------- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-04-05 17:05 ------- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR preprocessor/19475
Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:49:19AM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: >> > This patch fixes PR preprocessor/19475 by issuing just warning, not >> > pedwarn, >> > for < ISO C99 if there is no whitespace between macro definition and >> > replacement, but replacement starts with a basic character set character. >> > Ok to commit? >> >> OK except please remove the <?, >?, <?=, >?= testcases as those tokens >> are probably going to be removed in the near future. > > I know, but that IMHO shouldn't matter for the testcase. > #define a<? > should be still treated like > #define a <? > in C90 (with a warning), no matter whether <? is a cpp token or 2 tokens. Sure, but it's redundant with <= and so on. zw -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19475
