------- Comment #37 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-28 22:11 ------- Subject: Re: Unnecessary anonymous namespace warnings
On 28 Aug 2007 21:41:05 -0000, bangerth at dealii dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's what I thought too at first, but the request is valid anyway as long > as you never use the pointer to the class from anywhere except the one > implementation file in which the class is defined. No it is not, it is still violating One definition rule as struct X will have a different member type for pimpl_ in each TU (this violates the whole idea of types being exported). This is going to be true no matter what, even if you change the warning. Now you can use a "void*" to get around this issue and should solve the issue and not violate the C++ ODR. This warning is not about style, it is about warning when you are most likely going to violat C++'s One definition rule with anonymous namespaces and you do violate it here as explained above. Thanks, Andrew Pinski -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29365
