:28
---
I am testing a patch for this bug now.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-02-09 23:58
---
There is also p10769b.C (in the same directory) with exactly the same dubious
construct, this time marked as should-give-an-error. Do we want to keep that
one?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-10-13 23:29 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with previous
rename
Hmm. Why are we calling assemble_external before EOF?
zw
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-10-18 15:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Wrong precedence between equality (==, !=) and <
operators
I doubt that. I'd be inclined to point fingers at the
operator-precedence parser patch, myself.
zw
--
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-08 21:23
---
Subject: Re: __pic__/__PIC__ not defined when -fpic/-fPIC is specified
Ah. This is why I thought it had already been done. Maybe you want
to poke Alan Modra about the research he said he would do?
zw
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-23 22:19
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with
previous rename
"hjl at lucon dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- Additional Comments From hjl at
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-27 20:25
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with
previous rename
That's not what HJ's patch does, though.
zw
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17982
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-27 20:25
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] C4x fails miserably
I have no plans to do anything about this bug. Someone who cares
about C4x should look at it.
zw
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-28 20:16
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with
previous rename
You continue not to get it.
In this context, DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME has been set because
assemble_external has been
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-29 16:38
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with
previous rename
... so this has always been broken, is that what you're saying?
zw
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-29 17:15
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with
previous rename
I'm hoping to have some time to work on this this week, but no
promises.
zw
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
28 matches
Mail list logo
