http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54490
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Severity|major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37942
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868
--- Comment #5 from Eric Weddington
2011-10-20 14:36:01 UTC ---
Hi Johann,
I would prefer if the name of the address space for program memory be named
"__flash" so that way it is the same name as what the IAR compiler uses. Using
the same name a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52488
--- Comment #8 from Eric Weddington
2012-03-13 05:37:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> ../../../../../../gcc-4.7.0-RC-20120302/newlib/libc/posix/glob.c:206:1: error:
> allocating 2050 bytes of stack is more than 'at90s2313' can provide
> make
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37165
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51050
--- Comment #2 from Eric Weddington
2011-12-01 12:36:23 UTC ---
Johann,
Is this a duplicate of your bug #51345?
||eric.weddington at atmel
||dot com
Resolution||WONTFIX
--- Comment #3 from Eric Weddington
2011-12-01 12:43:35 UTC ---
This issue should go away when address spaces are done for the avr target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2011-07-27 00:00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48715
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42976
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37895
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44643
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48896
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
||eric.weddington at atmel
||dot com
Resolution||WONTFIX
--- Comment #1 from Eric Weddington
2010-11-02 18:39:59 UTC ---
The -mint8 option also does not work with building avr-libc. There has been
||eric.weddington at atmel
||dot com
Severity|enhancement |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44501
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |eweddington at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45263
--- Comment #10 from Eric Weddington
2010-12-05 19:52:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Is R15 used anywhere else in startup code that might not obey the register
> save
> conventions (ie does do_global_ctors need to preserve R15)
I strong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2011-04-20 00:00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49487
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
--- Comment #1 from Eric Wedding
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49487
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261
--- Comment #10 from Eric Weddington
2011-06-27 05:43:20 UTC ---
Hi All,
Johann is correct in his comment to bug #46261 (below).
The -mint8 compiler switch is now causing the compiler to give an ICE.
We need to finally make a decision from one
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261
--- Comment #14 from Eric Weddington
2011-06-27 21:49:18 UTC ---
>
> Two things to consider:
>
> . Regardless of whether someone votes to remove an option, a segfault
> should always be analyzed. It's easy enough to otherwise just hide
> a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18145
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39212
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2011.07.11 18:53:40
CC||eric.weddington at atmel
||dot com
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Eric Weddington
2011-07-11 18:53:40 UTC ---
Stefan, does
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49017
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever Confirmed|1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14118
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric.weddington at atmel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43690
--- Comment #9 from Eric Weddington
2011-07-12 02:58:20 UTC ---
Patches were committed some time ago. Does this bug need to be marked as
RESOLVED FIXED?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44506
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38159
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
||2011.07.14 18:29:55
CC||eric.weddington at atmel
||dot com
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.3.3, 4.6.1, 4.7.0
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687
--- Comment #2 from Eric Weddington
2011-07-14 18:41:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 24758
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24758
Test case results using GCC 4.3.3 (WinAVR 20100110)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49629
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46278
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2011-07-07 00:00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49807
--- Comment #2 from Eric Weddington
2011-07-21 20:12:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> This C source:
>
> #define SPDR (*((char volatile*) 0x2c))
Hi Johann,
That's not quite correct. In avr-libc the header file sfr_defs.h will define a
reg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49313
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric.weddington at atmel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47509
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric.weddington at atmel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46898
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric.weddington at atmel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49881
--- Comment #1 from Eric Weddington
2011-07-27 23:13:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Created attachment 24848 [details]
> Hack to set ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS
>
> While looking at PR49864 I noticed some awful code.
>
> First, the argument
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49903
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|AVR: Redundant comparisons |[avr] Redundant comparisons
42 matches
Mail list logo