http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #28 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-02-14
06:11:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > You are right, your suggestions is what I sketched in comment #21 as
> > choices 1
> > or 2. Sorry for my uncl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29146|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-02-18
11:08:10 UTC ---
I will test the patch removing the JUMP_P part of the conditional on x86-64 and
ia64, but for 4.8 I'd suggest trying some more platforms, like ppc at the
minimum.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #32 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-02-19
13:50:59 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Feb 19 13:50:50 2013
New Revision: 196137
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196137
Log:
2012-02-19 Andrey Belevantsev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-02-25
08:48:48 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Mon Feb 25 08:48:42 2013
New Revision: 196252
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196252
Log:
2013-02-25 Andrey Belevantsev
work||4.8.0
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6/4.7 Regression]
|volatile ignored when |volatile ignored
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--- Comment #26 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-02-26
09:21:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 29539
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29539
scheduler patch
I'm testing the attached patch to fix the ICE in the scheduler. Then
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--- Comment #27 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-02-27
08:56:15 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed Feb 27 08:56:08 2013
New Revision: 196308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196308
Log:
PR middle-end/45472
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
Summary|[4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--- Comment #29 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-04-03
05:59:53 UTC ---
Ported to 4.7 and 4.6, though no bugzilla commit made. Do I close the bug or
do we want to fix the front-end to produce the proper volatile bits?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #11 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-04-03
15:51:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> So are we going to backport this one?
Sorry, I've missed this one when backporting other stuff. I can do this
tomorrow, the patch is safe. H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56848
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56848
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
--- Comment #16 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-04-11
06:17:41 UTC ---
The patch adds more pending list flushes and thus more dependencies. So by
itself it is conservative and should not result in correctness issues that
arise when the sched
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56912
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-04-17
05:14:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Breakpoint 5, sel_remove_insn (insn=0x3fffb5da4e78, only_disconnect=false,
> full_tidying=false) at ../../trunk/gcc/sel-sched-ir.c:3938
> 3938
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-04-17
06:52:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 29886
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29886
proposed patch
Easy enough,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-04-18
09:18:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Created attachment 29886 [details]
> > proposed patch
>
> You should probably make this a static inline function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-04-22
09:48:37 UTC ---
I see some more ICEs of the same type while testing on ia64, so the patch might
not be enough in general, though it fixes the original test. I will need to
spend more time
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29886|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57105
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-04-29
09:18:26 UTC ---
Does the patch from http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957#c9 fixes
your issue?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57105
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-04-29
09:40:11 UTC ---
Fine, I've tested it on ia64 and got an offline approval from Alexander, I'd
need to test on x86-64 and commit then.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57105
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-08-09
14:08:38 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Aug 9 14:08:31 2012
New Revision: 190253
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190253
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/53701
* sel-sched.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-09-03
08:21:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Created attachment 28121 [details]
> gcc48-pr54455.patch
>
> Patch for 2). asm goto with fallthru labels is pretty hard case, handled in
> cfgrtl.c h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-09-04
17:47:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> For some reason, -fselective-scheduling is moving
>
> (insn 19 16 22 2 (use (reg/i:SI 0 ax)) testcase.c:6 -1
> (nil))
>
> around. This insn marks
reconfirmed||2012-10-04
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-10-04
12:43:36 UTC ---
(In
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
--- Comment #20 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-10-16
13:20:37 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Oct 16 13:20:30 2012
New Revision: 192497
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192497
Log:
Backport from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-10-16
13:22:26 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Oct 16 13:22:22 2012
New Revision: 192498
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192498
Log:
2012-10-16 Andrey Belevantsev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-10-22
19:34:41 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Mon Oct 22 19:34:35 2012
New Revision: 192693
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192693
Log:
Backport from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-10-26
14:04:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Have you managed to check the patch?
The patch does the right thing for sets and clobbers, but the uses case should
be amended, too, judging f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
--- Comment #21 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-10-28
18:17:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> This issue still exists in mainline, there seems to be no objection to
> Andrey's
> suggested fix, could someone please commit it?
Not quit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48374
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-10-30
08:25:24 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Oct 30 08:25:16 2012
New Revision: 192979
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192979
Log:
Backport from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48374
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-11-09
12:28:30 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Fri Nov 9 12:28:21 2012
New Revision: 193358
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193358
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/54472
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-11-09
12:33:33 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk, backports to 4.7/4.6 are needed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #22 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-12-21
12:10:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 22834
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22834
Another patch
This patch should fix the last attachment from this bug and also the tests from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46521
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-12-21
12:13:08 UTC ---
The patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352#c22 works for
this test, too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46522
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Andrey
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46522
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-12-22
07:46:57 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed Dec 22 07:46:53 2010
New Revision: 168164
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168164
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/45352
PR rtl-optimi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #23 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-12-22
07:46:57 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed Dec 22 07:46:53 2010
New Revision: 168164
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168164
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/45352
PR rtl-optim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46521
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-12-22
07:46:57 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed Dec 22 07:46:53 2010
New Revision: 168164
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168164
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/45352
PR rtl-optimi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #25 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-12-24
08:23:07 UTC ---
Zdenek, please don't worry about the set of flags, it does not make fixing the
problem any harder, and your work on finding these is invaluable for us.
Sigh, in this case I forg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #27 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-01-13
09:29:13 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Jan 13 09:29:09 2011
New Revision: 168742
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168742
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/45352
* se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46521
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46522
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46642
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--- Comment #14 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-01-13
10:04:18 UTC ---
Do we want at least the patch properly merging the volatile bits in the
scheduler for 4.6? Or is this better be s plain ICE instead of a silent
miscompile?
||2011.01.28 09:43:05
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-01-28
09:43:05 UTC ---
Confirmed. This is because we deliberately abort on SEQUENCEs here
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: abel at gcc dot gnu.org
The following code is accepted by g++ (versions 3.3, 4.6, 4.7 at least, I
didn't check trunk) but seems to be invalid c++ and is rejected by clang 3.2,
i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57599
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|g++ accepts invalid |g++ accepts invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57599
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
(In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #4)
> I created a test case for all type conversion operators:
Paolo has already submitted a patch with the expanded test case at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patche
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57599
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #6)
> Fixed for 4.9.0.
Do you plan to backport this to 4.7 and 4.8?
||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
I will take a look, but I will be on vacation in two days, so do not expect
much on this until September.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57662
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Created attachment 30650
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30650&action=edit
proposed patch
When moving up an instruction, we can make empty basic blocks or create other
possibilities f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
--- Comment #13 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-07-20
08:49:54 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Fri Jul 20 08:49:52 2012
New Revision: 189705
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189705
Log:
Backport from mainline
2012-03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
--- Comment #14 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-07-24
09:22:14 UTC ---
The problem is that we don't handle this type of speculation well in sel-sched.
While moving an insn through speculation check, it is hard to decide for us
whether it is safe, w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #17 from Andrey
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
--- Comment #18 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-07-31
10:56:59 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Jul 31 10:56:52 2012
New Revision: 190005
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190005
Log:
PR target/53975
* sel-sched-i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
--- Comment #19 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-07-31
11:11:22 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk. Judging by the time the original wrong patch went in, this
should be a regression and thus I'll commit this to 4.7 too after a week or so.
||2012-08-06
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work|4.8.0 |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-08-08
11:26:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 27959
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27959
proposed patch
The problem is that when checking expressions that are blocked for movement
beca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48374
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-02-06
08:32:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Seems you forgot to actually add the test case.
Thanks, I forgot to svn add, fixed in 183928.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-02-06
12:10:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Can this be applied to 4.5/4.6 please?
Well, the patch was approved for trunk only, but it is committed for two weeks
now and looks safe -- Jakub?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-02-09
10:10:41 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Feb 9 10:10:36 2012
New Revision: 184038
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184038
Log:
2012-02-09 Andrey Belevantsev
Backp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-02-09
10:17:59 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Feb 9 10:17:55 2012
New Revision: 184040
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184040
Log:
2012-02-09 Andrey Belevantsev
Back
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
|unassigned at gcc dot |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-02-11
12:52:38 UTC ---
Thanks, Zdenek and Steven, I'll look at this on Monday. I bet this is caused
by yet another insn without a reservation.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-02-13
08:48:35 UTC ---
Well, in this case the insn is vcvtps2pd (from avx_cvtps2pd256 and
*avx_cvtps2pd256_2 patterns) but not having a reservation looks correct as the
manual says "decode type -- micro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-02-14
06:56:10 UTC ---
Sorry, I didn't explain clearly from the start. Regarding the backend, I just
wanted to double check that for the given insn not having a reservation is
correct. Now that Uros c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-02-22
18:49:15 UTC ---
I'll take a look on Friday, tomorrow I am off work. Indeed I do not remember
seeing these notes at the assert time.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-02-27
13:03:58 UTC ---
When removing an empty block, we need to find its neighbour to stick the bb
note list to, and the code doing this now just picks some pred block from the
loop that redirects preds
|unassigned at gcc dot |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-03-06
07:31:49 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Mar 6 07:31:43 2012
New Revision: 184975
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184975
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/52250
* sel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
Target Milestone|4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-03-07
12:00:42 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed Mar 7 12:00:37 2012
New Revision: 185036
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185036
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/52203
* sel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Be
||2012-03-26
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-03-26
12:26:53 UTC ---
Sigh. Of course
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
--- Comment #15 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-03-27
13:06:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > It's failing not only on sh, but on x86-64 too, started with (no surprise
> > here)
> > r185564: ...
>
> Is it related
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
--- Comment #16 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-03-27
13:28:03 UTC ---
So, something like the below patch, or even better -- as we want to fold all
RTL-build related pseudo passes into expand, make pass_instantiate_virtual_regs
also the expand part
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
--- Comment #18 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-03-27
14:08:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Looks reasonable. Though I think that whoever removed the fallthru
> edge should have adjusted the flags on the others.
That's simply delete_basic_bl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
--- Comment #11 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-04-13
09:36:46 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Fri Apr 13 09:36:42 2012
New Revision: 186410
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186410
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/52203
PR r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52715
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-04-13
09:36:47 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Fri Apr 13 09:36:42 2012
New Revision: 186410
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186410
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/52203
PR rt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52715
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57662
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Fixed according to
>
> 2013-08-14 Andrey Belevantsev
>
> PR rtl-optimization/57662
> * sel-sched.c (code_motion_process_successors): Whe
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |abel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Created attachment 31465
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31465&action=edit
proposed patch
This is an issue with somewhat surprising reason. The problem in itself is
that whe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57422
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Author: abel
Date: Mon Dec 23 06:41:22 2013
New Revision: 206173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206173&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/57422
* sel-sched.c (mark_unavailabl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57422
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
Author: abel
Date: Mon Dec 23 06:43:49 2013
New Revision: 206174
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206174&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/57422
* sel-sched.c (fill_vec_av_set
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57422
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 323 matches
Mail list logo