https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94523
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Arnaud Giersch from comment #2)
> Hi,
>
> Faced with the same problem, I noticed that it fails only with -std=c++14
> (not with c++17, nor c++20).
Good point! I can only confirm that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94314
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-09
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Yes, it's very likely the PR Richi pointed to.
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, it's very old (at least 4.8.0+).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94314
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94495
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #9)
> This breaks aarch64 -mabi=ilp32.
>
> during RTL pass: vartrack
> In file included from
> ../../../../../../libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/pool_allocator.cc:31:
> /opt/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94582
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.3.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94570
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Last
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-14
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |yangyang305 at huawei
dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94574
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Target Milestone|---
||2020-04-14
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
@Jakub: Can we close this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94567
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94561
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2020-04-14
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Can you please attach pre-processed source file (-E option) and output of -v
option for the problematic
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-14
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed. I see it also with all starting from 6.1.0 where skylake-512 was
added. One can run it on a non
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94581
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Then let's close it as wontfix.
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to fail||10.0
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Summary|OVS compiled with gcc10 |OVS compiled with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94592
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #15)
> Martin, are you expecting this build to have 64 bit or 128 bit long doubles?
> The default should be 128 as it is natively but for some reason the cross
> compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #18 from Martin Liška ---
Maybe PR86684?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94596
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
|--- |10.0
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-15
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|ICE while using a concept |[10 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94495
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94603
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94598
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94570
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to John Selbie from comment #0)
> The following bug is unique to gcc and g++ running on Cygwin. I can repro
> this on both gcc 9.2 and 9.3.
>
> Using almost any source file, execute the following t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94570
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||10walls at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94570
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to John Selbie from comment #5)
> > All right, so it's normal Unix file system. Can you please show me output
> of the 'pwd' command?
>
> jselbie@IRONMAIDEN ~/bench
> $ pwd
> /home/jselbie/bench
Wh
: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94614
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-16
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94614
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> The testcase ICEs before the fix for PR94574, not sure how you bisected to
> the offending rev?
Isn't only aarch64 affected? I'm talking about arm-none-eabi-gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94614
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10 Regression] ICE in |ICE in
|emit_move_multi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94570
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Thank you jon.
I'm testing the patch and will send it soon to the GCC patches mailing list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94612
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94129
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> @Richi: Can you please enable zstd for our nvptx cross compiler:
>
> $ x86_64-suse-linux-accel-nvptx-none-gcc-10 -v
> ...
> Supported LTO compression algorithms: z
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94612
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Can you please paste output of:
$ /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10//accel/nvptx-none/mkoffload -v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94612
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #6)
> $ /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/accel/nvptx-none/mkoffload -v
> mkoffload: fatal error: COLLECT_GCC must be set.
> compilation terminated.
Then please:
$ ldd
at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94314
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-16
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary
,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-17
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to fail||10.0, 8.4.0, 9.3.0
Known to work||8.1.0
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94570
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||9.3.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
All right, thanks for the clarification. Btw. qemu fixed the warning in the
meantime:
https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu/commit/4ce1e15fbc7266a108a7c77a3962644b3935346e
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
It affects the build of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94632
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94612
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
Ok, I can reproduce it locally on openSUSE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94612
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
I've got a patch for it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94129
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94612
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew at blamsoft dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94612
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Failed to build simple |[10 Regression] Failed to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94612
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
|--- |11.0
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-17
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška
at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-20
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, working on that..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94659
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |
Summary|Missing symbol with L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94656
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90500
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yyc1992 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #22
||2020-04-20
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to fail||10.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|[10 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94645
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
|1
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-20
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, started with GCC 5.1.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94628
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #7)
> After adding this it seems to work for me, Patrick:
>case TYPE_ARGUMENT_PACK:
> if (value_dependent_expression_p(TREE_TYPE(*tp)))
> return *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94659
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
I've got a patch candidate, testing right now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94645
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to wo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94645
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94570
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94307
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
@Kees: Any update on kernel side?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #18 from Martin Liška ---
The code in ipa_polymorphic_call_context::set_by_invariant seems fishy. It's
there since the beginning: r5-3634-g6f8091fc3ed9d3cfa7a6dee7e9f9a34eb4308b2a.
@Honza: Can you please take a look?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94628
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
> How many times do you have to be told to test your patches? Besides,
> Patrick is already working on this PR.
As Marek said, it's really unpleasant to send untested patches and so come up
with noise in bu
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Fixed already.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 94582 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94582
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marvin_schmidt at gmx dot net
--- Comment
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-21
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Version|unknown |10.0
Summary|ice caused by
||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
||2020-04-23
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
|1
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-23
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed
,
||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94724
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
||10.0
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||prathamesh3492 at gcc dot
gnu.org
Summary|[10 Regression] internal|[10 Regression] internal
|compiler error: in
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-23
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Version|unknown |10.0
Target
-04-23
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to work||9.3.0
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||rsandifo
||2020-04-23
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||liujiangning at gcc dot
gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|Program crashes when|[10 Regression] Program
|compiled with GCC 10|crashes when compiled with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94726
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94762
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
|1
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-27
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Thank you for the report. Please send the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94780
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94780
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, started with r6-3632-gf6f69fb09c5f81df.
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Note that each switch contains an implicit default label which is missing in
your code. So your function invokes an undefined behavior (when you use the
return
||ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-27
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||7.4.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94779
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|RE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94659
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94659
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Summary|[8/9/10 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94822
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.0
Summary|ICE in lto with o
-g757bf1dff5e8cee3
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Known to fail||10.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed
|1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to fail||10.0
Last reconfirmed
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|ICE in poplevel, at |ICE in poplevel, at
|cp
401 - 500 of 15302 matches
Mail list logo
