https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116933

--- Comment #11 from Qing Zhao <qing.zhao at oracle dot com> ---
> On Oct 4, 2024, at 14:03, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 
> <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116933
> 
> --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Another installment in the series "How come this worked before?":

We added one more argument for __builtin_clear_padding to distinguish whether
this call is for AUTO_INIT or not. 
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/tree.cc b/gcc/tree.cc
> index bc50afca9a3..095c02c5474 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree.cc
> @@ -9848,7 +9848,6 @@ build_common_builtin_nodes (void)
>       ftype = build_function_type_list (void_type_node,
>                                        ptr_type_node,
>                                        ptr_type_node,
> -                                       integer_type_node,

This integer_type_node is for the new argument.

Reply via email to