--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-06-24 01:48 ---
Subject: Re: loses type in debug info
On Jun 23, 2006, at 12:57 PM, Ilya N. Golubev wrote:
>
>> Next time please don't paste the preprocessed source in gccbug or
>> in the
>> comments secti
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-06-26 16:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] inliner introduces unnecessary type conversions
On Jun 26, 2006, at 6:45 AM, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #7 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-07-15 14:56 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared
On Jul 15, 2006, at 10:45 PM, ams at gnu dot org wrote:
> Because the rules in config.gcc say so:
And that is not why
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-12 18:01 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 Regression] System header files not found once -isystem
/usr/include is used
Hmm, shouldn't the preprocessor just mark the include as a duplicate?
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 12, 2008, at 8:
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-13 05:56 ---
Subject: Re: New: dbxout_expand_expr() doesn't check return value of
DECL_VALUE_EXPR()
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 12, 2008, at 8:11 PM, "d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com"
<[EMAIL PR
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-14 18:02 ---
Subject: Re: gcc source contains a struct with no data members (actually 1
byte in size) and compiler does not initialize it, resulting in IBM Rational
Purify reporting an Uninitialized Memory Read.
Sent from my
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-15 01:40 ---
Subject: Re: using fails if gcc invoked in a directory which has a
subdirectory called "gcc"
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 14, 2008, at 5:01 PM, "mvanier at cs dot caltech dot edu"
<[EMA
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-15 18:43 ---
Subject: Re: New: vim crashes on startup when compiled with -O3 but works
with -O2
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 15, 2008, at 10:05 AM, "dominique dot pelle at gmail dot com"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> w
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-15 21:51 ---
Subject: Re: New: --enable-checking=all times out during bootstrap
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 15, 2008, at 1:27 PM, "edwintorok at gmail dot com"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> I tried to bui
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-15 22:15 ---
Subject: Re: --enable-checking=all times out during bootstrap
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 15, 2008, at 1:59 PM, "edwintorok at gmail dot com"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comm
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-20 07:05 ---
Subject: Re: New: Inconsistent function results depending on irrelevant write
statement
I don't think INF is the same as infinity. It is most like implict
declared variable with an undefined value.
Sent fr
--- Comment #21 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-22 17:17 ---
Subject: Re: can't disable __attribute__((warn_unused_result))
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 22, 2008, at 7:42 AM, "thomas at mich dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
> --- C
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-30 19:29 ---
Subject: Re: Missing CSE/PRE for memory operations involved in virtual call.
I think this bug is invalid since the type can change via a placement
new which will change the vtable.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 30
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-12-10 11:20 ---
Subject: Re: Output code optimisation excessive use of builtins
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 10, 2008, at 2:51 AM, "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
> ---
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-12-15 21:39 ---
Subject: Re: Gcc misaligns arrays when stack is forced follow the x8632 ABI
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 15, 2008, at 1:33 PM, "whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu"
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #15 fr
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-12-15 23:02 ---
Subject: Re: Gcc misaligns arrays when stack is forced follow the x8632 ABI
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:01 PM, whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
wrote:
> LSB was merely the umbrella bringing together a bunch of pre-exist
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-12-29 00:49 ---
Subject: Re: toplevel configure script does not test for GNU Make
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 6:01 PM, bkorb at gnu dot org
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #2 from bkorb at gnu dot org 2008-12-28 23:01 ---
&
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-06 03:32 ---
Subject: Re: gcc 4.4.0 20090101 - gcc/config/i386/sol2-10.h uses "USE_GAS"
which is undefined
On Jan 5, 2009, at 7:01 PM, "rob1weld at aol dot com" wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #4 from
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-07 21:15 ---
Subject: Re: New: Incorrect warning/error when compiling with a typedef'ed
ptr return type
On Jan 7, 2009, at 12:44 PM, "gnu at bluedreamer dot com"
wrote:
> When a pointer to type is typedef&#x
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-07 21:39 ---
Subject: Re: New: %s substituted with regular word can't be properly
translated
Well template here might be consider the keyword template. So we
either have template argument or just argument. Translating tem
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-08 18:27 ---
Subject: Re: man page: -fschedule-insns documentation
On Jan 8, 2009, at 9:44 AM, "tim at klingt dot org" wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from tim at klingt dot org 2009-01-08 17:44
>
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-08 19:16 ---
Subject: Re: New: bogus 'changes meaning' error?
On Jan 8, 2009, at 4:22 AM, "pluto at agmk dot net" wrote:
> following code snipet is reducted testcase from external application.
> g+
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-11 00:11 ---
Subject: Re: Dist tarball is missing (Bison-generated) java/parse-scan.c
On Jan 10, 2009, at 3:59 PM, "rob1weld at aol dot com"
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot co
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-13 11:28 ---
Subject: Re: New: Diagnose and treat (-2.0)**2.0 properly
On Jan 13, 2009, at 3:08 AM, "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org"
wrote:
> Found at:
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/brow
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-13 19:22 ---
Subject: Re: New: gcj emitting incorrect code
On Jan 13, 2009, at 8:03 AM, "tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org"
wrote:
> I originally found this problem when trying to compile a Java
> package
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-16 11:46 ---
Subject: Re: loop iv detection failure
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 16, 2009, at 1:57 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org"
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-16 18:33 ---
Subject: Re: field-insensitive PTA causes libstdc++ miscompiles
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:30 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
>
> (void *)((intptr_t)&iptr + (intptr_t)p - (intptr_t)&iptr)
>
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-16 18:44 ---
Subject: Re: field-insensitive PTA causes libstdc++ miscompiles
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:37 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-22 09:17 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:398
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 22, 2009, at 1:00 AM, "bonzini at gnu dot org" wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #4 from bonzini at gnu dot or
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-23 04:24 ---
Subject: Re: New: CX isn't preserved with shift
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 22, 2009, at 5:54 PM, "hjl dot tools at gmail dot com"
wrote:
> On x86, CX is used for shift. If CX is used for a vari
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-23 04:39 ---
Subject: Re: CX isn't preserved with shift
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 22, 2009, at 8:34 PM, "hjl dot tools at gmail dot com"
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot c
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-24 22:33 ---
Subject: Re: if () block not true but a command in it is still in effect
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 24, 2009, at 2:24 PM, "jellegeerts at gmail dot com"
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #6 from jelle
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-26 11:12 ---
Subject: Re: New: Missing feature documentation
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 26, 2009, at 2:35 AM, "piotr dot wyderski at gmail dot com"
wrote:
> The website
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cx
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 11:08 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] NULL pointers always considered distinct
by PTA, even with -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 27, 2009, at 3:02 AM, "bonzini at gnu dot org&qu
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 11:27 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] missing constraints for pointers
accessed directly via their address
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 27, 2009, at 3:15 AM, "bonzini at gnu dot org" wrote:
>
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-29 17:53 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] wrong code building libgsf
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 29, 2009, at 2:01 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org"
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc do
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-30 02:41 ---
Subject: Re: New: Decimal floating-point exception flags done wrong
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 29, 2009, at 6:00 PM, "tydeman at tybor dot com"
wrote:
> Using gcc 4.3.2-7 on Intel Pentium 4 running
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-06-07 07:23 ---
Subject: Re: New: Array + XOR swap fails
Both of these are undefined. Look up about sequence point rules.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 7, 2009, at 12:15 AM, "ashutosh dot sharma dot 0204 at gmail
dot com&qu
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-06-17 13:12 ---
Subject: Re: -mno-sched-prolog breaks function parameter debug location lists
This option should just be removed.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 17, 2009, at 2:21 AM, "amodra at bigpond dot net dot au&qu
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-06-25 19:33 ---
Subject: Re: nop insertion does not look see restrict pointers
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 25, 2009, at 12:30 PM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org"
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #6 from rguenth at
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-07-04 01:38 ---
Subject: Re: New: Bus error caused by ldd/std instructions in struct copy.
This code is undefined because of alignment requirments differences
for the structs and the union.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 3, 2009, at 6
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-07-07 03:44 ---
Subject: Re: New: dereferencing type-punned pointer warnings cannot be
disabled
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 6, 2009, at 6:12 PM, "mikulas at artax dot karlin dot mff dot
cuni dot cz" wrote:
> Gcc be
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-07-07 03:48 ---
Subject: Re: dereferencing type-punned pointer warnings cannot be disabled
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 6, 2009, at 6:34 PM, "mikulas at artax dot karlin dot mff dot
cuni dot cz" wrote:
>
>
>
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-07-07 03:50 ---
Subject: Re: dereferencing type-punned pointer warnings cannot be disabled
Thus code is undefined you have an acess of a char array as a struct.
Yes you are only taking the address of an element but it is still
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-07-08 08:13 ---
Subject: Re: New: Optimizer handles loops with volatiles and post-incr. wrong
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 8, 2009, at 12:32 AM, "bastian dot schick at sciopta dot com"
wrote:
> If the following cod
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-07-24 05:54 ---
Subject: Re: New: O2 optimizes out assignment to bitfield
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 23, 2009, at 10:22 PM, "jim at bodwin dot us" wrote:
> Incorrect code is produced for the following sourc
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-08-23 15:16 ---
Subject: Re: remove_phi_node attempts removal
of a phi node resized by resize_phi_node
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 13:40 +, hosking at cs dot purdue dot edu
wrote:
>
> --- Comment #4 from hosking at
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-09-24 00:34 ---
Subject: Re: optimzation breaks floating point exception flag
reading
On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 23:02 +, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> In that case you have a bug that is not a duplicate of the l
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-10-14 18:08 ---
Subject: Re: Issues with -Wchar-subscripts
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 17:52 +, h dot b dot furuseth at usit dot uio
dot no wrote:
> > Also you forgot one thing '%' does not have to match up with the AN
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-10-14 18:26 ---
Subject: Re: [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as
template
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 18:25 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-10-15 03:29 ---
Subject: Re: g++ fails to overload on language linkage
On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 03:24 +, gcc-bugzilla at kayari dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #13 from gcc-bugzilla at kayari dot org 2006-10-15
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-01-28 19:04 ---
Subject: Re: newlib targets ICEs in
expand_builtin_int_roundingfn
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 14:22 +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-03-09 23:05 ---
Subject: Re: Revision 121302 causes 30% performance regression
On 9 Mar 2007 23:00:55 -, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Other than that, more precise alias information
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-03-19 17:52 ---
Subject: Re: pseudo-optimzation with sincos/cexpi
On 19 Mar 2007 12:43:49 -, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since sin() and cos() are non trivial functions, I am very surpri
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-03-23 07:57 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FRE ignores bit-field truncation (C and C++
front-end don't produce bit-field truncation
On 23 Mar 2007 05:01:00 -, spark at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-03-23 08:01 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FRE ignores bit-field truncation (C and C++
front-end don't produce bit-field truncation
On 3/23/07, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 23 Mar 2007 05:01:00 -
--- Comment #20 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 05:19 ---
Subject: Re: Cannot build cross compiler for Solaris: configure: error: Link
tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
On 17 Jul 2007 05:15:47 -, cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 10:26 ---
Subject: Re: Profiling not possible with -fopenmp
On 17 Jul 2007 10:24:12 -, jensseidel at users dot sf dot net
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An Open MPI related discussion about atomic operations happened
&
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-07-19 17:56 ---
Subject: Re: missed optimization after inline functions with multiple return
statements
On 19 Jul 2007 17:52:14 -, manuelle at ee dot ethz dot ch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> your testcase from bug 32810
--- Comment #20 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-07-25 09:12 ---
Subject: Re: wrong alignment or incorrect address computation in vectorized
code on Pentium 4 SSE
On 25 Jul 2007 08:40:09 -, dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> In the meantime,
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-07-26 16:51 ---
Subject: Re: warning for memset with zero size
On 26 Jul 2007 13:57:41 -, manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think that is a sensible feature request, am I missing some
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-06 12:43 ---
Subject: Re: missed memcpy -> movdqa optimization.
On 6 Aug 2007 12:42:18 -, pluto at agmk dot net
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> moreover i'm wondering why gcc uses movdqa for unaligned loads?
B
--- Comment #26 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-12 23:07 ---
Subject: Re: [win32] Using 'con' as assigned file generates Fortran runtime
error: File 'con' does not exist
On 12 Aug 2007 22:45:07 -, steven dot chapel at sbcglobal dot net
<[EMAIL PROTEC
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-19 21:39 ---
Subject: Re: -march=native is not supported under x86 darwin
On 19 Aug 2007 21:12:22 -, dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> x86 darwin should be able to re-use the implementation from
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-22 23:42 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr32912-[12].c (test for excess errors)
On 22 Aug 2007 23:39:50 -, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right. Would it be ok to make this de
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-23 18:49 ---
Subject: Re: vector float | vector float is accepted
On 23 Aug 2007 18:45:47 -, tbptbp at gmail dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your patch and documentation conflict . Fix either, at your convenience.
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-24 16:51 ---
Subject: Re: Local static variable in C++ constructor not visible for
debugging
On 24 Aug 2007 16:45:41 -, nikolay at totalviewtech dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you mean?
The IA64 C++ ABI
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-26 09:00 ---
Subject: Re: New: __imag operator drops side effects in subexpr
On 26 Aug 2007 05:21:22 -, sabre at nondot dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> to not call bar.
The problem is in c-typeck.c (build_unary_op
--- Comment #35 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-28 20:48 ---
Subject: Re: Unnecessary anonymous namespace warnings
On 28 Aug 2007 19:40:14 -, pluto at agmk dot net
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #34 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-08-28 19:4
--- Comment #37 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-28 22:11 ---
Subject: Re: Unnecessary anonymous namespace warnings
On 28 Aug 2007 21:41:05 -, bangerth at dealii dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's what I thought too at first, but the request is valid
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-29 00:56 ---
Subject: Re: GCC outputs invalid assembly when using -O2
On 29 Aug 2007 00:53:35 -, Hans dot Boehm at hp dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Based on Book 2, section 1.4 of the architecture manual,
--- Comment #39 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-29 08:52 ---
Subject: Re: Unnecessary anonymous namespace warnings
On 29 Aug 2007 03:15:04 -, bangerth at dealii dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is a good question in itself whether pimpl_ has a type at all
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-29 22:23 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] Missing last digit is some formatted output
On 29 Aug 2007 22:18:58 -, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FM406 gives:
>
> ...
>
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-30 18:35 ---
Subject: Re: GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase
> /var/tmp/43/gcc-4.3.0/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-abi/abi.exp.
> ERROR: could not compile testsuite_abi.cc
This was fixed by:
2007-08-30 Jakub J
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-30 18:44 ---
Subject: Re: [Regression 4.3] bus error compiling dqelg.f in scipy on intel
mac
On 30 Aug 2007 18:40:51 -, claumann at princeton dot edu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> build_classic_dist_vector_1 (ddr=0
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-09-02 13:26 ---
Subject: Re: New: Failed to warn uninitialized stack variable
On 2 Sep 2007 13:19:45 -, hjl at lucon dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] uninit-2]$ cat x.c
> typedef int mpz_t[1];
>
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-09-02 14:01 ---
Subject: Re: Failed to warn uninitialized stack variable
On 2 Sep 2007 13:56:13 -, hjl at lucon dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What does bar get back to? Are you saying if a pointer is passed to bar,
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-09-02 14:02 ---
Subject: Re: Failed to warn uninitialized stack variable
On 2 Sep 2007 13:58:23 -, hjl at lucon dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you can write such a function, I can pass you a pointer and y
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-09-04 19:08 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in fold_const.c (fold_convert) when reordering USE statements
On 4 Sep 2007 19:03:39 -, ubizjak at gmail dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and c never generates RECORD_TYPEs
Ye
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-09-24 15:53 ---
Subject: Re: New: Spurious warning in TRANSFER intrinsic in Sept 24 snapshot
of gfortran
On 24 Sep 2007 15:48:19 -, michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot
gov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I compile th
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-09-24 21:26 ---
Subject: Re: Spurious warning in TRANSFER intrinsic in Sept 24 snapshot of
gfortran
On 24 Sep 2007 19:59:37 -, sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington
dot edu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The programmer for
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-09-27 09:19 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] aggregate DSE disabled
On 27 Sep 2007 09:08:17 -, rguenther at suse dot de
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did wonder what optimized that before... (maybe a separate bug for
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-09-30 16:58 ---
Subject: Re: gcc 4.2.1 ignores GNU ld on Solaris 9
On 30 Sep 2007 14:32:32 -, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-10-02 23:59 ---
Subject: Re: Unhelpful diagnostic for incorrect pointer-to-member function
syntax
On 2 Oct 2007 23:54:04 -, jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Comment #6 from jwakely d
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-10-05 17:05 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] TER breaks some inline-asm code (again)
On 5 Oct 2007 10:58:10 -, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #4 from jakub at
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-10-08 16:34 ---
Subject: Re: parallel v3: do not use __builtin_alloca, use VLA
On 8 Oct 2007 14:56:18 -, bangerth at dealii dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> quicksort.h:68
> multiway_mergesort.h:142
>
> Benj
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-10-11 10:40 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 regression] Illegal instruction with build/genmddeps with
PPC405 build on powerpc
On 11 Oct 2007 10:28:03 -, tbm at cyrius dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So it's just a coinci
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-08-06 15:46 ---
Subject: Re: Bogus warning from GCC
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 6, 2008, at 8:39, "sam at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #2 from sam at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-08-07 05:48 ---
Subject: Re: Heisenbug: SVN of gcc throws internal compiler error on PPC
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 6, 2008, at 22:30, "contact at multimedia dot cx"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
--- Comment #38 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-08-10 18:22 ---
Subject: Re: [DR 325] GCC can't parse a non-parenthesized comma in a
template-id within a default argument
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 10, 2008, at 9:02, "manu at gcc dot gnu dot org"
<[EMAIL PR
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-08-11 10:25 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 regression] Ada bootstrap broken on i586-*-*
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 11, 2008, at 2:43, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
> ---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-08-11 10:26 ---
Subject: Re: New: ICE when compiling gmp 4.2.3
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 11, 2008, at 0:35, "linuxl4 at sohu dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> gcc -v
> gcc version 4.4.0 200808
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-08-13 05:44 ---
Subject: Re: New: possible integer codegen bug
Note for most targets not printing is correct as char is signed by
default but for most powerpc targets the opposite is true. You should
have explicted included signed
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-08-29 16:39 ---
Subject: Re: New: bad code generation with enum and -m32
This code is undefined as the value of 32 is outside the range of the
enum.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 29, 2008, at 9:29, "gmorin1 at bloomberg do
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-08-31 04:25 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] r139762 breaks libstdc++ build on darwin
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 30, 2008, at 21:18, "howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-09-01 10:43 ---
Subject: Re: bootstrap hangs in libstdc++
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 1, 2008, at 3:25, "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #4 from pa
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-09-01 20:41 ---
Subject: Re: -Os significantly faster than -O2 on test case
This is mostly because of extra register moves that IRA some times
introduces. There is another bug about Inline-asm and the return
register.
Sent from my
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-09-06 17:56 ---
Subject: Re: wrong-code on i486-linux-gnu with -O[12], -O0 works
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 6, 2008, at 10:42, "niklaus at gmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-09-07 20:10 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.3/4.4 regression] Invalid insn scheduling
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 7, 2008, at 9:47, "schwab at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> This is broken during sched2 p
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-09-13 09:49 ---
Subject: Re: New: attribute section is not working with constant strings
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 13, 2008, at 2:04 AM, "nm127 at freemail dot hu"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Wit
1 - 100 of 317 matches
Mail list logo
