[Bug lto/95572] lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_input_tree_ref, at lto-streamer-in.c:370

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95572 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug gcov-profile/95494] [11 regression] Several -fprofile-use tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95494 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/95365] [11 Regression] Broken gcov since r11-627-g1dedc12d186a1108

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95365 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- All right, I can live with the changed names of the files..

[Bug target/95602] [10/11 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95602 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/95570] ICE: Segmentation fault in vect_loop_versioning

||2020-06-09 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug tree-optimization/95569] ICE in tmmark：verify_ssa failed

|1 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirmed||2020-06-09

[Bug c++/95562] [10/11 Regression] ICE when using noexcept depending on boolean template parameter since r10-1280-g78f7607db4c53f8c

parameter ||since ||r10-1280-g78f7607db4c53f8c Last reconfirmed||2020-06-09 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95502] ICE in gfc_check_do_variable, at fortran/parse.c:4446

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95502 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/95501] ICE in gfc_match_pointer_assignment, at fortran/match.c:1422

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95501 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug sanitizer/95603] [11 Regression] sanitizer_linux.cpp:1880:16: error: missing terminating ' character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95603 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/95560] [10/11 Regression] ICE in comptypes, at cp/typeck.c:1498 since r10-4254-ge0d91792eec490d1

|1 CC||edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org, ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirmed||2020-06-09 Build|x86_64-w64-mingw32 | Summary

[Bug lto/95605] LTO and object files generated by dtrace -G

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95605 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/95560] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in comptypes, at cp/typeck.c:1498 since r10-4254-ge0d91792eec490d1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95560 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE

[Bug sanitizer/95617] [11 regression] many excess errors starting with r11-1117

||2020-06-09 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Sorry for the breakage. I've just pushed a fix for part of errors. Can you please paste chu

[Bug lto/95620] New: [10/11 Regression] relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against `.bss'

words: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- It's a

[Bug sanitizer/95617] [11 regression] many excess errors starting with r11-1117

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95617 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška

[Bug lto/95620] [10/11 Regression] relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against `.bss'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95620 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/95621] Add CET(PTA_SHSTK) to march=tigerlake

|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC||hjl at gcc dot gnu.org, ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug c++/95618] [11 Regression] ICE in remap_type_1, at tree-inline.c:607

|--- |FIXED CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Fixed on master with r11-1122-gef41587df9839d1d.

[Bug lto/95620] [10/11 Regression] relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against `.bss'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95620 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in the profiling data file, ICC does NOT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348 --- Comment #27 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to qinzhao from comment #24) > with the patch added to gcc11, I tested it with the small testing case, and > got the following data: > I would be more interested in overall statistics for your tra

[Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in the profiling data file, ICC does NOT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348 --- Comment #28 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Qing Zhao from comment #26) > > --- Comment #25 from Martin Liška --- > >> I will try to get more data on our real application. > >> > >> one question: why not just delete the entire records w

[Bug sanitizer/95617] [11 regression] many excess errors starting with r11-1117

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95617 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/92860] [8/9/10/11 regression] Global flags affected by -O settings are clobbered by optimize attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug analyzer/93993] ICE in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4786

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93993 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/95109] [11 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/gomp/target1.f90 after r11-349

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95109 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug sanitizer/94910] detect_stack_use_after_return=1 is much slower than clang's

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94910 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.0 Known to fail|

[Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in the profiling data file, ICC does NOT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348 --- Comment #30 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Qing Zhao from comment #29) > > > > And you still haven't replied to my essential question: Why can't you merge > > profiles into one directory during run? Or at least merge to a reasonable > >

[Bug tree-optimization/95627] New: [11 Regression] ICE in rs6000_density_test at rs6000.c:4992 since r11-1181-g371cc683371bedb0e53ebcee0c0e89604a1e74b1

: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: rguenth at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/95627] [11 Regression] ICE in rs6000_density_test at rs6000.c:4992 since r11-1181-g371cc683371bedb0e53ebcee0c0e89604a1e74b1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95627 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/95627] [11 Regression] ICE in rs6000_density_test at rs6000.c:4992 since r11-1181-g371cc683371bedb0e53ebcee0c0e89604a1e74b1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95627 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Com

[Bug bootstrap/95628] [11 regression] ICE in gcc build after r11-1181

|RESOLVED CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Dup. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 95627 ***

[Bug sanitizer/95634] New: [11 Regression] ICE in output_operand: invalid address mode

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc

[Bug sanitizer/95634] [11 Regression] ICE in output_operand: invalid address mode

|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Started with my g:8b6731e674c76cb48a417f2eef74ced92a17f469.

[Bug tree-optimization/95633] [11 regression] ICEs since r11-1143-gb05d5563f4be13b4a0d0951375a82adf483973c0

||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirmed||2020-06-11 Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug sanitizer/95634] [11 Regression] ICE in output_operand: invalid address mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95634 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Most likely a ptr_mode vs Pmode issue. Yep, I've got a working patch for it..

[Bug c/95635] -Warray-bounds falsely claims out-of-bounds access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95635 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug sanitizer/95634] [11 Regression] ICE in output_operand: invalid address mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95634 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in the profiling data file, ICC does NOT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348 --- Comment #33 from Martin Liška --- > > The profile directory generated by the new executable compiled with this > patch was 112G in size, a lot smaller than previous 1TB. That's quite a promising reduction. > Though still bigger than what

[Bug tree-optimization/95627] [11 Regression] ICE in rs6000_density_test at rs6000.c:4992 since r11-1181-g371cc683371bedb0e53ebcee0c0e89604a1e74b1

at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Let me fix that.

[Bug c++/95638] Legit-looking code doesn't work with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95638 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/95627] [11 Regression] ICE in rs6000_density_test at rs6000.c:4992 since r11-1181-g371cc683371bedb0e53ebcee0c0e89604a1e74b1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95627 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in the profiling data file, ICC does NOT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348 --- Comment #35 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Qing Zhao from comment #34) > > > >> Though still bigger than what ICC generated. > > > > Yep, but we should be only 2x bigger right now? > Yes, around 2-3 times bigger, much better now. Fine.

[Bug tree-optimization/95649] [11 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: cunroll since r11-1146-g1396fa5b91cfa0b3

||11.0 CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org, ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|ICE during GIMPLE pass: |[11 Regression] ICE during |cunroll |GIMPLE

[Bug sanitizer/94910] detect_stack_use_after_return=1 is much slower than clang's

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94910 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/95653] [11 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in gimple_bb (gimple.h:1847) with -ftree-loop-vectorize -fno-tree-scev-cprop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95653 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug tree-optimization/95653] [11 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in gimple_bb (gimple.h:1847) with -ftree-loop-vectorize -fno-tree-scev-cprop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95653 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/95671] Fails to build kernel 5.7 with -march=bdver{2,3,4} workaround -mno-tbm

||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Can you please attach a pre-processed file for an object that fails with objtool?

[Bug c++/95672] ICE in cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic, at cp/typeck2.c:584

|1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Is it an invalid code right?

[Bug c++/95675] internal compiler error: in build_over_call

|NEW CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org, ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, ||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirmed||2020-06

[Bug c++/95672] ICE in cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic, at cp/typeck2.c:584

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95672 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Keywords|

[Bug target/95671] Fails to build kernel 5.7 with -march=bdver{2,3,4} workaround -mno-tbm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95671 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Maxim Britov from comment #4) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > > Can you please attach a pre-processed file for an object that fails with > > objtool? > > Heh... I'm afraid I need s

[Bug target/95671] Fails to build kernel 5.7 with -march=bdver{2,3,4} workaround -mno-tbm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95671 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---

[Bug target/95671] Fails to build kernel 5.7 with -march=bdver{2,3,4} workaround -mno-tbm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95671 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug target/95671] Fails to build kernel 5.7 with -march=bdver{2,3,4} workaround -mno-tbm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95671 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- Yep, I've already created a reduced-testcase myself: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95671#c6

[Bug fortran/95690] [11 Regression] ICE in set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos, at emit-rtl.c:2092

||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, ||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirmed||2020-06-15 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Started with r11-963

[Bug fortran/95689] ICE in check_sym_interfaces, at fortran/interface.c:2015

, ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirmed||2020-6-15 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Started with r8-3955-g439d2350251a050f.

[Bug fortran/95688] ICE in gfc_get_string, at fortran/iresolve.c:70

|1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, ||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Started with r6-1958

[Bug fortran/95687] ICE in get_unique_hashed_string, at fortran/class.c:508

||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, ||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Started with r8-3056

[Bug sanitizer/95693] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Incorrect error from undefined behavior sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95693 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/95694] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:59 since r9-7156-g33579b59aaf02eb7

Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: law at gcc dot gnu.org, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug debug/95695] New: -gcolumn-info is unstable with LTO and --save-temps

Component: debug Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- It originally comes from: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172846 Richi reduced the

[Bug debug/95695] -gcolumn-info is unstable with LTO and --save-temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95695 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org Stat

[Bug debug/95695] -gcolumn-info is unstable with LTO and --save-temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95695 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- And it's not related to LTO, it comes from a pre-processor. So we somehow screw locations with -E and w/o -E option: $ g++ -g -O2 demo.C && readelf --wide --debug-dump=info a.out > 1 $ g++ -g -O2 demo.C --sav

[Bug debug/95695] -gcolumn-info is unstable with --save-temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95695 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in the profiling data file, ICC does NOT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #48660|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/95713] [10/11 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn when converting int2 vector to short2 vector for -march=skylake-avx512 since r10-5031-g78307657cf9675bc

||r10-5031-g78307657cf9675bc Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to fail||10.1.0, 11.0 Known to work||9.3.0 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in the profiling data file, ICC does NOT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED --- Comment #40 from Martin Lišk

[Bug tree-optimization/95717] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: vect: verify_ssa failed since r9-5325-gf25507d041de4df6

||2020-06-17 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, ||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Started with r9-5325-gf25507d041de4df6.

[Bug c++/95719] [11 Regression] ICE in lookup_vfn_in_binfo at gcc/cp/class.c:2459 since r11-954-g0ddb93ce77374004

Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org, ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Confirmed, started with r11-954-g0ddb93ce77374004. Thank you

[Bug c++/95723] GCC get confused while parsing a code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95723 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/95724] bogue error : "expected '{' before ')' token"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95724 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/95725] Confusing error diagnostic in an invalid template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95725 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/95723] GCC get confused while parsing a code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95723 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #2 from M

[Bug c++/95724] bogue error : "expected '{' before ')' token"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95724 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Haoxin Tu from comment #2) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > > For the next time, can you please add 'ice-on-invalid-code' keyword? > > I got it. So sorry for my mistake! It's not a

[Bug bootstrap/95734] [11 regression] lots of ICEs after r11-1445

||2020-06-18 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Sorry for the fallout, it's mine.

[Bug c++/95735] ICE on invalid non-type template argument

||2020-06-18 Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org, ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Started to ICE with r10-3735

[Bug c++/95724] bogue error : "expected '{' before ')' token"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95724 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > Note the testcase does not ICE so ice-on-invalid is wrong. It's really > a diagnostic only. If we want sth extra to distinguish error diagnostics > from warning

[Bug tree-optimization/95739] [11 Regression] Unordered comparison and VEC_COND_EXPR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95739 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/95739] New: [11 Regression] Unordered comparison and VEC_COND_EXPR

Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following is a fallout of r11-1445

[Bug target/95734] [11 regression] lots of ICEs after r11-1445

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95734 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/95745] [11 regression] O3-pr85794.c fails since r11-1445-g502d63b6d6141597bb18fd23c87736a1b384cf8f

|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Mine. Can you please add the author of a problematic commit to CC next time?

[Bug tree-optimization/95745] [11 regression] O3-pr85794.c fails since r11-1445-g502d63b6d6141597bb18fd23c87736a1b384cf8f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95745 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška

[Bug middle-end/95746] ice during GIMPLE pass: reassoc

|1 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirmed||2020-06-18 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Should be fixed on master, can you please re-check?

[Bug target/95753] [11 Regression] ICE when building the Linux Kernel for ARM64 (internal compiler error: ‘global_options’ are modified in local context)

||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed||2020-06-19 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- I'll take a look.

[Bug tree-optimization/95745] [11 regression] O3-pr85794.c fails since r11-1445-g502d63b6d6141597bb18fd23c87736a1b384cf8f

at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Ok, can I test it with a x86_64-linux-gnu cross compiler? Can you please provide exact command line for some of the problematic test-cases?

[Bug tree-optimization/95761] [11 regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: slp verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95761 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/95745] [11 regression] O3-pr85794.c fails since r11-1445-g502d63b6d6141597bb18fd23c87736a1b384cf8f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95745 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- All right, I see something very similar for s390x cross compiler: ./xgcc -B. /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/vector27.C -march=z13 -c during RTL pass: expand /home/marxin/Programming/gcc

[Bug middle-end/95830] [11 regression][MIPS/MSA] internal compiler error: in do_store_flag, at expr.c:12247 start with gcc-11-1445-g502d63b6d61

dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org CC|mliska at suse dot cz | Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2020-06-23 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Mine.

[Bug c/95777] Allow specifying more than one target options at the same time in target and target_clones attribute

|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ipa/95775] Command line argument for target_clones?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95775 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Hey. My opinion is similar to Richi's. If you really want a highly optimized library, you should rather use a dlopen mechanism with pre-built set of options.

[Bug tree-optimization/95761] [11 regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: slp verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95761 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- I see the test-cases fixed. Can you still reproduce that?

[Bug tree-optimization/95856] New: [11 Regression] error: definition in block 2 follows the use since r11-1582-gcf07eea8429c923b

Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Blocks: 26163 Target

[Bug tree-optimization/95856] [11 Regression] error: definition in block 2 follows the use since r11-1582-gcf07eea8429c923b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95856 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/95858] New: [11 Regression] gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_5.f90 fails since r11-1595-gabcde0a658e17dbb

: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Since the

[Bug middle-end/95746] ice during GIMPLE pass: reassoc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95746 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug target/95753] [11 Regression] ICE when building the Linux Kernel for ARM64 (internal compiler error: ‘global_options’ are modified in local context)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95753 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/92860] [8/9/10/11 regression] Global flags affected by -O settings are clobbered by optimize attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/92860] [8/9/10/11 regression] Global flags affected by -O settings are clobbered by optimize attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860 --- Comment #26 from Martin Liška --- One more arc-linux case: { OPT_LEVELS_SIZE, OPT_mcase_vector_pcrel, NULL, 1 }, { OPT_LEVELS_SIZE, OPT_msize_level_, NULL, 3 }, { OPT_LEVELS_SIZE, OPT_mmillicode, NULL, 1 }, { OPT_LEVELS_3_PLU

[Bug tree-optimization/92860] [8/9/10/11 regression] Global flags affected by -O settings are clobbered by optimize attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860 --- Comment #28 from Martin Liška --- > Confirmation sought that the stack backtrace I provided shows > that the problem is a bug in the pre-processor. No, the problem is in C parser. > > If so, -E isn't going to help. Please attach it.

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >