[Bug c++/100796] [11 Regression] GCC does not honor #pragma diagnostic ignored when using the integrated preprocessor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100796 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/101029] unexpected error: non-constant condition for static assertion in gcc 10/11, but not 9 (clang also fine)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/101029] [10/11/12 regression] unexpected error: non-constant condition for static assertion in gcc 10/11, but not 9 (clang also fine)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Summary|unexpected error:

[Bug target/88529] G++ clears the return register on x86_64 when returning an empty class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88529 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/100796] [11 Regression] GCC does not honor #pragma diagnostic ignored when using the integrated preprocessor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100796 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 51012 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51012&action=edit fix Testing this fix now. Making a suitable testcase for the testsuite will be a bit tricky...

[Bug c++/101078] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Rejected code since r12-1272-gf07edb5d7f3e7721

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101078 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/101078] [9/10/11 Regression] Rejected code since r12-1272-gf07edb5d7f3e7721

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101078 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression]

[Bug c++/101078] [9/10 Regression] Rejected code since r12-1272-gf07edb5d7f3e7721

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101078 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression]|[9/10 Regression] Rejected

[Bug c++/101078] [9/10 Regression] Rejected code since r12-1272-gf07edb5d7f3e7721

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101078 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2

[Bug target/88529] G++ clears the return register on x86_64 when returning an empty class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88529 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/100796] [11 Regression] GCC does not honor #pragma diagnostic ignored when using the integrated preprocessor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100796 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/101098] [11/12 Regression] ICE in instantiate_body, at cp/pt.c:25858 since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101098 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- The ICE does not happen with -std=c++20.

[Bug c++/101040] [11/12 Regression] Internal compiler error: in get_or_insert_ctor_field, at cp/constexpr.c:3571 since r11-7980-gc3d3bb0f03dbd025

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101040 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/101106] [11/12 regression] =delete on second declaration of the same function produces a note with no error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101106 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/101182] New: [concepts] ICE with ++ in non-template requires-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101182 Bug ID: 101182 Summary: [concepts] ICE with ++ in non-template requires-expression Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/101040] [11/12 Regression] Internal compiler error: in get_or_insert_ctor_field, at cp/constexpr.c:3571 since r11-7980-gc3d3bb0f03dbd025

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101040 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 51060 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51060&action=edit bits dropped from the patch putting these here in case I want them later.

[Bug tree-optimization/104475] [12/13 Regression] Wstringop-overflow + atomics incorrect warning on dynamic object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104475 --- Comment #25 from Jason Merrill --- This was clarified for C++ last year by http://wg21.link/cwg2535 I notice that C warn_for_null_address also warns about &p->mem; I don't know where that is justified in the C standard.

[Bug debug/107965] libstdc++ Python Pretty-Printers: Many Exceptions From Uninitialized Structures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107965 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- The compiler could represent this with a location list instead of a single location. I guess implementing that would involve using NOTE_INSN_VAR_LOCATION instead of giving the variable DECL_RTL? This sound

[Bug c++/108496] [13 Regression] NRV ICE since r13-4469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108496 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/108496] [13 Regression] NRV ICE since r13-4469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108496 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/108195] [13 Regression] Incorrect implicit conversion when assigning initializer_list to std::vector since r13-4564-gd081807d8d70e3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108195 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/108195] [13 Regression] Incorrect implicit conversion when assigning initializer_list to std::vector since r13-4564-gd081807d8d70e3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108195 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/107303] [13 Regression] ICE: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3060 with nested __builtin_shufflevector() since r13-2978-g43faf3e5445b5717

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107303 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/107329] [13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:17118 since r13-2978-g43faf3e5445b5717

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107329 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/107267] [13 Regression] ICE in cp_gimplify_init_expr, at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:253 since r13-3175-g6ffbf87ca66f4ed9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/107267] [13 Regression] ICE in cp_gimplify_init_expr, at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:253 since r13-3175-g6ffbf87ca66f4ed9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/107303] [13 Regression] ICE: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3060 with nested __builtin_shufflevector() since r13-2978-g43faf3e5445b5717

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107303 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/107329] [13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:17118 since r13-2978-g43faf3e5445b5717

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107329 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/108503] [13 Regression] ICE in get_array_or_vector_nelts, at cp/constexpr.cc:4119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108503 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/108526] [13 Regression] ICE in start_preparsed_function, at cp/decl.cc:17281

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108526 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/108504] [13 Regression] ICE in cp_lexer_handle_early_pragma, at cp/parser.cc:675

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108504 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/108504] [13 Regression] ICE in cp_lexer_handle_early_pragma, at cp/parser.cc:675

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108504 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/108526] [13 Regression] ICE in start_preparsed_function with static on generic lambdas inside a template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108526 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/107484] [13 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in decls_match)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107484 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/108218] [12/13 Regression] Constant arguments in the new expression is not checked in unevaluated operand since r12-5253-g4df7f8c79835d569

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108218 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[Bug c++/108218] [12/13 Regression] Constant arguments in the new expression is not checked in unevaluated operand since r12-5253-g4df7f8c79835d569

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108218 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|SUSPENDED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/108559] [13 Regression] A new crash with using a simple class, inheritance and a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108559 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/108559] [13 Regression] A new crash with using a simple class, inheritance and a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108559 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > This might be related to C++ core issue cwg2403: https://wg21.link/cwg2403 Indeed. We don't expect the copy to be elided because of that issue, but we are elid

[Bug c++/108559] [13 Regression] A new crash with using a simple class, inheritance and a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108559 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87035] Add "note: used here" to permerror about redeclaration changing the meaning of a name at class scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87035 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Status|NEW

[Bug c++/103869] better diagnostics surrounding uses of -fms-extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103869 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/69836] compilation error with constexpr in template types with redeclared methods

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69836 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/69836] compilation error with constexpr in template types with redeclared methods

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69836 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4) > Here, the > problem looks to be that we're re-calculating the type of w_counter inside > the function definition (where the current function is in the overload se

[Bug c++/60512] would be useful if gcc implemented __has_feature similary to clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60512 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- CC|

[Bug c++/102529] ctad for aliases fails in the presence of constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102529 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/105841] [12/13 Regression] Change in behavior of CTAD for alias templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105841 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/105841] [12/13 Regression] Change in behavior of CTAD for alias templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105841 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 5 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5&action=edit fix Here's a patchset to implement the standard behavior plus the CWG2664 clarification. Mike, does this look

[Bug c++/84471] Debugger jumps back to lambda capture location every time a captured variable is odr-used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84471 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/107504] Debugger jumps back to structured binding declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107504 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/107897] [13 Regression] mangling conflicts with a previous mangle since r13-3601

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107897 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/108706] [13 Regression] Indefinite recursion when compiling gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call5.C w/ -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108706 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/108887] [13 Regression] ICE in process_function_and_variable_attributes since r13-3601

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108887 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/108773] [13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3058 compiling ceph since r13-4563-g1e1847612d7f169f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108773 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/108706] [13 Regression] Indefinite recursion when compiling gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call5.C w/ -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108706 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/108887] [13 Regression] ICE in process_function_and_variable_attributes since r13-3601

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108887 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3) > I think we may get around with only turning the node back to non-declaration > by calling n->reset()? It seems I also need to n->remove_from_same_comdat_group().

[Bug c++/108887] [13 Regression] ICE in process_function_and_variable_attributes since r13-3601

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108887 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Also, reset() is only defined in cgraph_node, and I need it to work on both functions and variables. Clearing n->type seems to confuse things that expect all symbols to be either function or variable.

[Bug c++/108773] [13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3058 compiling ceph since r13-4563-g1e1847612d7f169f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108773 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > /tmp/1.C:18:137: error: no match for ‘operator=’ (operand types are Curiously, changing #include to #include reproduces the ICE: #include #include #includ

[Bug c++/102529] ctad for aliases fails in the presence of constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102529 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/105841] [12 Regression] Change in behavior of CTAD for alias templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105841 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||13.0 Summary|[12/13 Regressi

[Bug c++/108773] [13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3058 compiling ceph since r13-4563-g1e1847612d7f169f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108773 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/108971] [13 Regression] ICE in tree_profiling, at tree-profile.cc:724

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108971 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC|

[Bug c++/107897] [13 Regression] mangling conflicts with a previous mangle since r13-3601

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107897 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/108972] [13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'error_mark' in compare_lambda_template_head, at cp/lambda.cc:1551 since r13-3601-g2b0e81d5c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108972 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/107168] [11/12/13 Regression] Wrong errors for concepts with default lambda not-type argument since r11-3714-gc1c62aec6751678e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107168 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/108542] [13 Regression] ICE in instantiate_type, at cp/class.cc:8833

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108542 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/108099] [12/13 Regression] ICE with type alias with `signed __int128_t`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108099 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/109065] [11/12/13 Regression] Type alias combination erroneously fails with "incomplete type"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109065 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/108566] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl with visibility' structure, have 'field_decl' in write_unqualified_name with anonymous struct inside an anonym

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108566 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/108566] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl with visibility' structure, have 'field_decl' in write_unqualified_name with anonymous struct inside an anonym

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108566 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- This is https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/139

[Bug c++/108099] [12 Regression] ICE with type alias with `signed __int128_t`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108099 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||13.0 Summary|[12/13 Regressi

[Bug c++/108566] [11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl with visibility' structure, have 'field_decl' in write_unqualified_name with anonymous struct inside an anonymous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108566 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE: |[11/12 Regression] ICE:

[Bug c++/108542] [13 Regression] ICE in instantiate_type, at cp/class.cc:8833

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108542 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/108972] [13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'error_mark' in compare_lambda_template_head, at cp/lambda.cc:1551 since r13-3601-g2b0e81d5c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108972 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/108179] [11/12/13 regression] ICE related to template template parameters in tsubst, at cp/pt.cc:15782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108179 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/107310] [12/13 Regression] "warning: control reaches end of non-void function" with a throw under a trivially-true conditional since r12-5638-ga3e75c1491cd2d50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107310 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/107310] [12 Regression] "warning: control reaches end of non-void function" with a throw under a trivially-true conditional since r12-5638-ga3e75c1491cd2d50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107310 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13 Regression] |[12 Regression] "warning:

[Bug c++/109065] [11/12/13 Regression] Type alias combination erroneously fails with "incomplete type"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109065 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- The problem is that r11-5825 assumes that if a type is dependent, its TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT and TYPE_CANONICAL are also dependent, which is not universally true: DataAlias is dependent, so that any errors from s

[Bug c++/109065] [11/12/13 Regression] Type alias combination erroneously fails with "incomplete type"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109065 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 54665 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54665&action=edit first try This fixes the PR, but breaks the modules tests that the earlier patch fixed. I guess we need a dif

[Bug c++/108468] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in most_specialized_partial_spec/builtin_guide_p in C++20 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108468 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org St

[Bug c++/108468] [11/12 Regression] ICE in most_specialized_partial_spec/builtin_guide_p in C++20 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108468 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE |[11/12 Regression] ICE in

[Bug tree-optimization/106238] [12/13 regression] Inline optimization causes dangling pointer warning on "include/c++/12.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106238 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/64587] [C++11] Wrong number of template arguments when template template parameter is template alias.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64587 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/108179] [11/12 regression] ICE related to template template parameters in tsubst, at cp/pt.cc:15782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108179 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13 regression] ICE |[11/12 regression] ICE

[Bug c++/109083] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Incorrect static_assert shown in diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109083 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 54673 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54673&action=edit first try Another approach would be to treat the expressions as different for the *_specializations hash table

[Bug c++/104618] [12 Regression] trunk 20220221 on x86_64-linux-gnu ICEs building sh.cc for sh4-linux-gnu (in build_call_a, at cp/call.cc:381)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104618 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/104618] [12 Regression] trunk 20220221 on x86_64-linux-gnu ICEs building sh.cc for sh4-linux-gnu (in build_call_a, at cp/call.cc:381)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104618 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/96780] debuginfo for std::move and std::forward isn't useful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96780 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug c++/96780] debuginfo for std::move and std::forward isn't useful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96780 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill --- I'm surprised that adding the "artificial" attribute didn't work; I thought the main point of that attribute was to automatically skip the function in the debugger/profiler. I guess that never got implement

[Bug c++/96780] debuginfo for std::move and std::forward isn't useful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96780 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14) From https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb/Skipping-Over-Functions-and-Files.html#Skipping-Over-Functions-and-Files it looks like you want skip -rf

[Bug libstdc++/104719] Use of `std::move` in libstdc++ leads to worsened debug performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104719 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/102586] [12 Regression] ICE in clear_padding_type, at gimple-fold.c:4798 since r12-3433-ga25e0b5e6ac8a77a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102586 --- Comment #28 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Qing Zhao from comment #27) > Does this issue only exist with -flifetime-dse=2? > When -flifetime-dse=2, the call to __builtin_clear_padding should be > inserted AFTER the start point of the co

[Bug c++/104476] [11 Regression] using-decl shadowed by member function when in incomplete-class context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104476 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[11 Regression] using-decl

[Bug c++/101767] [10/11/12 Regression] Aggregate initialization fails for struct that has both unnamed struct and union fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101767 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/102740] [10/11/12 Regression] Data member not found in struct inside an unnamed union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102740 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Assi

[Bug c++/103299] [11/12 Regression] accessing incorrect storage for designated init of anonymous union at constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103299 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/103337] rejects-valid brace elision inside designated initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103337 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Resolu

[Bug c++/101767] [11 Regression] Aggregate initialization fails for struct that has both unnamed struct and union fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101767 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[11 Regression] Aggregate

[Bug c++/102740] [11 Regression] Data member not found in struct inside an unnamed union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102740 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|11.3 Summary|[10/11/12 Regre

[Bug c++/103299] [11 Regression] accessing incorrect storage for designated init of anonymous union at constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103299 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|12.0| Summary|[11/12 Regression]

[Bug c++/102538] [11 Regression] Wrong narrowing conversion checking for initializer with union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102538 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org|jason at gcc dot gnu.org

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >