[Bug testsuite/120519] New: g++.target/powerpc/mvc-symbols1.C fail starting with r16-965-g83eee43e998d0a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120519 Bug ID: 120519 Summary: g++.target/powerpc/mvc-symbols1.C fail starting with r16-965-g83eee43e998d0a Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug testsuite/120805] gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-epil-4.c fail starting with r16-1645-g309dbcea2cabb3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120805 --- Comment #1 from Kishan Parmar --- make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="powerpc.exp=p9-vec-length-epil-*" gives below failures, Running CI/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/powerpc.exp ... FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-epil-4.c scan-

[Bug testsuite/120805] New: gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-epil-4.c fail starting with r16-1645-g309dbcea2cabb3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120805 Bug ID: 120805 Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-epil-4.c fail starting with r16-1645-g309dbcea2cabb3 Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug target/93738] [12/13/14/15/16 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93738 --- Comment #9 from Kishan Parmar --- I've went through the RTLs for both PowerPC LE and BE. Whether r3 is used or not now depends on the reload pass. In LE, reload often removes the extra copies added by combine. In BE, that extra instruction re

[Bug testsuite/120809] New: gcc.dg/analyzer/state-diagram-5.c fail starting with r16-1631-g2334d30cd8feac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120809 Bug ID: 120809 Summary: gcc.dg/analyzer/state-diagram-5.c fail starting with r16-1631-g2334d30cd8feac Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug testsuite/120826] New: [16 Regression] c-c++-common/asan/pr120608-*.c fail starting with r16-1626-g35a26f2ec55d20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120826 Bug ID: 120826 Summary: [16 Regression] c-c++-common/asan/pr120608-*.c fail starting with r16-1626-g35a26f2ec55d20 Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/120519] g++.target/powerpc/mvc-symbols1.C fail starting with r16-965-g83eee43e998d0a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120519 Kishan Parmar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/118890] ubsan bootstrap failure for powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118890 --- Comment #3 from Kishan Parmar --- I'm able to resolve nearly all the errors, except for the poly-int one. Thomas Koenig, could you please share the log showing how you're encountering that error?

[Bug testsuite/120519] g++.target/powerpc/mvc-symbols1.C fail starting with r16-965-g83eee43e998d0a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120519 --- Comment #2 from Kishan Parmar --- Created attachment 61578 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61578&action=edit List of assembly files for failed testcases.

[Bug testsuite/120519] g++.target/powerpc/mvc-symbols1.C fail starting with r16-965-g83eee43e998d0a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120519 --- Comment #3 from Kishan Parmar --- Compiler is configured with '../gcc/configure --with-cpu=power10 --enable-secureplt --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++ --no-create --no-recursion'

[Bug testsuite/120457] New: gcc.dg/vect/pr79920.c fail starting with r16-924-g1bc5b47f5b06dc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120457 Bug ID: 120457 Summary: gcc.dg/vect/pr79920.c fail starting with r16-924-g1bc5b47f5b06dc Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: testsuite-fai

[Bug target/93738] [13/14/15/16 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93738 Kishan Parmar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #11 from Kishan Par

[Bug gcov-profile/121123] New: [16 regression] some gcc.misc-tests/gcov-*.c fail starting with r16-2197-g385d9937f0e23c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121123 Bug ID: 121123 Summary: [16 regression] some gcc.misc-tests/gcov-*.c fail starting with r16-2197-g385d9937f0e23c Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/121045] [16 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr58552.C caused by r16-2197-g385d9937f0e23c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121045 --- Comment #4 from Kishan Parmar --- and more.. FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/pr116156-1.c -O1 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/pr116156-1.c -O2 (test for excess errors) FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/pr116156-1.c -O3 -fomi

[Bug fortran/120889] New: [16 regression] gfortran.dg/asan/array_constructor_1.f90 Fails since r16-1696-gdff66a690f6d47

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120889 Bug ID: 120889 Summary: [16 regression] gfortran.dg/asan/array_constructor_1.f90 Fails since r16-1696-gdff66a690f6d47 Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Stat

[Bug target/109116] vector_pair register allocation bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109116 Kishan Parmar changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug debug/121045] [16 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr58552.C caused by r16-2197-g385d9937f0e23c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121045 Kishan Parmar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kishan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/93738] [13/14/15/16 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93738 --- Comment #14 from Kishan Parmar --- Little Endian (insn 10 9 11 2 (set (reg:SI 124) (and:SI (subreg:SI (reg:DI 128 [ x ]) 0) (const_int 15728640 [0xf0]))) 200 {andsi3_mask} (insn 12 11 13 2 (set (reg:SI 126)

[Bug target/93738] [13/14/15/16 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93738 --- Comment #13 from Kishan Parmar --- Big Endian Target == (insn 10 9 11 2 (set (reg:SI 124) (and:SI (lshiftrt:SI (subreg:SI (reg:DI 129 [ x+-4 ]) 4) (const_int 12 [0xc])) (const_int 3840 [0xf00]))) 246 {*rot

[Bug target/118890] ubsan bootstrap failure for powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118890 --- Comment #7 from Kishan Parmar --- I sent a minor follow-up patch to add shift guards. That should wrap it up.

[Bug testsuite/121337] New: c-c++-common/musttail32.c fail starting with r16-2195-g89b9372d61ccd4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121337 Bug ID: 121337 Summary: c-c++-common/musttail32.c fail starting with r16-2195-g89b9372d61ccd4 Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: testsuit

[Bug target/93738] [13/14/15/16 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93738 --- Comment #16 from Kishan Parmar --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #15) > (In reply to Kishan Parmar from comment #13) > > Operand of 10 gets converted to below insn > > > > (and:SI (subreg:SI (lshiftrt:DI (reg:DI 129 [ x+-4 ])