[Bug testsuite/55186] gcc.dg/const-uniq-1.c fails due to vector expected but not being in the constant pool

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55186 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug target/55218] armv6 doesn't use unaligned access for packed structures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55218 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-07 02:13:32 UTC --- (After reading the linked post.) Somewhat related: maybe the changes.html text should say "bootloader" or "startup code" instead of kernel because everyone just thinks it

[Bug testsuite/55229] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cunroll-1.c scan-tree-dump cunroll "Unrolled loop 1 completely"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55229 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/55257] New: [4.8 Regression]: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/non-virtual-thunk.C scan-assembler thunk.C:30

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55257 Bug #: 55257 Summary: [4.8 Regression]: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/non-virtual-thunk.C scan-assembler thunk.C:30 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/45051] [4.6 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-2.c and abs-3.c due to "track subwords of DImode allocnos"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45051 --- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-12-23 01:56:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (insn 3163 3161 3164 107 rectmm.c:1041 (set (reg:SI 1 r1) > (plus:SI (reg:SI 1 r1) >(const_int 280 [0x118]))) 4 {*arm_addsi3} (nil)) > I

[Bug rtl-optimization/45051] [4.6 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-2.c and abs-3.c due to "track subwords of DImode allocnos"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45051 --- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-12-23 14:29:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Nevertheless, I'm testing r162418 with your patch. FWIW, no regressions for cris-elf, with your patch (manually) applied on top of Bernds's patch appli

[Bug rtl-optimization/47166] [4.5 4.6 Regression] SpecCpu2000 Ammp segfaults for ARM with -O3 -mthumb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/47166] [4.5 4.6 Regression] SpecCpu2000 Ammp segfaults for ARM with -O3 -mthumb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166 --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-01-05 08:21:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #0) > > (insn 3163 3161 3164 107 rectmm.c:1041 (set (reg:SI 1 r1) > > (plus:SI (reg:SI 1 r1) > >(const_int 280 [0x11

[Bug rtl-optimization/47166] [4.5.2/4.6 Regression] SpecCpu2000 Ammp segfaults for ARM with -O3 -mthumb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166 --- Comment #16 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-01-19 20:30:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > the first one wasn't a regression and fixing the second may well > cause a third to pop up, you never know with reload. This is called RM... FWIW,

[Bug rtl-optimization/47166] [4.5/4.6 Regression] SpecCpu2000 Ammp segfaults for ARM with -O3 -mthumb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||41085 --- Comment #19 from Hans-Pete

[Bug c/47438] function arguments memory alignment problem.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47438 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug regression/57313] New: [4.9 Regression]: gcc.dg/binop-xor3.c scan-tree-dump-times

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: regression Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org CC: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org Host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Target: cris-axis-elf Created

[Bug regression/57313] [4.9 Regression]: gcc.dg/binop-xor3.c scan-tree-dump-times

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57313 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- Created attachment 30140 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30140&action=edit binop-xor3.s

[Bug regression/57473] FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/emutls-2.c (internal compiler error)

|x86_64-apple-darwin10 |x86_64-apple-darwin10 ||cris-elf Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-05-30 CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug regression/57473] FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/emutls-2.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- Seems to have been fixed with the "Symtab cleanups 2/17 - merge alias code" fix (r199577) or possibly with the same fix as for PR57467 (r199582).

[Bug middle-end/55030] [4.8 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memcpy-chk.c execution, -Os (et al)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030 --- Comment #17 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #16) > FWIW, I've bootstrapped and regtested gcc 4.9 with r192676 reapplied and the > dse.c and cselib.c hunks of r193802 reverted on several hosts (x86_64, >

[Bug regression/57551] New: [4.9 Regression]: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE

: normal Priority: P3 Component: regression Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org CC: hubicka at ucw dot cz With revision 199692 this test passed. >From revision 199702 and on, this test has failed as foll

[Bug regression/57551] [4.9 Regression]: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57551 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/57583] large switches with jump tables are horribly broken on m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #3) > It's not too difficult to make the m68k backend use 32-bit offsets in its > jump tables (adjust CASE_VECTOR_MODE, ASM_OUTPUT_ADDR_DIFF_ELT, > ASM_RETURN_C

[Bug target/57583] large switches with jump tables are horribly broken on m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583 --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #5) > The assembler already handles jump targets that are too far away (via the > BROKEN_DOT_WORD hack), this issue is about growing the table itself too > large s

[Bug c/57621] attribute error is interpreted even if it is switched with __builtin_constant_p on -Og

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57621 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug regression/57766] New: [4.9 Regression]: gcc.sum c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/sec_implicit_ex.c

Priority: P3 Component: regression Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org CC: bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org Host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Target: cris-axis-elf This test previously passed

[Bug tree-optimization/57701] Incorrect optimisation of inlined function with inline assembly when cross-compiling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57701 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug regression/57766] [4.9 Regression]: gcc.sum c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/sec_implicit_ex.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57766 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- Looks like the same situation as PR57692.

[Bug middle-end/55030] [4.8 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memcpy-chk.c execution, -Os (et al)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030 --- Comment #19 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #18) > Let's just reapply r192676 on the mainline. We just need to make sure that > the failures on i686 don't reappear. Done now less than half a year later! (J

[Bug regression/57766] [4.9 Regression]: gcc.sum c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/sec_implicit_ex.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57766 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/58145] New: [Regression]: volatileness of write is discarded, perhaps in "lim1" related to loop optimizations

NCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org Target: cris-*-*, crisv32-*-* Created attachment 30640 --> http:

[Bug middle-end/58145] [Regression]: volatileness of write is discarded, perhaps in "lim1" related to loop optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145 --- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Created attachment 30653 [details] > gcc49-pr58145.patch > > Updated patch. Thank you very much, Jakub! The missing opportunity to learn trees :) is offset

[Bug middle-end/58145] [Regression]: volatileness of write is discarded, perhaps in "lim1" related to loop optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Target|cris-*-*, crisv32-*-* | --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nils

[Bug lto/58084] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr8081.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (internal compiler error)

gcc dot gnu.org Component|regression |lto Summary|FAIL: |[4.9 Regression] FAIL: |gcc.dg/torture/pr8081.c |gcc.dg/torture/pr8081.c |-O2 -flto |-O2 -flto |-fno-use

[Bug middle-end/58096] [4.9 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/attr-alias.c fails with r201439

, |x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, |x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, |i386-pc-solaris2.10 |i386-pc-solaris2.10, ||cris-axis-elf CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson

[Bug fortran/57904] [4.9 Regression] Bogus(?) "invokes undefined behavior" warning with Fortran's finalization wrapper (gfortran.dg/class_48.f90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57904 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/58084] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr8081.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58084 --- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- For the record, I'm logging the following regression for cris-axis-elf in this PR as well, because: 1: It's lto 2: The regression is observed introduced in the same interval locally: (201466:201470] 3: Wh

[Bug regression/58221] New: [4.9 Regression]: Immense amount of execution regressions and increased test-time for cris-elf

Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: regression Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org Host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Target: cris-axis-elf I see a LOT of

[Bug regression/58221] [4.9 Regression]: Immense amount of execution regressions and increased test-time for cris-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58221 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- No significant change in results for regress-446 -> regress-444 for r201882 from r201874 (some libstdc++ changes pass again, but others now fail). Maybe r201883 is the winner; checking.

[Bug regression/58221] [4.9 Regression]: Immense amount of execution regressions and increased test-time for cris-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58221 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2013-08-23 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/58243] New: Suboptimal structure initialization with tree-sra

Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org CC: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org Created attachment 30700 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30700&acti

[Bug middle-end/58096] [4.9 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/attr-alias.c fails with r201439

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58096 --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- This is fixed for cris-elf in (201978:202144] apparently r202111 as also obvious from the message at gcc-patches. It's probably fixed everywhere. Can Pat the reporter or Jan the fixer please verify and

[Bug target/49202] MMIX: Wrong debugging information generated (UNKNOWN: length 2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49202 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/49202] MMIX: Wrong debugging information generated (UNKNOWN: length 2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49202 --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-08-16 01:37:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > I'm also going > to open a binutils bug and crossref this PR.

[Bug fortran/50094] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_6.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50094 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-08-16 20:07:56 UTC --- Is this PR more than a trivial typo? Hm, so this PR is in the assigned state but not yet assigned to anyone? What's up with that?

[Bug c++/50296] [4.7 Regression] New C++ test failures

CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-09-05 19:56:15 UTC --- I see the FAIL: 20_util/tuple/moveable2.cc (test for excess errors) WARNING: 20_util/tuple/moveable2.cc compilation failed to produce executable for cris-elf too

[Bug c++/50296] [4.7 Regression] New C++ test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50296 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz --- Comment

[Bug c++/50311] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: SIGSEGV in cx_check_missing_mem_inits (semantics.c:5808) with variadic template

||hp at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-09-06 19:48:09 UTC --- Matches behavior and revision range so I'll go ahead and call it. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 50296 ***

[Bug tree-optimization/50272] A case that PRE optimization hurts performance

||2011-09-08 CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org Ever Confirmed|0 |1

[Bug target/48974] VIS intrinsics improvement opportunities

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48974 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-09-22 01:25:13 UTC --- For an example of working around (2), see .

[Bug target/48974] VIS intrinsics improvement opportunities

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48974 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/48974] VIS intrinsics improvement opportunities

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48974 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/50607] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/bconstp-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50607 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-10-03 23:09:44 UTC --- For cris-elf too (unsurprisingly as the error seems universal), plus I'm seeing a: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c compilation, -O2 -flto (internal compiler error) gcc.l

[Bug middle-end/50609] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c compilation, -O2 -flto (ICE)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50609 Bug #: 50609 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c compilation, -O2 -flto (ICE) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 St

[Bug middle-end/50607] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/bconstp-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50607 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-10-04 00:04:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > On x86 linux the testcase does not cause segfaults, so may be you could > investigate via gdb which function cause segfault on cris-elf. I cloned this

[Bug middle-end/50609] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c compilation, -O2 -flto (ICE)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50609 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-10-04 00:22:11 UTC --- Last known working revision:first known failing 179447:179464, and 179462 is the only related change in that range, so it's confirmed that's the revision exposing or causing this

[Bug middle-end/50609] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c compilation, -O2 -flto (ICE)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50609 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-10-04 01:50:59 UTC --- So, at r179480, I get, for lto1 and everything related rebuilt with CFLAGS=-g3: (gdb) set args -melf -quiet -dumpdir /tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/cris-elf/gccobj/gcc/testsuite/gcc/ -dump

[Bug middle-end/50609] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c compilation, -O2 -flto (ICE)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50609 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Target||cris-axis-elf Status|UNC

[Bug middle-end/50609] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c compilation, -O2 -flto (ICE)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50609 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter N

[Bug middle-end/50609] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c compilation, -O2 -flto (ICE)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50609 --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-10-04 15:32:22 UTC --- Created attachment 25411 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25411 Same patch, just as an attachment, for those that want to re-use it. In testing now. Will know

[Bug middle-end/50609] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c compilation, -O2 -flto (ICE)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50609 --- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-10-04 20:05:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg00230.html This patch fixed the gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c regression for cris-elf. Thanks! (So did

[Bug middle-end/50607] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/bconstp-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50607 --- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-10-06 07:04:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > bconstp-3.c failure is fixed with the commit 179588. > > The problem of vect-shuffle tests should be resolved by commit 179564. Confirmed gone tested

[Bug middle-end/50607] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/bconstp-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50607 --- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-10-06 12:39:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > There is still a problem on arm: vect-shuffle-2.c and vect-shuffle-5.c fail > with ICE at all optimization levels above -O0 (other vect-shuffle-*.c tes

[Bug middle-end/50638] [4.7 Regression] emulated TLS fails

||2011-10-07 CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-10-07 00:34:21 UTC --- For cris-elf too, another emutls target. The full build-gcc.sh regression list

[Bug middle-end/50638] [4.7 Regression] emulated TLS fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-10-07 00:39:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > For cris-elf too, another emutls target. > The full build-gcc.sh regression list for cris-elf at r179625 (last known > working at r179611): Sorry, I fo

[Bug middle-end/50640] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_12.f03 -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/50840] gcc_update can't find SVN revision in Mercurial tree

||hp at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-10-27 04:26:42 UTC --- Close as per comment 1. I think "yes" but please ask on the gcc@ list.

[Bug regression/50999] New: [4.7 Regression]: g++.dg/lto/20081109 execute -O2 -flto -flto-partition=1to1 -fno-use-linker-plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50999 Bug #: 50999 Summary: [4.7 Regression]: g++.dg/lto/20081109 execute -O2 -flto -flto-partition=1to1 -fno-use-linker-plugin Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/50640] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_12.f03 -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2011-10-15 00:00:00 |2011-11-06 0:00 --- Comment #10 from

[Bug middle-end/50640] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_12.f03 -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640 --- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-11-06 17:47:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > second > I would prefer to see the bug fixed Certainly. > rather than hidden by any of the above. It wouldn't be hidden by xfailing it, as the xfai

[Bug middle-end/50640] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_12.f03 -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640 --- Comment #17 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-11-06 20:02:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > From comment #3 I infered that the usual suspect is r179618. Hans-Peter are > you > sure about you range in comment #8? You're right, my mistake, so

[Bug regression/50999] [4.7 Regression]: g++.dg/lto/20081109 execute -O2 -flto -flto-partition=1to1 -fno-use-linker-plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50999 --- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-11-07 21:24:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Created attachment 25734 [details] > proposed patch > > Hm, on x86_64 the EH table is not empty (look at g++.dg/lto/20081109_1.C, > the usual symtom is

[Bug regression/50999] [4.7 Regression]: g++.dg/lto/20081109 execute -O2 -flto -flto-partition=1to1 -fno-use-linker-plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50999 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-11-08 04:01:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Does the attached patch help? It tries to start to address the (yet unsolved) > issue of preserving lang-dependent options. It does fix this regressio

[Bug regression/51038] New: [4.7 Regression]: 29_atomics/atomic_flag/clear/1.cc test_and_set/explicit.cc implicit.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51038 Bug #: 51038 Summary: [4.7 Regression]: 29_atomics/atomic_flag/clear/1.cc test_and_set/explicit.cc implicit.cc Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug regression/51043] New: [4.7 Regression]: g++.dg/lto/20100423-3 cp_lto_20100423-3_0.o assemble, -flto -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51043 Bug #: 51043 Summary: [4.7 Regression]: g++.dg/lto/20100423-3 cp_lto_20100423-3_0.o assemble, -flto -g Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status

[Bug regression/51044] New: [4.7 Regression]: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_class_2.f90 -O1 ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51044 Bug #: 51044 Summary: [4.7 Regression]: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_class_2.f90 -O1 ICE Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/51044] [4.7 Regression]: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_class_2.f90 gfortran.dg/widechar_intrinsics_10.f90 -O1 ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51044 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug regression/51051] New: [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf building libstdc++-v3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051 Bug #: 51051 Summary: [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf building libstdc++-v3 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/51051] [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf building libstdc++-v3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug target/53156] New: [4.8 Regression]: gcc.target/cris/peep2-andu2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53156 Bug #: 53156 Summary: [4.8 Regression]: gcc.target/cris/peep2-andu2.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization

[Bug target/53156] [4.8 Regression]: gcc.target/cris/peep2-andu2.c

||2012-04-29 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |hp at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1

[Bug middle-end/53089] [4.8 Regression] gfortran.dg/coarray/atomic_1.f90 and gfortran.dg/coarray/registering_1.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53089 --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-04-29 06:07:51 UTC --- Looks fixed to me. H.J. or Honza, close?

[Bug target/53156] [4.8 Regression]: gcc.target/cris/peep2-andu2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53156 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-04-29 06:59:14 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Sun Apr 29 06:59:09 2012 New Revision: 186940 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186940 Log: PR target/53156 * config/cris/cris.md (an

[Bug target/53156] [4.8 Regression]: gcc.target/cris/peep2-andu2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53156 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-04-29 07:00:16 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Sun Apr 29 07:00:01 2012 New Revision: 186941 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186941 Log: PR target/53156 * gcc.target/cris/peep2-a

[Bug target/53156] [4.8 Regression]: gcc.target/cris/peep2-andu2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53156 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug regression/53149] [4.8 Regression]: gcc.dg/20011021-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53149 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/38412] asm-declared register misnamed when feeding asm, "almost" misallocated.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38412 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Version|4.3.3

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/movbe-2.c and gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug regression/53203] New: [4.8 Regression]: gcc.dg/setjmp-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53203 Bug #: 53203 Summary: [4.8 Regression]: gcc.dg/setjmp-1.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/movbe-2.c and gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 --- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-05-02 22:22:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > I contacted iant before I started this, and he said that the proper plan > is to use the rtl cost model. So that is what we did. The alternative > is

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/movbe-2.c and gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 --- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-05-02 22:27:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Actually, I think that's what rtlanal.c:rtx_cost should be changed to do, for > the cases where the targetm.rtx_costs function returns false. ...and no

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 --- Comment #21 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-05-06 23:25:40 UTC --- All this should be taken care of by the default rtx costs; I don't think any target patches should be needed for these targets at least not for this case. The default should be

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 --- Comment #22 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-05-06 23:28:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) Hopefully it was obvious, but: > ... where natural_set_cost is the cost of > setting a register (possibly the default) ... for the UNITS_PER_WORD cas

[Bug target/53272] New: wrong condition-codes for strict-low-part destination and small-integer source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53272 Bug #: 53272 Summary: wrong condition-codes for strict-low-part destination and small-integer source Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.7 Status:

[Bug target/53272] wrong condition-codes for strict-low-part destination and small-integer source

||2012-05-08 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |hp at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-05-08 00:11:03 UTC --- Created attachment 27337

[Bug tree-optimization/53273] New: test-cases suffer from cross-function optimizations with no way to mark limits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53273 Bug #: 53273 Summary: test-cases suffer from cross-function optimizations with no way to mark limits Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug target/53272] wrong condition-codes for strict-low-part destination and small-integer source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53272 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-05-08 15:20:56 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Tue May 8 15:20:52 2012 New Revision: 187283 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187283 Log: PR target/53272 * config/cris/cris.c (cri

[Bug target/53272] wrong condition-codes for strict-low-part destination and small-integer source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53272 --- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-05-08 15:21:55 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Tue May 8 15:21:50 2012 New Revision: 187284 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187284 Log: PR target/53272 * gcc.dg/torture/pr53272-

[Bug target/53272] wrong condition-codes for strict-low-part destination and small-integer source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53272 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-05-08 15:27:08 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Tue May 8 15:27:03 2012 New Revision: 187285 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187285 Log: PR target/53272 * config/cris/cris.c (cri

[Bug target/53272] wrong condition-codes for strict-low-part destination and small-integer source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53272 --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-05-08 15:28:02 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Tue May 8 15:27:58 2012 New Revision: 187286 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187286 Log: PR target/53272 * gcc.dg/torture/pr53272-

[Bug target/53272] wrong condition-codes for strict-low-part destination and small-integer source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53272 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2 --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter

[Bug target/53272] wrong condition-codes for strict-low-part destination and small-integer source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53272 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/53273] test-cases suffer from cross-function optimizations with no way to mark limits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53273 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-05-08 23:24:15 UTC --- Created attachment 27350 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27350 preprocessed file with just the (previously) miscompiled function This is basically gcc.dg/tort

[Bug tree-optimization/53273] test-cases suffer from cross-function optimizations with no way to mark limits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53273 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-05-08 23:41:41 UTC --- Created attachment 27351 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27351 Like i2.i (attachment 27350) but with main and auxiliary functions, and always aborting This at

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >