--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
oduct: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gno
http://g
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-11 05:02
---
Intel agrees with gfortran:
fortcom: Error: foofoo.f90, line 25: The type/rank/keyword signature for this
specific procedure matches another specific procedure that shares the same
generic-spec. [FOO2]
use
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-12 01:24
---
I only have access to the free versions of Intel version 8.0 and version 9.0
and both gave aborted compilation on the test case for ambiguity.
Next step is to check the standards, which I presume Paul has done
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-12 02:25
---
Looking at the standard:
Looking in the F95 Standard:
" NOTE 12.4
The dummy argument names may be different because the name of a dummy argument
is not a characteristic. "
Also, allowing th
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 00:22
---
I will investigate.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 04:26
---
I have looked this over. Its a matter of what behavior is acceptable for each
type of error we get. My interpretation of your testcase is that we should do
a next_record when we detect the error before we do
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 06:25
---
Subject: Bug 26766
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Apr 13 06:24:58 2006
New Revision: 112914
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112914
Log:
2006-04-12 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 06:30
---
Subject: Bug 26766
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Apr 13 06:30:04 2006
New Revision: 112915
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112915
Log:
2006-04-12 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 07:20
---
The "engima" referred to in comment#2 is because it is a list directed read and
commas and spaces are deliminators. If you turn this into a read with a format
of '(a)' you get the whole
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 23:54
---
This is not a compiler bug.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-14 02:31
---
Subject: Bug 26890
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Apr 14 02:31:28 2006
New Revision: 112943
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112943
Log:
2006-04-14 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-14 02:36
---
Subject: Bug 26980
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Apr 14 02:36:49 2006
New Revision: 112944
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112944
Log:
2006-04-14 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-14 03:14
---
Testcase was committed to 4.1 branch as well, but I typoed the pr number so it
did not register commit here.
Fixed on 4.1 and trunk.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-14 03:16
---
Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-14 05:50
---
Created an attachment (id=11263)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11263&action=view)
Proposed Patch
This is a proposed patch you can try out while I work up a more complete test
cas
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-15 04:51
---
Subject: Bug 25336
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr 15 04:51:39 2006
New Revision: 112967
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112967
Log:
2006-04-15 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-15 04:52
---
Deleted duplicate file on trunk. No need to do so on any branches.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-15 07:15
---
I have the beginnings of a patch going. It covers formatted write to stdout.
Seems to work OK. I just need to extend the concept to the other cases.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 02:33
---
Subject: Bug 27138
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Apr 17 02:33:51 2006
New Revision: 112999
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112999
Log:
2006-04-14 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 02:37
---
Subject: Bug 27138
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Apr 17 02:37:15 2006
New Revision: 113000
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113000
Log:
2006-04-16 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 04:31
---
Subject: Bug 26766
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Apr 17 04:31:18 2006
New Revision: 113002
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113002
Log:
2006-04-16 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 04:34
---
Subject: Bug 26766
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Apr 17 04:33:59 2006
New Revision: 113003
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113003
Log:
2006-04-16 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 04:38
---
Fixed on 4.1 and trunk
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27191
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-18 03:51
---
I just found this already reported.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 27188 ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-18 03:51
---
*** Bug 27191 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-20 06:21
---
Created an attachment (id=11300)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11300&action=view)
tonto-1.0 input file stdin.h.uhf
With this attachment as input I get a successful output with to
--- Comment #20 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-20 06:25
---
Created an attachment (id=11301)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11301&action=view)
tonto-1.0 output for stdin.h.uhf
Here is the output from the above patch. When I go to stdin.h2o
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-21 03:47
---
Subject: Bug 27138
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Apr 21 03:47:23 2006
New Revision: 113131
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113131
Log:
2006-04-20 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-21 03:51
---
Subject: Bug 27138
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Apr 21 03:51:44 2006
New Revision: 113132
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113132
Log:
2006-04-20 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-21 03:53
---
Fixed on 4.1 and 4.2.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-22 01:17
---
Ignore this comment.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27253
--- Comment #21 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-22 04:48
---
I am able to compile with -g OK. Not sure what I was seeing the other night.
Here is a backtrace where I see a segfault:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x082c1c15 in __atom_module__n_bf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) at
f95files/atom.F90
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 02:05
---
Subject: Bug 20257
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Apr 23 02:04:58 2006
New Revision: 113190
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113190
Log:
2006-04-22 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 00:56
---
My experiance has been that if you have gfortran installed from a distribution
such as Fedora and you build your own later version of gfortran from source and
you do not configure the later version to install in
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 04:10
---
I am not sure (emphasis on not sure) I agree with this. But I can explain what
it is doing. It is correctly printing out the letter 'n' then its looking for
the first data item and finds the integer i
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 22:53
---
The standard reference seems clear. I will see about giving a runtime error.
Someone else will have to do the compile time magic.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27304
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-27 06:02
---
Tobias, I hope this is what you were looking for. I don't really think we need
a compile time check. That would be pretty involved to do and the error is
caught at runtime.
What do you think?
--
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-28 22:25
---
Here is valgrind report using allocate_zerosize.f90 as a testcase. This is
definitely a memory leak problem:
--4718-- supp: 13 dl_relocate_object
==4718== malloc/free: in use at exit: 21254 bytes in 131
: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27354
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-28 22:34
---
I see that one of these leaks has nothing to do with gfortran.
So maybe I have not captured anything related to this bug.
See PR27354 which I just submitted.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-28 23:55
---
Subject: Bug 27304
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Apr 28 23:55:30 2006
New Revision: 113363
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113363
Log:
2006-04-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-29 00:02
---
Subject: Bug 27304
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr 29 00:02:10 2006
New Revision: 113364
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113364
Log:
2006-04-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-29 04:27
---
Subject: Bug 20257
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr 29 04:27:09 2006
New Revision: 113373
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113373
Log:
2006-04-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-29 05:47
---
Fixed on Trunk and now 4.1 branch
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 00:12
---
I will look into this. Thought we had them all, but maybe not.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27360
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 01:15
---
Confirmed and i found the spot in read_logical. I will have a fix shortly. My
bad on this one.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 03:19
---
Subject: Bug 27360
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Apr 30 03:19:37 2006
New Revision: 113388
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113388
Log:
2006-04-29 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 19:53
---
Subject: Bug 27360
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Apr 30 19:53:41 2006
New Revision: 113396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113396
Log:
2006-04-30 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 19:55
---
Fixed on 4.1 and 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 20:59
---
Subject: Bug 27304
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Apr 30 20:59:08 2006
New Revision: 113397
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113397
Log:
2006-04-30 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 21:02
---
Subject: Bug 27304
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Apr 30 21:02:10 2006
New Revision: 113398
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113398
Log:
2006-04-30 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 21:02
---
Fixed on 4.1 and 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 00:02
---
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-05/msg0.html
Waiting for approval
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24459
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 05:01
---
With:
$ gfc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../main/configure --prefix=/home/jerry/gcc/usr
--enable-languages=c,fortran --disable-libmudflap
Thread model: posix
gcc version
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-05 00:13
---
I can not reproduce this here. I don't have that platform. I am guessing this
is a platform specific problem or a build problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27304
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-05 05:37
---
I would like to propose we close this bug. LAPACK has been working fine since
4.1. Any objections?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24993
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-05 05:40
---
Bud, unless you are going to chase this further I vote that you close this PR.
Was the patch going to go to 4.1 branch as well?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21130
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 23:46
---
Confirmed.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 06:48
---
Patch is on its way.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27575
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 00:16
---
I will investigate this a bit.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 00:37
---
Subject: Bug 27575
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed May 17 00:36:53 2006
New Revision: 113837
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113837
Log:
2006-05-16 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 00:41
---
Subject: Bug 27575
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed May 17 00:40:23 2006
New Revision: 113838
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113838
Log:
2006-05-16 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-18 03:49
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pr27652]$ ./a.out
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-18 05:10
---
also do something like this:
print "(5(f10))", a
you will get a new line after every 5 values printed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27652
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-18 05:16
---
Oops, I forgot the period. You need to match the width and precsion you want
printed. For complex maybe you want to use 6 or 8 instead of the 5 for repeat
count.
print "(5(f10.4))", a
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-20 02:56
---
I will fix the one in transfer.c as obvious.
I don't understand the issue in list_read.c I have a namelist patch pending
for that file so if someone could give me a hint I would be happy to fix that
as
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-20 03:30
---
Subject: Bug 22423
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat May 20 03:29:58 2006
New Revision: 113923
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113923
Log:
2006-05-19 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-20 07:15
---
Subject: Bug 24459
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat May 20 07:14:50 2006
New Revision: 113924
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113924
Log:
2006-05-20 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-20 07:20
---
Fixed on 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 01:56
---
Subject: Bug 24459
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun May 21 01:56:04 2006
New Revision: 113948
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113948
Log:
2006-05-20 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
ortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27704
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 13:48
---
Look in Changelog and you will see the most recent two in trunk have not gone
to 4.1 yet. The namelist patch for expanded reads does touch io.h
The other was a simple problem. I changed a return; to return
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 00:40
---
Dale,
I believe this is the correct use of update to get back to previous versions if
gcc is your main trunk directory and you were one directory above when you
invoked the command. You may want to check in
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 00:51
---
I will take a look at this one. This does seem odd. Can you tell us what
platform you are running on and what version of gfortran.
gfortran -v will tell us useful info.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 01:20
---
If you are running a gfortran straight from the FC 4 distribution it probably
does not have the latest fixes to the IO that we have in the 4.1 branch. These
have not been released yet. Release 4.1.1 is being
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 05:08
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27757
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 14:44
---
Maybe go back farther than the email I just posted to gfortran list suggests.
I am suspicious that this is not a gfortran problem, but then 4.1 is working.
Take a shot at an April 1 version maybe. You can
--- Comment #18 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-26 00:08
---
All of the IO patches for both revs, before and after the failures, exist in
4.1 and 4.2. 4.1 is not failing, so this leads me to believe this is not a
libgfortran failure.
There is an alignment patch that
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 02:35
---
The following patch causes no regressions. I can't reproduce the problem here,
but I have a hunch.
Ray, can you try this and see if it resolves the problem?
Thanks for tests and reports.
Index: io/trans
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 05:10
---
Here is some good news. I came up with a test case that fails with gfortran
and passes with intel. The bad news is that I have not fixed it yet. At least
I have something to work with now and its ugly
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 00:40
---
I am confirming this is a regression. The test program works fine on 4.0.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 05:19
---
Subject: Bug 24459
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon May 29 05:18:58 2006
New Revision: 114182
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114182
Log:
2006-05-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #20 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 05:22
---
Subject: Bug 24459
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon May 29 05:22:05 2006
New Revision: 114184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114184
Log:
2006-05-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #21 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 05:23
---
Fixed now on 4.1
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 19:29
---
Subject: Bug 27634
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon May 29 19:28:48 2006
New Revision: 114212
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114212
Log:
2006-05-29 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 19:34
---
Subject: Bug 27634
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon May 29 19:33:43 2006
New Revision: 114213
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114213
Log:
2006-05-29 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 19:39
---
Subject: Bug 27634
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon May 29 19:39:15 2006
New Revision: 114214
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114214
Log:
2006-05-29 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 19:42
---
Fixed on 4.2 only. Will not go to 4.1
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27634
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 20:49
---
Here is the fix folks. Unbelievable!
Index: io/unix.c
===
*** io/unix.c (revision 114207)
--- io/unix.c (working copy
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 23:40
---
Subject: Bug 27757
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon May 29 23:39:53 2006
New Revision: 114220
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114220
Log:
2006-05-29 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 23:43
---
Subject: Bug 27757
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon May 29 23:42:55 2006
New Revision: 114221
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114221
Log:
2006-05-29 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-30 02:51
---
Subject: Bug 27757
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue May 30 02:51:26 2006
New Revision: 114227
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114227
Log:
2006-05-29 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #18 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-30 02:54
---
Subject: Bug 27757
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue May 30 02:54:29 2006
New Revision: 114228
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114228
Log:
2006-05-29 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-30 04:04
---
No onjections.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-30 04:44
---
If someone wants this fix in 4.1, let me know, otherwise I will close this bug
shortly.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27575
--- Comment #19 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-30 23:02
---
Fixed on 4.1 and 4.1. Ray also confirmed by separate email that the original
application problem is fixed as well.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
1 - 100 of 3058 matches
Mail list logo
