http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54917
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-10-13 10:12:28 UTC --- > > It could be r177486 or 177486? > > Not sure. (Note: Both revisions you quote are the same.) Oops! (never copy and paste after midnight.) r177486 or r177527 (see pr50004). Note the "could"; I am not sure either, but it looks the most likely in the set of patches for the time period. If my guess is right, the patchlet in comment #1 makes sense.
