[Bug libfortran/59513] Fortran runtime error: Sequential READ or WRITE not allowed after EOF marker, possibly use REWIND or BACKSPACE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59513 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/59547] Problem with using tbp specification function in multiple class procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59547 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/59513] Fortran runtime error: Sequential READ or WRITE not allowed after EOF marker, possibly use REWIND or BACKSPACE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59513 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I also see the problem with gfortran 4.7.3.

[Bug libfortran/59513] [4.7/4.8/4.9] Fortran runtime error: Sequential READ or WRITE not allowed after EOF marker, possibly use REWIND or BACKSPACE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59513 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Fortran runtime error: |[4.7/4.8/4.9] Fortran

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I have reverted the changes in gcc/config/darwin.c done by r 206070 and bootstrap went fine. The new failing tests are still there.

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The new failing tests are still there. I was wrong: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1.c passes.

[Bug target/52794] gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr52027.c fails on x86_64/i386-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52794 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- This seems to be fixed by a change between r206040 and r206072. Due to pr59541 you need to revert r206070 for the file gcc/config/darwin.c.

[Bug target/52794] gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr52027.c fails on x86_64/i386-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52794 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I confirm that this PR is fixed by r206070, see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-12/msg01811.html and http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-12/msg01813.html.

[Bug fortran/46991] [OOP] polymorphic assumed-size actual arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46991 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #32 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > > Would it be possible to post the fix? TIA. > > Committed upstream as > > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=196779&view=rev > > Feel free to commit the exact same change to gcc > > or wait

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Feel free to commit the exact fix as in ... Sorry, no write access.

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #36 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Give me 1-2 hours. > Just in case, please verify that the patch still works on Mac 10.6 > (I don't have access to 10.6) Already done: see comment 27. Anyway, I guarantee a quick feedback!-)

[Bug fortran/59104] Wrong result with SIZE specification expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/38183] Useless move to memory when passing small structs to functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38183 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/47016] bootstrap on darwin needs much more disk space than expected to complete

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47016 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Any reason to keep this PR open?

[Bug boehm-gc/18135] gctest (boehm-gc) uses the installed libgcc_s on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18135 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Posted more than three years ago: > Andrew, > Do you still see this issue with current gcc trunk since... Any reason to keep this PR open?

[Bug other/30138] PPC64 Darwin needs -search_paths_first to use newly-created libz.a instead of system libz.a

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30138 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/27221] g++.dg/ext/alignof2.C fails on powerpc-darwin (and powerpc-aix)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27221 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug bootstrap/45248] Stage 3 bootstrap comparison failure (powerpc-darwin8)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45248 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/46591] Can't build m68k-elf target on i386-apple-darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46591 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug boehm-gc/47309] gcc-4.4.5 fails to build on darwin/ppc due to issues in boehm-gc GC_test_and_set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47309 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/48747] Darwin/MacOSX 10.5 fixincludes make check => complex.h missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48747 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/48402] autogen fixincludes in GCC 4.6.0 testsuite fails on OS X 10.6.7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48402 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/59560] Resolution generic procedure of derived types fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/22317] c99_classification_macros_c.cc fails on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22317 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/59560] Resolution generic procedure of derived types fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- When I say 4.7.3 it means the 4.7.3 release, otherwise I give the revision number or the date if the former is not available.

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The failure of FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1.c is due to the first part of http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/gcc/config/darwin.c?r1=206070&r2=206069&pathrev=206070&sortby=date&view=p

[Bug bootstrap/47016] bootstrap on darwin needs much more disk space than expected to complete

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47016 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #38 from Dominique d'Humieres --- (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #37) > Done, r206113. Thanks, I successfully bootstrapped r206120 (with a fix for pr59541) on x86_64-apple-darwin10. > Is there anything else left in this

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jh at suse dot cz,

[Bug middle-end/58746] [4.9 Regression] Incorrect warning with -Waggressive-loop-optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58746 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|2013-11-27

[Bug middle-end/57904] [4.9 Regression] Bogus(?) "invokes undefined behavior" warning with Fortran's finalization wrapper (gfortran.dg/class_48.f90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57904 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- With the patch in comment 9, gfortran.dg/class_48.f90 no longer fails and I don't see any regression. The warning for the test in pr58746 comment 2 is also fixed.

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Note that on x86_64-apple-darwin10 the test gcc.dg/tree-prof/cold_partition_label.c has started to fail (compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE) between r204856 (OK) and r205324 (fail). This is fixe

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > could someone please point me at the original post for this patch? > > I have the same question. I have finally found the answer: final patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg01368.

[Bug testsuite/59494] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-mgrid-resid.f scan-tree-dump-times optimized "vect_[^\\n]*\\+ " 13

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59494 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I believe that is the only reason for the different number of vector > additions. I don't think the number of packed double operations is changed, only the number of occurrences of the scanned regul

[Bug middle-end/57904] [4.9 Regression] Bogus(?) "invokes undefined behavior" warning with Fortran's finalization wrapper (gfortran.dg/class_48.f90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57904 --- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 58746 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/58746] [4.9 Regression] Incorrect warning with -Waggressive-loop-optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58746 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/57904] [4.9 Regression] Bogus(?) "invokes undefined behavior" warning with Fortran's finalization wrapper (gfortran.dg/class_48.f90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57904 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > For the FE change, I guess most important are benchmark results, > doesn't it slow down important benchmarks? AFAICT the answer is not at least for the gfortran test suite and the polyhedron ones (

[Bug fortran/59561] [4.9 Regression] warning: iteration 4 invokes undefined behavior

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59561 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/59561] [4.9 Regression] warning: iteration 4 invokes undefined behavior

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59561 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Hello, > thank you for the hotfix that repaired switch/case missing return value. Nothing has been committed yet to fix darwin bootstrap!-(

[Bug libfortran/59419] [4.9 Regression] Failing OPEN with FILE='xxx' and IOSTAT creates the file 'xxx' after revision 196783

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59419 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The modified test gfortran.dg/open_negative_unit_1.f90 in the patch submitted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-12/msg00124.html checks that this PR is fixed.

[Bug fortran/58787] ICE (error recovery) in check_proc_interface

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58787 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/58787] ICE (error recovery) in check_proc_interface

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58787 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Backtrace (patched tree): Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. gfc_resolve_expr (e=0x141e1f7a0) at ../../work/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:2827 2827 if (sym && sym->attr.intrinsic (gdb) b

[Bug fortran/58861] Realloc on assignment: Bogus "Array bound mismatch" error with -fcheck=bounds

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58861 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/58200] Option fcheck is misleadingly located in option descriptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58200 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/58171] [F03] Incorrect error message on invalid code when using type constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58171 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/44482] some warnings in libgcc amd64-darwin 4.5.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44482 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/59369] c-c++-common/asan/pr59063-[1,2].c fails on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59369 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/38183] Useless move to memory when passing small structs to functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38183 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/59016] f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59016 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- With the test in comment 1, I get on x86_64-apple-darwin13: TYPE(atomic_kind_type), pointer :: atomic_kind 1 Error: Derived type 'atomic_kind_type' at (1) is being used be

[Bug fortran/59016] f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59016 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Backtrace is Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. error_print(const char *, const char *, typedef __va_list_tag __va_list_tag *) (type=, format0=, argp=) at ../../work/gcc/fortran/e

[Bug fortran/59069] Bogus error wording for passing array to scalar dummies with user-defined operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59069 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/56981] Slow I/O: Unformatted 5x slower, large sys component; formatted slow as well

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56981 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/58842] libgfortran configuration error in 32-bit mode for GCC 4.8 with MacPorts "universal installation"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58842 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/43849] Add _gfortran_finalize function to close down the library

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43849 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/50342] gcc/configure fails on Mac OS X Lion/Xcode 4.1 with recent GCCs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50342 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/47608] libstdc++ links to bad libgcc_s on OS X (libgcc_s rebuilt needlessly and incorrectly)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47608 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/52795] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE on {x86_64,i386}-apple-darwin{10,11} at -m64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52795 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Target|{x86_64,i386}-apple-darwin{ |{x86_64,i386}-apple-darwin1

[Bug target/59576] New: "sorry, unimplemented: making multiple clones" error on *-apple-darwin*

ty: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr CC: howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu, iains at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Hos

[Bug fortran/59345] _gfortran_internal_pack on compiler generated temps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/59577] OpenMP: ICE with type(c_ptr) in private()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59577 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/59586] Segmentation fault with -Ofast -floop-parallelize-all -ftree-parallelize-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59586 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/59586] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [graphite] Segmentation fault with -Ofast -floop-parallelize-all -ftree-parallelize-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59586 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/59589] Memory leak when deallocating polymorphic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59589 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/59589] Memory leak when deallocating polymorphic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59589 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- On x86_64-apple-darwin10.8, gcc version 4.8.2, with the call system line commented, valgrind gives: ==42524== HEAP SUMMARY: ==42524== in use at exit: 88 bytes in 1 blocks ==42524== total heap us

[Bug fortran/59589] Memory leak when deallocating polymorphic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59589 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The test also succeeds on x86_64-apple-darwin13 (clean r206033 or heavily patched r206191) when compiled with -fsanitize=leak.

[Bug tree-optimization/59591] [4.9 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_stmt_copy, at tree-vect-stmts.c:156 for -march=core-avx2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59591 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/59589] Memory leak when deallocating polymorphic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59589 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #7 from Dominique

[Bug fortran/59589] [4.9 Regression] Memory leak when deallocating polymorphic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59589 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Memory leak when|[4.9 Regression] Memory

[Bug fortran/59589] [4.9 Regression] Memory leak when deallocating polymorphic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59589 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Further support from valgrind on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu: I was not questioning the PR, but the regression: if I don't see the leak at 4.9 on my builds, there is a suspicion that the bug may have been l

[Bug tree-optimization/59597] [4.9 Regression] Performance degradation on Coremark after r205074

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59597 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/59599] Compiler internal error on intrinsic ichar

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59599 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/59576] "sorry, unimplemented: making multiple clones" error on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59576 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug c++/41090] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Using static label reference in c++ class constructor produces wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41090 --- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The test g++.dg/ext/label13.C XPASS after r20182 on darwin.

[Bug fortran/56674] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in check_sym_interfaces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56674 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- This appeared at r181425.

[Bug fortran/59023] [4.9 regression] ICE in gfc_search_interface with BIND(C)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59023 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bur...@net-b.de --- Comment #3 fro

[Bug fortran/56169] Installation the Chromium from ports fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56169 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/46485] gfortran.dg/allocatable_scalar_5.f90 fails on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46485 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/53035] ICE with deferred-length module variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53035 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/50552] type name cannot be statement function dummy argument (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50552 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/53379] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] No backtrace generated for array bounds violation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/58998] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Generic interface problem with gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/59604] Constant comparisons with -fno-range-check and int(z'...')

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59604 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|2013-12-28

[Bug fortran/45426] Fixed-form: END may not be continued

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45426 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49111] Unnecessary warning for private interfaces having the BIND(C) attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49111 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Priority|P3

[Bug preprocessor/44526] libcpp should avoid circular dependencies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44526 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/47720] problems with makefile dependency generation using -M

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47720 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/47485] gfortran -M output is incorrect when -MT option is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47485 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52622] ICE in gfortran 4.6.3, x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52622 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug target/59663] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap failure: config/darwin.c:3665:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59663 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 --- Comment #26 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Why doesn't anyone report this issue? It's now tracked as PR59663 It has been pr59541 since 2013-12-18 07:46 UTC.

[Bug fortran/58586] [OOP] ICE with derived type with a polymorphic allocatable component passed by value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58586 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/58557] [OOP] Issues with CLASS/TYPE functions in array constructors: reject valid, memory leaks, invalid free

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58557 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/56660] Fails to read NAMELIST with certain form array syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56660 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/54223] Statement function statement with dummy arguments that are also OPTIONAL may crash in wrong calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54223 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code St

[Bug middle-end/53714] false positive for -Wuninitialized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53714 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCO

[Bug fortran/59678] Segmentation fault on equalizing variables of a complex derived data type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59678 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

<    11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   >