[Bug c++/19985] New: executables created with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage segfault in gcov_exit ()

2005-02-15 Thread lothar at xcerla dot com
exit () Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: lothar at xcerla dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot or

[Bug middle-end/19985] executables created with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage segfault in gcov_exit ()

2005-02-15 Thread lothar at xcerla dot com
--- Additional Comments From lothar at xcerla dot com 2005-02-15 21:46 --- Created an attachment (id=8201) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8201&action=view) test case to reproduce the segfault This is a project of a small test case that reproduces the segme

[Bug middle-end/19985] executables created with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage segfault in gcov_exit ()

2005-02-28 Thread lothar at xcerla dot com
--- Additional Comments From lothar at xcerla dot com 2005-03-01 01:03 --- Changed severity to critical, as the compiler produces code that crashes when executing a coverage enabled executable. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/19985] executables created with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage segfault in gcov_exit ()

2005-02-28 Thread lothar at xcerla dot com
--- Additional Comments From lothar at xcerla dot com 2005-03-01 01:23 --- A bug that creates wrong code is critical for me. As our application depends on dynamically loading libraries, there's simply NO workaround for this bug. We can NOT execute any executables

[Bug c++/17781] add STL error message filtering

2004-10-01 Thread lothar at xcerla dot com
--- Additional Comments From lothar at xcerla dot com 2004-10-01 21:57 --- STLfilt does a pretty good job already. It would be a GREAT use to the average gcc user if gcc only could mimic the behaviour of STLfilt. I consider myself quite fluent with STL/templates but even I have

[Bug c++/17781] add STL error message filtering

2004-10-01 Thread lothar at xcerla dot com
--- Additional Comments From lothar at xcerla dot com 2004-10-02 00:58 --- Could you please state what "next C++" means (next standard, next version of gcc, ...). Actually I started this entry (with Severity: enhancement) to spawn a discussion about adding such aid to th