https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99340

--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 warns as well.  I think this was a false negative which is now fixed.

Note GCC 10.1.0 and GCC 10.2.0 warn for me as well, so something must have
regressed this between 10.2.0 and g:eddcb627ccfbd97e025cf366

I'm inclined to mark as INVALID.

Reply via email to