https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93993
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #5)
> (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #4)
> > The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm <dmalc...@gcc.gnu.org>:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ac3eb5c5f157bea22b5ae34b0df254d729dac25
> >
> > commit r10-7028-g4ac3eb5c5f157bea22b5ae34b0df254d729dac25
> > Author: David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com>
> > Date: Wed Mar 4 12:10:34 2020 -0500
> >
> > analyzer: add regression test for fixed ICE [PR94028]
> >
> > The C++ reproducer for PR analyzer/94028 generates a similar ICE
> > to that of the Fortran reproducer for PR analyzer/93993 and, like
> > it, was fixed by r10-7023-g3d66e153b40ed000af30a9e569a05f34d5d576aa.
> >
> > This patch adds the C++ reproducer as a regression test.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > PR analyzer/94028
> > * g++.dg/analyzer/pr94028.C: New test.
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/analyzer/pr93993.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
> Excess errors:
> /home/pault/gitsources/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/analyzer/pr93993.f90:21:
> 0: Warning: leak of 'tm' [CWE-401] [-Wanalyzer-malloc-leak]
>
> On current 10-branch. FC31/x86_64
>
> Paul
@David: The test-case is still failing. Are you planning to fix it or may I
mark it as xfail?
