http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #31 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-09-05 09:45:08 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-09/msg00025.html
clock ticking;-(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54462
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-05
11:46:24 UTC ---
Indeed the patch in comment #1 fixes the PR without regression.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #33 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-09-05 12:31:06 UTC ---
> Er, did you read comment #26?
Do comments #24 and #25 answer this question?
> Jack says the configure test is being run with
> clang, which if true looks like a bug.
It i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #35 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-09-05 12:59:09 UTC ---
> No, the #c24 and #c25 comments make no sense at all.
My only claim is that they allow to bootstrap again my platform of choice.
> In void f(void) { asm ("rdrand %eax"); } r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #47 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-09-06 16:01:09 UTC ---
The test in comment #20 is
/* end confdefs.h. */
int
main ()
{
void f(void){asm("rdrand %eax");}
;
return 0;
}
I have compiled it with clang 1.7 and gcc 4.4.6, 4.5.3, 4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #49 from Marc Glisse 2012-09-06
16:24:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #47)
> I think this answer the concern expressed by Marc in comment
> #29: the bootstrapping compiler is not used for the tests in
> libstdc++-v3/configure
Thank y
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54184
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-06
17:06:07 UTC ---
What about gcc.dg/pr52558-2.c and gcc.dg/tm/reg-promotion.c not handled by the
patch posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00390.html?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #55 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-09-09 15:21:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comments #53 and #54)
> Please post the patch to the right list and I'll approve it, all libstdc++
> patches need to go to the libstdc++ list.
>
> I've tested the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54522
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-09
15:27:29 UTC ---
The test case with -O -fno-automatic compiles on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with gcc
3.4.3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #61 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-09-09 18:17:09 UTC ---
> patch committed
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53306
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-11
18:16:59 UTC ---
This PR is fixed by the patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-09/msg00035.html for pr54225. Isn't it a
duplicate?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54225
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-11
18:19:29 UTC ---
This PR seems to be a duplicate of pr53306.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54127
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc*-*-*
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54460
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-16
17:47:56 UTC ---
For the record, revision 191361 also fixes the failure on
powerpc-apple-darwin9. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54594
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-16
18:26:28 UTC ---
With the patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-09/msg00051.html, the
tests in comments #0 and #1 fails with
pr54594_1.f90:6.32:
generic :: assignment(=) => a_ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54613
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54617
Bug #: 54617
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE when compiling
gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42025-2.c on
powerpc-apple-darwin9 with -m64 and -O1 or above after
revision 19130
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54624
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-20
21:46:10 UTC ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01441.html for the typical
failures of libgomp.fortran.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54650
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54655
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54656
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54668
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47616
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xarthisius.kk at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47616
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45440
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-22
12:37:41 UTC ---
*** Bug 47616 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47616
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54668
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-22
12:40:00 UTC ---
As a duplicate of pr45440, a work around is (see pr45440#c4):
allocate(b(3), source=a)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-22
21:48:01 UTC ---
>
> interface.c: gfc_compare_derived_types BUG
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45440
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-22
21:57:52 UTC ---
If I apply the following patch
--- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/resolve.c2012-09-17 15:50:08.0 +0200
+++ gcc/fortran/resolve.c2012-09-22 18:02:47.0 +02
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52162
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54677
Bug #: 54677
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/decltype32.C (test
for excess errors) with -m64 after revision 191564
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-09-23 10:32:11 UTC ---
> The new gcc.dg/torture/pr53922.c testcase fails on darwin. ...
This is pr54083.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54677
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-23
10:49:53 UTC ---
> I tweaked the dg-error lines and didn't see any problem when I run the
> testsuite, weird. Let me double check. Not sure from your PR which are exactly
> the excess err
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54676
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54677
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-23
13:38:51 UTC ---
> Maybe you can give it a try now, but seems a good idea anyway.
I have tested without failure
check-g++ RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=decltype32.C --target_board=unix'{-m32,-m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at bromo dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-23
21:37:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 28255
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28255
alternative patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52945
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin10 |*-apple-darwin*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54650
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-23
21:56:33 UTC ---
This PR is fixed on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 by the
patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01573.html . Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54690
Bug #: 54690
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL:
gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_(7|13).f03 *
(internal compiler error) after revision 191649
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54690
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-24
14:04:38 UTC ---
The patch in comment #1 fixes this PR. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-26
15:41:05 UTC ---
The slowdown is mostly hidden by -fno-tree-loop-if-convert.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54730
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-27
21:33:32 UTC ---
The patch in comment #5 should fix it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54730
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-27
21:43:23 UTC ---
The ICE occurs at
tree
gfc_typenode_for_spec (gfc_typespec * spec)
{
tree basetype;
switch (spec->type)
{
case BT_UNKNOWN:
gcc_unreachable ();
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54730
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in |[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-30
12:36:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 28302
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28302
include/c++/4.8.0/cmath for darwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-30
15:33:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> > include/c++/4.8.0/cmath for darwin
>
> Dominique, it would be more useful if you could show your libstdc++
> config.log,
> and in particul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-09-30 15:37:29 UTC ---
> Note that the last time I checked, on Leopard, darwin actually enabled
> _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_MATH_TR1.
Well I may have been too quick to say *-*-darwin*, I am sure of p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54767
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-02
20:23:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 28333
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28333
bzipped tar archive of a reduced test
The tar archive contains the files
cptrf2_inl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-04
13:43:48 UTC ---
It works for me on powerpc-apple-darwin8, powerpc-apple-darwin9 and
x86_64-apple-darwin10 (builds from fink). What is your *-apple-darwin*? and
what is your command line?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|*-apple-darwin* |x86_64-apple-darwin12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-05
10:20:49 UTC ---
AFAICT the problem occurs in 64 bit mode, but not in 32 one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54832
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54836
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-06
16:01:14 UTC ---
It looks like a duplicate of pr45277, i.e., at least one of your GMP, MPFR, or
MPC libraries has a problem (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45277#c1 ).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54851
Bug #: 54851
Summary: Compiling gfortran.dg/class_array_7.f03 with '-O1
-flto' gives an ICE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54852
Bug #: 54852
Summary: Bogus(?) warnings when compiling
gfortran.dg/bind_c_vars.f90
gfortran.dg/bind_c_vars_driver.c with -flto
Classification: Unclassified
Prod
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54851
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sparc*-*-solaris2* |sparc*-*-solaris2*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54874
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-09
10:48:30 UTC ---
> And it is also a regression, as it works on 4.6.3: ...
Well, this may be more complicated. On x86_64-apple-darwin10, compiling the
attached test with 4.6.3 gives:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-09
11:35:19 UTC ---
> ... I don't have access to any big endian machines
> and therefore didn't even try to make it work.
AFAICT there are big endian machines in the CompileFarm (see
http
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-09
11:39:17 UTC ---
As Nathan Froyd said at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg00772.html
"Please try to consider what's best for all the people who use GCC, not just
the cases
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54884
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-10
07:36:10 UTC ---
Duplicate of pr54221 (see comment #5)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54881
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-10
07:38:39 UTC ---
I get the ICE with 4.7.2, but the trunk gives
pr54881.f90:140.24:
call DestroyNode (theNode, lstatus )
1
Error: Actual argument for 't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54886
Bug #: 54886
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.dg/graphite/pr(42521|42771).c (internal compiler
error) due to revision 192219
Classification: Unclassified
Pro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54884
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-10
13:24:42 UTC ---
> Well, I guess the point is that Dominique claimed that the bug reported by
> Andrew is a regression of your commit for PR54221:
The link errors disappear if I revert
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54901
Bug #: 54901
Summary: [4.8 Regression] air.f90, aermod.f90, and mdbx.f90 are
miscompiled with '-m64 -O3 -funroll-loops
-fwhole-program' after revision 192213
Classification
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54914
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54886
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54915
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54908
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin12 |*-apple-darwin*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54886
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-12
20:11:26 UTC ---
> Is r192219 the exact commit causing this regression?
r192218 is OK, r192219 is not. As usual, this does not rule out that r192219
only exposes a latent bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54917
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[OOP] TRANSFER on |[4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54917
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54917
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-13
10:12:28 UTC ---
> > It could be r177486 or 177486?
>
> Not sure. (Note: Both revisions you quote are the same.)
Oops! (never copy and paste after midnight.) r177486 or r177527 (see pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54923
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31696
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gnu.0kn at gishpuppy dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-14
17:08:09 UTC ---
> I don't know of any workaround so disabling the test seems like a good option
What about
--- libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc2012-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-14
19:06:32 UTC ---
> The patch in comment 4 with...
>
> make -k check
> RUNTESTFLAGS="conformance.exp=30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc
> --target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'"
>
> prod
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-14
20:48:21 UTC ---
> The dg-compile line oddly seems to suppress the running of the compiled test.
> ...
What happens if you replace the line
// { dg-do compile { target *-*-darwin[4-9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-10-14 21:17:47 UTC ---
> Still suppresses the execution of the test on x86_64-apple-darwin12. Are there
> any examples in the FSF gcc testsuites of dg-run being used at the same time
> as
> d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-10-14 21:34:55 UTC ---
> > I suspect that is an unsupported combination.
>
> Now you asked the question, the test is not run on powerpc-apple-darwin9
> with -m64.
> Could you try to put the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54901
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-16
09:51:21 UTC ---
> Dominique, could you attach the tests.
http://www.polyhedron.com/polyhedron_benchmark_suite0html
> Probably a dup of the discussion going on here:
> http://gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-10-16 17:57:52 UTC ---
Before the patch in comment #20, I get
-rwxr-xr-x 1 dominiq staff 73336 Oct 16 19:19 a.out*
[macbook] lin/test% time gfc -fprotect-parens -Ofast -funroll-loops
-ftree
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #22 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-10-16 20:58:58 UTC ---
With the patch I see a ~10% slowdown in the Test4 - Lapack 2 (1001x1001) of
test_fpu.f90 compared to revision 192449
[macbook] lin/test% time /opt/gcc/gcc4.8c/bin/gfor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54940
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-10-17 13:13:24 UTC ---
Summary for the polyhedron tests (pb05):
(a) revision 192449 unpatched
(b) revision 192516 with patch in comment #20
options: -fprotect-parens -Ofast -funroll-loops -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #25 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-10-17 14:05:51 UTC ---
> I also see many failures for the gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-* tests: slsr-2.c to
> slsr-11.c, slsr-14.c to slsr-20.c, slsr-24.c, and slsr-25.c, and for
> gfortran.dg/vect/ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54961
Bug #: 54961
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr48757.f -O
(internal compiler error) after revision 192440
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
401 - 500 of 7788 matches
Mail list logo
