[Bug other/99288] xgettext does not get HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_UNSIGNED

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99288 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug translation/40883] [meta-bug] Translation breakage with trivial fixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883 Bug 40883 depends on bug 99288, which changed state. Bug 99288 Summary: xgettext does not get HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_UNSIGNED https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99288 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug testsuite/99292] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr98096.c -O0 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99292 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- IIRC it requires LRA, maybe add a dg target selector for LRA (or reload, that's likely smaller now)?

[Bug c/99295] [11 Regression] documentation on __attribute__((malloc)) is wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99295 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/99299] Need a recoverable version of __builtin_trap()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99299 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/99305] [11 Regression] range condition simplification after inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99305 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization,

[Bug libstdc++/99306] cross compiler bootstrap failure on msdosdjgpp: error: alignment of 'm' is greater than maximum object file alignment 16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99306 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-01 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/99309] [10/11 Regression] Segmentation fault with __builtin_constant_p usage at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99309 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/99310] [11 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types 'void (A::)(void*)' and 'void (A::)(void*)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99310 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug preprocessor/99313] ICE while changing global target options via pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99313 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- But this results in unexpected behavior when there's functions with arch=z13 vs. arch=z9 and depending on "luck" we then inherit the wrong params where we should not? That said, when unifying target/optimiz

[Bug c++/99318] [10/11 Regression] -Wdeprecated-declarations where non-should be?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99318 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.3 Keywords|

[Bug c/99323] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in add_hint, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:2234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99323 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 CC|

[Bug c/99324] ICE in mark_addressable, at gimple-expr.c:918

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99324 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-02 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c/99325] [11 Regression] ICE in maybe_print_line_1, at c-family/c-ppoutput.c:454

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99325 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/99326] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_build_dummy_array_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99326 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug debug/99334] Generated DWARF unwind table issue while on instructions where rbp is pointing to callers stack frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99334 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/99324] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in mark_addressable, at gimple-expr.c:918 since r6-314

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99324 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Wouldn't it be better to remove the mark_addressable call from build_va_arg > and call {c,cxx}_mark_addressable in the callers instead. Sure, or make it a langh

[Bug c/99340] -Werror=maybe-uninitialized warning with -fPIE, but not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99340 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- PIC allows interposing ags_midi_buffer_util_get_varlength and thus possibly initializing the argument. PIE does not allow this so we see it is not initialized. I suppose the change on the branch is for som

[Bug middle-end/99339] Poor codegen with simple varargs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99339 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/99339] Poor codegen with simple varargs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99339 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Btw, clang manages to produce the following, which shows the situation could be worse ;) test_va:# @test_va .cfi_startproc # %bb.0: subq$88, %rsp

[Bug middle-end/99339] Poor codegen with simple varargs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99339 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- So we could try to lower even va_start/end to expose the va_list meta fully to the middle-end early which should eventually allow eliding it. That would require introducing other builtins/internal fns to al

[Bug c/99340] -Werror=maybe-uninitialized warning with -fPIE, but not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99340 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- GCC 9 warns as well. I think this was a false negative which is now fixed. Note GCC 10.1.0 and GCC 10.2.0 warn for me as well, so something must have regressed this between 10.2.0 and g:eddcb627ccfbd97e025

[Bug middle-end/99339] Poor codegen with simple varargs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99339 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug inline-asm/99342] Clobbered register used for input operand (aarch64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99342 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/99343] Suggest: -H option support output to file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99343 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-03 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/99345] [11 Regression] ICE in doloop_contained_procedure_code, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2464

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99345 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/99347] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4549 since r9-6859-g25eafae67f186cfa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99347 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/99350] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99350 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/99355] -freal-X-real-Y -freal-Z-real-X promotes Z to Y

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99355 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |10.2.0 --- Comment #2 from Richard Bien

[Bug ipa/99357] Missed Dead Code Elimination Opportunity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99357 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-03 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/97897] ICE tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in compute_optimized_partition_bases, at tree-ssa-coalesce.c:1638

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97897 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.2.1 Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/98526] [10 Regression] Double-counting of reduction cost

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98526 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/98640] [10 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O1 and higher since r10-2711-g3ed01d5408045d80

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98640 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/99101] optimization bug with -ffinite-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99101 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/99101] optimization bug with -ffinite-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99101 --- Comment #23 from Richard Biener --- Just for the record we had the idea to apply the "bolt" of marking the latch control dependence (as done for possibly infinite loops) for loops containing stmts with side-effects. diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa

[Bug c/99363] [11 regression] gcc.dg/attr-flatten-1.c fails starting with r11-7469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99363 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-04 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/99369] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_expr, at fortran/resolve.c:7167

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99369 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/99372] gimplefe-28.c ICEs when sqrt insn is not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99372 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |11.0 Component|tree-optimizati

[Bug ipa/99373] unused static function not being removed in some cases after optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99373 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/99383] No tree-switch-conversion under PIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99383 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug tree-optimization/99383] No tree-switch-conversion under PIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99383 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/99383] No tree-switch-conversion under PIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99383 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- For the specific case of strings switch-conversion could also generate a combined string (with intermediate '\0's) and use a table of offsets into said string, thus doing a single relocation to the combined

[Bug middle-end/97855] [11 regression] Bogus warning locations during lto-bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97855 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug gcov-profile/99385] [11 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof-malloc.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99385 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/98856] [11 Regression] botan AES-128/XTS is slower by ~17% since r11-6649-g285fa338b06b804e72997c4d876ecf08a9c083af

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org K

[Bug c++/99386] std::variant overhead much larger compared to clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99386 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Is that clang++ using libstdc++ from GCC or libc++? In the end the difference might boil down to inlining decision differences.

[Bug tree-optimization/98856] [11 Regression] botan AES-128/XTS is slower by ~17% since r11-6649-g285fa338b06b804e72997c4d876ecf08a9c083af

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856 --- Comment #18 from Richard Biener --- There's another thing - we end up with vmovq %rax, %xmm3 vpinsrq $1, %rdx, %xmm3, %xmm0 but that has way worse latency than the alternative you'd get w/o SSE 4.1: vmovq %rax,

[Bug tree-optimization/98856] [11 Regression] botan AES-128/XTS is slower by ~17% since r11-6649-g285fa338b06b804e72997c4d876ecf08a9c083af

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856 --- Comment #19 from Richard Biener --- So to recover performance we need both, avoiding the latency on the vector plus avoiding the spilling. This variant is fast: .L56: .cfi_restore_state vmovdqu (%rsi), %xmm4 movq

[Bug tree-optimization/98856] [11 Regression] botan AES-128/XTS is slower by ~17% since r11-6649-g285fa338b06b804e72997c4d876ecf08a9c083af

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856 --- Comment #22 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #21) > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #20) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #18) > > > Even on Skylake it's 2 (movq) + 3 (vpinsr), so there it's 6 vs

[Bug tree-optimization/98856] [11 Regression] botan AES-128/XTS is slower by ~17% since r11-6649-g285fa338b06b804e72997c4d876ecf08a9c083af

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856 --- Comment #23 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 50300 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50300&action=edit preprocessed source of the important Botan TU This is the full preprocessed source of the TU. When compiled

[Bug tree-optimization/95401] [10 Regression] GCC produces incorrect instruction with -O3 for AVX2 since r10-2257-g868363d4f52df19d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95401 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #7) > How important is it that the test added for this PR be split into two > separate source files? > > I ask because, on targets that support vectors, but the vec

[Bug middle-end/99394] s254 benchmark of TSVC is vectorized by clang and not by gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99394 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- This is a loop-carried data dependence which we can't handle (we avoid creating those from PRE but here it appears in the source itself). I wonder how LLVM handles this (pre/post vectorization IL). Specifi

[Bug tree-optimization/99394] s254 benchmark of TSVC is vectorized by clang and not by gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99394 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/99395] s116 benchmark of TSVC is vectorized by clang and not by gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99395 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-05 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/99397] s152 benchmark of TSVC is vectorized by clang and not by gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99397 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |tree-optimization Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/98856] [11 Regression] botan AES-128/XTS is slower by ~17% since r11-6649-g285fa338b06b804e72997c4d876ecf08a9c083af

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856 --- Comment #26 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #25) > On Fri, 5 Mar 2021, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856 > > > > --- Comment #24 from Uroš Bizjak --

[Bug tree-optimization/98856] [11 Regression] botan AES-128/XTS is slower by ~17% since r11-6649-g285fa338b06b804e72997c4d876ecf08a9c083af

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856 --- Comment #29 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #27) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #26) > > but that doesn't seem to match for some unknown reason. > > Try this: > > (define_peephole2 > [(match_scrat

[Bug tree-optimization/98856] [11 Regression] botan AES-128/XTS is slower by ~17% since r11-6649-g285fa338b06b804e72997c4d876ecf08a9c083af

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856 --- Comment #33 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 50308 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50308&action=edit patch I am testing the following.

[Bug tree-optimization/98856] [11 Regression] botan AES-128/XTS is slower by ~17% since r11-6649-g285fa338b06b804e72997c4d876ecf08a9c083af

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856 --- Comment #35 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #33) > Created attachment 50308 [details] > patch > > I am testing the following. It FAILs FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512dq-concatv2di-1.c scan-assembler vpinsrq[^\

[Bug tree-optimization/99407] s243 benchmark of TSVC is vectorized by clang and not by gcc, missed DSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99407 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-08 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/99408] s3251 benchmark of TSVC vectorized by clang runs about 7 times faster compared to gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99408 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||53947 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/99409] s252 benchmark of TSVC is vectorized by clang and not by gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99409 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Blocks|

[Bug tree-optimization/99411] s311, s312, s31111, s31111, s3110, vsumr benchmark of TSVC is vectorized by clang better than by gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99411 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||53947 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/99412] s352 benchmark of TSVC is vectorized by clang and not by gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99412 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |tree-optimization Assignee|un

[Bug tree-optimization/99414] s235 benchmark of TSVC is vectorized better by icc than gcc (loop interchange)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99414 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/99415] s115 benchmark of TSVC is vectorized by icc and not by gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99415 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |tree-optimization Status|UN

[Bug tree-optimization/99416] s211 benchmark of TSVC is vectorized by icc and not by gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99416 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||53947 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/99419] possible missed optimization for dead code elimination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99419 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Version|unknown

[Bug ipa/99428] possible missed optimization for dead code elimination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99428 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |ipa Keywords|

[Bug c++/99445] [11 Regression] ICE in hashtab_chk_error, at hash-table.c:137 since r11-7011-g6e0a231a4aa2407b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99445 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug preprocessor/99446] [11 Regression] ICE in linemap_position_for_loc_and_offset, at libcpp/line-map.c:1005

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99446 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug lto/99447] [11 Regression] ICE (segfault) in lookup_page_table_entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99447 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/99451] [plugin] cannot enable specific dump for plugin passes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99451 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Yeah.

[Bug c++/99456] [11 regression] ABI breakage with some static initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99456 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Priority|

[Bug debug/99457] gcc/gdb -gstabs+ is buggy.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99457 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99459] [11 Regression] Many coroutines regressions on armv7hl-linux-gnueabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99459 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/98856] [11 Regression] botan AES-128/XTS is slower by ~17% since r11-6649-g285fa338b06b804e72997c4d876ecf08a9c083af

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856 --- Comment #36 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #35) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #33) > > Created attachment 50308 [details] > > patch > > > > I am testing the following. > > It FAILs > > FAIL: g

[Bug rtl-optimization/99462] New: Enhance scheduling to split instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99462 Bug ID: 99462 Summary: Enhance scheduling to split instructions Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optim

[Bug rtl-optimization/99462] Enhance scheduling to split instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99462 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization CC|

[Bug target/99461] [11 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2670 since r11-7526-g9105757a59b89019

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99461 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/98856] [11 Regression] botan AES-128/XTS is slower by ~17% since r11-6649-g285fa338b06b804e72997c4d876ecf08a9c083af

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856 --- Comment #37 from Richard Biener --- So my analysis was partly wrong and the vpinsrq isn't an issue for the benchmark but only the spilling is. Note that the other idea of disparaging vector CTORs more like with diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/

[Bug tree-optimization/99473] redundant conditional zero-initialization not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99473 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/99475] [10/11 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds accessing an array element of empty structs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99475 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/99487] [10 Regression] ICE during RTL pass: final in expand_function_start on hppa-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99487 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/97104] [11 Regression] aarch64, SVE: ICE in vect_get_loop_mask since r11-3070-g783dc66f9cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97104 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/97513] [11 regression] aarch64 SVE regressions since r11-3822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/99492] double and double _Complex not aligned consistently on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99492 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug other/99496] [11 regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_c.C ICEs after r11-7557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Priority|P3

[Bug target/99497] _mm_min_ss/_mm_max_ss incorrect results when values known at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99497 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > And another question is if we without -ffast-math ever create > MIN_EXPR/MAX_EXPR and what exactly are the rules for those, if it is safe to > expand those into

[Bug testsuite/99498] [11 regression] new test case g++.dg/opt/pr99305.C in r11-7587 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99498 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug c++/99500] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in cp_parser_requirement_parameter_list, at cp/parser.c:28828

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99500 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/99504] Missing memmove detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99504 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/99506] internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99506 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- This is a frontend issue, the FE produces an invalid static initializer for 'latt' (DECL_INITIAL): {(real(kind=8)) latt100[(integer(kind=8)) i + -1] / 1.0e+2, (real(kind=8)) latt100[(integer(kind=8)) i + -1

[Bug c++/99508] [11 Regression] Asm labels declared inside a function are ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99508 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Known to work|

[Bug gcov-profile/99512] New: Add counter annotation to allow store-data-races to be introduced with -fprofile-update=single

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99512 Bug ID: 99512 Summary: Add counter annotation to allow store-data-races to be introduced with -fprofile-update=single Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/64928] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Inordinate cpu time and memory usage in "phase opt and generate" with -ftest-coverage -fprofile-arcs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928 --- Comment #36 from Richard Biener --- So the issue is still the same - one thing I noticed is that store-motion also adds a flag for each counter update to avoid introducing store-data-races. -fallow-store-data-races mitigates that part and spe

[Bug gcov-profile/99512] Add counter annotation to allow store-data-races to be introduced with -fprofile-update=single

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99512 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Blocks|

[Bug tree-optimization/99510] [11 Regression] Compile time hog in build_aligned_type since r11-7123-g63538886d1f7fc7c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99510 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/99510] [11 Regression] Compile time hog in build_aligned_type since r11-7123-g63538886d1f7fc7c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99510 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Ah, OK. We're having a lot of vector CTORs we "vectorize" with load permutations like { 484 506 } and that runs into the pre-existing issue (there's a PR about this...) that we emit dead vector loads for al

[Bug tree-optimization/99510] [11 Regression] Compile time hog in build_aligned_type since r11-7123-g63538886d1f7fc7c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99510 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >