https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116918
--- Comment #6 from Gaius Mulley ---
Many thanks for spotting this - will fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116973
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Note the load in question isn't lowered because of
/* When the load permutation accesses a contiguous unpermuted,
power-of-two aligned and sized chunk leave the load alone.
We can l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116969
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We could just drop the format attribute from the decl and then we don't need to
suppress a warning. The attribute isn't useful here, since we know the format
string is correct for the arguments we're using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116955
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024, tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116955
>
> Thomas Schwinge changed:
>
>What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116972
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |target
Summary|missed vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116921
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92e9e971ced90af5a825ae4b35ad6c98c9ab86da
commit r15-4063-g92e9e971ced90af5a825ae4b35ad6c98c9ab86da
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116972
--- Comment #2 from Yi <652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This is not exactly a missed optimization. Rather the default settings for
> the generic x86_64 is to use rep stosq for the memset of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28614
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024, tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28614
>
> --- Comment #8 from Thomas Schwinge ---
> (In reply to myself from comment #7)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116921
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] ICE: in |[14 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403
Bug 87403 depends on bug 96842, which changed state.
Bug 96842 Summary: enhancement: copy clang Wheader-guard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96842
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96842
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116969
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't think so. Libstdc++ is using dirty tricks to have two different kinds
of `long double` visible in the same TU, and passing each of them to the
appropriate snprintf function.
The snprintf function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116969
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
tl;dr the attributes are correct, but libstdc++ is cheating. Suppressing the
warnings because we want to chat seems appropriate.
However, I might need to suppress some more, for the inverse case where
_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108540
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a0cc6941d8c8fa88441fdae1ffb35396a412ec6b
commit r15-4054-ga0cc6941d8c8fa88441fdae1ffb35396a412ec6b
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116934
--- Comment #3 from Saurabh Jha ---
Submitted a patch for review.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-October/664477.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116430
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7363d73e26351f42406f7ae31e985768e9a1109a
commit r14-10744-g7363d73e26351f42406f7ae31e985768e9a1109a
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116430
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116971
Bug ID: 116971
Summary: Some missed vec_perm_const
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116979
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116979
vincenzo Innocente changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116961
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116933
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
> -ftrivial-auto-var-init was initially added for C/C++. It was not fully
> tested for other FEs.
> I guess that there should be issues for other FEs in addition to ada.
>
> So, shall we disable this feat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116743
--- Comment #11 from Rama Malladi ---
Hi Eugene, Could you please review the test-case attached? Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112358
--- Comment #10 from John David Anglin ---
The following patch also fixes the warning/error.
diff --git a/elf/dl-find_object.c b/elf/dl-find_object.c
index 449302eda3..b18a1b209d 100644
--- a/elf/dl-find_object.c
+++ b/elf/dl-find_object.c
@@ -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59858
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thiago Bauermann :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:115857bf1e32637e258a9329fdf25cf924d01e90
commit r15-4075-g115857bf1e32637e258a9329fdf25cf924d01e90
Author: Thiago Jung Bauermann
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65647
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thiago Bauermann :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:115857bf1e32637e258a9329fdf25cf924d01e90
commit r15-4075-g115857bf1e32637e258a9329fdf25cf924d01e90
Author: Thiago Jung Bauermann
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97969
--- Comment #29 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thiago Bauermann :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:115857bf1e32637e258a9329fdf25cf924d01e90
commit r15-4075-g115857bf1e32637e258a9329fdf25cf924d01e90
Author: Thiago Jung Bauermann
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65710
--- Comment #34 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thiago Bauermann :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:115857bf1e32637e258a9329fdf25cf924d01e90
commit r15-4075-g115857bf1e32637e258a9329fdf25cf924d01e90
Author: Thiago Jung Bauermann
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116977
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #1)
> David, re (a) and (c), do we teach directly the Analyzer about specific
> functions (like 'acc_malloc', 'acc_free' if '-fopenacc' is enabled), or do
> we add G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116977
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks for looking at this, and for filing the bug.
There are two ways of tracking state in the analyzer:
(a) using state machines, like in sm-malloc.cc, which let program_state
instances track per-svalue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116978
Bug ID: 116978
Summary: ICE with -fdiagnostics-format=sarif-file when
main_input_filename is null
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116970
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116978
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116444
--- Comment #5 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Posted a fix, I believe it's related to the fact that for the cases where we
were using noce before, it was using the default hook to do a cost check, my
patch blankly approved those, this fix ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116969
Bug ID: 116969
Summary: '__ibm128' '-Wformat' diagnostics in
'libstdc++-v3/include/bits/locale_facets_nonio.tcc'
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116968
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
IIRC we do (did?) have some predicates using void * that accepted both tree and
RTL. I think overloads would be OK though insn_unremovable_* might be a better
match for RTL.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116969
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> I don't think so. Libstdc++ is using dirty tricks [...]
In that case, let me suggest adding a source code comment, to make it clear
that the '#pragma GCC di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116210
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Hmm, 17_intro/names.cc is supposed to test libstdc++ not libc headers. But
running it again with _FORTIFY_SOURCE defined is really only going to find
problems in Glibc, and that test belongs in Glibc itse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116977
Bug ID: 116977
Summary: Analyzer: track OpenACC "host" vs. "device" pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116977
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116933
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116430
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Summary|Crash "Assert_Fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116430
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
Version|14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116430
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116911
Bug 116911 depends on bug 113266, which changed state.
Bug 113266 Summary: [C++11/14 only] local linkage variable rejected as a
template argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113266
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116911
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113266
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 113266, which changed state.
Bug 113266 Summary: [C++11/14 only] local linkage variable rejected as a
template argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113266
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116913
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 116911, which changed state.
Bug 116911 Summary: [15 regression] reference to a variable in anonymous
namespace no longer considered constexpr in C++11 since r15-3910-gaf4471cb422a86
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116925
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:67b750c20e1f9428ef89a6fed0103e912bea8679
commit r15-4062-g67b750c20e1f9428ef89a6fed0103e912bea8679
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26827
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31687
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71072
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116210
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99856
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a96ebb2cd4de205c6d4ac6691117e4e96f8533e9
commit r15-4057-ga96ebb2cd4de205c6d4ac6691117e4e96f8533e9
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116964
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f135278f559914c0336cd8ad0af0deac2a0c86fd
commit r15-4058-gf135278f559914c0336cd8ad0af0deac2a0c86fd
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116964
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116444
--- Comment #4 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
No hadn't seen that yet. Will look at it thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116976
Bug ID: 116976
Summary: vector::iterator fails to meet
Cpp17InputIterator requirements
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116955
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116954
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] |[13/14/15 Regression]
|fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116972
Bug ID: 116972
Summary: missed vectorization when an array of type 'long' is
initialized to 0
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116444
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7766a2c1eb683352ce117e8ed014665f392f
commit r15-4066-g7766a2c1eb683352ce117e8ed014665f392f
Author: Andre Vieira
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116444
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116444
--- Comment #3 from Torbjorn SVENSSON ---
@Andre, did you see the email I sent you yesterday about the regression that
this change introduced?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116933
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116918
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e2a701cd0419a1898a2a359711572a8bcf4f8eb3
commit r15-4072-ge2a701cd0419a1898a2a359711572a8bcf4f8eb3
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114964
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Any news about this? Did you try with GCC 14.1 or GCC 14.2? If you still get
the bugbox, then proceed as explained in the detailed instructions written at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#gnat in particular:
"If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115376
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Any news about this? Did you try with GCC 14.1 or GCC 14.2? If you still get
the bugbox, then proceed as explained in the detailed instructions written at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#gnat in particular:
"If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116979
Bug ID: 116979
Summary: [12 regression] fma not always used in complex product
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116933
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
Another installment in the series "How come this worked before?":
diff --git a/gcc/tree.cc b/gcc/tree.cc
index bc50afca9a3..095c02c5474 100644
--- a/gcc/tree.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree.cc
@@ -9848,7 +9848,6 @@ build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116953
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58b9024c996951f8d768f1c83a74e5f3eef8a1c7
commit r15-4078-g58b9024c996951f8d768f1c83a74e5f3eef8a1c7
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108585
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||652023330028 at smail dot
nju.edu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116972
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116981
Bug ID: 116981
Summary: wrongly accepted non-more-specialized partial
specialization of class template member for an
instantiated enclosing template
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116943
mauro russo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116981
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116981
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32071
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ing.russomauro at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116981
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #3 from And
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116981
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116933
--- Comment #11 from Qing Zhao ---
> On Oct 4, 2024, at 14:03, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
> wrote:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116933
>
> --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Another installment in the series "How
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116984
Bug ID: 116984
Summary: -fsanitize=bounds triggers within
__builtin_dynamic_object_size()
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116984
--- Comment #4 from Kees Cook ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I don't think so since &p->array[negative] is undefined behavior even inside
> a dynamic boz.
Without counted_by, that is true. With counted_by all out of bounds
ca
Hi there,
We are excited to offer you a comprehensive email list of school districts that
includes key contact information such as phone numbers, email addresses,
mailing addresses, company revenue, size, and web addresses. Our databases also
cover related industries such as:
* K-12 schools
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116953
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116933
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
Note that:
location_t loc = EXPR_LOCATION (decl);
is equivalent to:
location_t loc = UNKNOWN_LOCATION;
I presume that DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION was meant instead here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116962
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d2845da112214f064e7b24531cc67e256b5177e
commit r15-4080-g7d2845da112214f064e7b24531cc67e256b5177e
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Oct 4 16:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116933
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ---
But that's not sufficient and passing LOC to build_string_literal does not
change anything either since gimplify_arg has this:
/* FIXME diagnostics: This will mess up gcc.dg/Warray-bounds.c. */
/* Make
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116933
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 59283
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59283&action=edit
Tentative fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116979
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
vect___r$_M_value$real_8.21_4 = MEM [(float *)a_2(D)];
vect___r$_M_value$real_8.22_24 = VEC_PERM_EXPR
;
vect___r$_M_value$real_8.30_35 = VEC_PERM_EXPR
;
vect__10.25_28 = MEM [(float *)b_3(D)];
ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116979
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 regression] fma not |[12/13/14/15 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116962
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114964
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I have read the detailed instructions for submitting bug reports and
> they are not realistic for a project as large as mine. It is, perhaps,
> the largest open source Ada project. I don't think you wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116958
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 59284
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59284&action=edit
Implement vector(from_range_t, R&&) etc.
Untested patch adding the P1206R7 changes to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116983
Bug ID: 116983
Summary: counted_by not used to identify singleton pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116934
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Saurabh Jha :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20ce363c557d6458ec3193ab4e7df760fbe34976
commit r15-4079-g20ce363c557d6458ec3193ab4e7df760fbe34976
Author: Saurabh Jha
Date: Thu O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116953
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93a6fab364343218e58fd7618e87e5202ae18542
commit r14-10745-g93a6fab364343218e58fd7618e87e5202ae18542
Author: Georg-Johan
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
