[Bug target/113255] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -mtune=k8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113255 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/113265] [Regression] Missed optimization for redundancy computation elimination may be due to constant propagation about 0 too late

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113265 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/113265] [Regression] Missed optimization for redundancy computation elimination may be due to constant propagation about 0 too late

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113265 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/113268] (i + (i + 1) * CST) AND (i + i * CST + 1 * CST) not folded the same way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113268 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[Bug rtl-optimization/113280] Strange error for empty inline assembly with +X constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113280 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org Ke

[Bug tree-optimization/113281] [14 Regression] Wrong code due to vectorization of shift reduction and missing promotions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection CC|

[Bug sanitizer/113284] [14 regression] many failures in asan after r14-6946-ge66dc37b299cac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113284 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug target/112992] Inefficient vector initialization using vec_duplicate/broadcast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112992 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6a67fdcb3f0cc8be47b49ddd246d0c50c3770800 commit r14-7026-g6a67fdcb3f0cc8be47b49ddd246d0c50c3770800 Author: Roger Sayle Date: Tue J

[Bug tree-optimization/113210] [14 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have cond_expr in get_len, at tree.h:6481

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113210 --- Comment #16 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > Created attachment 57007 [details] > gcc14-pr113210.patch > > So like this instead? yes

[Bug rtl-optimization/113280] Strange error for empty inline assembly with +X constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113280 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Nothing has changed here. opt == 2 and opt == 3 should use "=X", not "+X", btw. combine is perfectly correct that "X" allows *any operand whatsoever*, also those that you cannot really use as an outpu

[Bug tree-optimization/113265] [Regression] Missed optimization for redundancy computation elimination may be due to constant propagation about 0 too late

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113265 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Thinking on how to solve this would be have a match which says maybe_negative_expr which matches - and minus expressions and then have an external function which checks if -@0 matches @1 . Though that would

[Bug target/113288] [i386] Missing #define for -mavx10.1-256 and -mavx10.1-512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113288 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus --- The(In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #3) > Adding them are quite straightforward. I guess so. Note: this PR is about the #define in gcc/config/i386, only. > But I am not quite sure how the whole > li

[Bug rtl-optimization/113280] Strange error for empty inline assembly with +X constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113280 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- Oh, and if the goal of the code is to put and keep the datum in a register, the code should really use "+r" anyway!

[Bug rtl-optimization/113140] [13/14 regression] segmentation fault during delay slot scheduling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113140 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |rtl-optimization --- Comment #9 from Er

[Bug libgomp/113192] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ERROR: couldn't execute "../../../gcc/libgomp/testsuite/flock": no such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113192 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2e967e0257bc8188840df236595e7218b6bf748 commit r14-7027-gf2e967e0257bc8188840df236595e7218b6bf748 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug target/113231] x86_64 uses SSE instructions for `*mem <<= const` at -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113231 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/113280] Strange error for empty inline assembly with +X constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113280 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug libgomp/113192] [11/12/13 Regression] ERROR: couldn't execute "../../../gcc/libgomp/testsuite/flock": no such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113192 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression]

[Bug target/113077] [14 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_offset with `-O2 -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113077 --- Comment #7 from Alex Coplan --- After discussing with Richard S (thanks!), I think the problem is using REG_CFA_OFFSET in aarch64_save_callee_saves is too brittle: it is always required to be expressed in terms of the current CFA reg instead

[Bug rtl-optimization/113140] [13/14 regression] segmentation fault during delay slot scheduling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113140 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f34141730266600b615b91d563a85a0b60223b3e commit r14-7028-gf34141730266600b615b91d563a85a0b60223b3e Author: Eric Botcazou Date:

[Bug rtl-optimization/113140] [13/14 regression] segmentation fault during delay slot scheduling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113140 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ddc3fe23ede844454584bc3699f879d3694a382 commit r13-8201-g6ddc3fe23ede844454584bc3699f879d3694a382 Author: Eric Botcazou

[Bug target/113255] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -mtune=k8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113255 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Slightly cleaned up testcase: struct S { unsigned a[10]; unsigned y; unsigned b[6]; } g[2]; __attribute__((noinline, noclone)) int test (int x) { struct S e[2] = { g[0], g[1] }; int r = 0; if (x >= 0

[Bug rtl-optimization/113140] [13/14 regression] segmentation fault during delay slot scheduling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113140 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ada/113195] [13/14 regression] internal error on anonymous access type equality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113195 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ada/113195] [13/14 regression] internal error on anonymous access type equality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113195 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4d3fd59953bcf423dd0859a2c6b95b5260aed71d commit r14-7029-g4d3fd59953bcf423dd0859a2c6b95b5260aed71d Author: Eric Botcazou Date: Tue Jan 9 10:21:51 2024 +0100 Fix internal error

[Bug ada/113195] [13/14 regression] internal error on anonymous access type equality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113195 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13f8c71aebc7df388678c52cffbc11db980d8fa0 commit r13-8202-g13f8c71aebc7df388678c52cffbc11db980d8fa0 Author: Eric Botcazou Date: Tue Jan 9 10:21:51 2024 +0100 Fix internal error

[Bug tree-optimization/113210] [14 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have cond_expr in get_len, at tree.h:6481

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113210 --- Comment #17 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1d4e5b51375efd285378173375d634ad6ba8462 commit r14-7030-gb1d4e5b51375efd285378173375d634ad6ba8462 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/113210] [14 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have cond_expr in get_len, at tree.h:6481

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113210 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/112781] [13/14 regression] internal error on function call returning extension of limited interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112781 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:436ce7a351e0939094592fc12353e17527f1 commit r14-7031-g436ce7a351e0939094592fc12353e17527f1 Author: Eric Botcazou Date: T

[Bug ada/112781] [13/14 regression] internal error on function call returning extension of limited interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112781 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:275de3505e6c5b81bb8060acc5194dac8f5732b5 commit r13-8203-g275de3505e6c5b81bb8060acc5194dac8f5732b5 Author: Eric Botcazou

[Bug ada/112781] [13/14 regression] internal error on function call returning extension of limited interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112781 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f80b9f0904eb98b41913068ce7dc021c2f35ecc commit r14-7032-g8f80b9f0904eb98b41913068ce7dc021c2f35ecc Author: Eric Botcazou Date: T

[Bug libstdc++/113258] Pre-C++17 code that supplies operator new/delete crashes when mixed with post-C+17 code that uses the align_val_t variants of new/delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113258 --- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Nicholas Miell from comment #19) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #17) > > > It's irrelevant whether C++14 has aligned_alloc, since libstdc++ doesn't > > provide that anyway. Wha

[Bug ada/112781] [13/14 regression] internal error on function call returning extension of limited interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112781 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:36ddb5230f56a30317630a928dd73ed46eda03f1 commit r13-8205-g36ddb5230f56a30317630a928dd73ed46eda03f1 Author: Eric Botcazou

[Bug ada/112781] [13/14 regression] internal error on function call returning extension of limited interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112781 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/113280] Strange error for empty inline assembly with +X constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113280 --- Comment #7 from David Brown --- Yes, the goal is an optimisation barrier with the least possible impact on the code. For most uses, asm("" : "+g" (x)) has been ideal, as far as I have tested. Typically it ensures "x" is evaluated in a regi

[Bug target/32344] crash with EH on multiprocessor machines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32344 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/54412] minimal 32-byte stack alignment with -mavx on 64-bit Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54412 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/113255] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -mtune=k8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113255 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug rtl-optimization/113280] Strange error for empty inline assembly with +X constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113280 --- Comment #8 from David Brown --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4) > Nothing has changed here. > > opt == 2 and opt == 3 should use "=X", not "+X", btw. > I realise (since you told me - thanks) that asm ("" : "+X" (x))

[Bug sanitizer/113284] [14 regression] many failures in asan after r14-6946-ge66dc37b299cac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113284 --- Comment #4 from Ilya Leoshkevich --- Thanks, I can repro this on cfarm203 now. Apparently I missed diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc index 94fbf46f2b6..fd9bb807957 100644 --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.

[Bug ada/112958] [14 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112958 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-01-09 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug ada/112342] exception raised when an unexpected ampersand is encountered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112342 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Keywords|

[Bug ada/111945] Attribute Image for Unbounded_String raises UTF_ENCODING.ENCODING_ERROR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111945 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug ada/111813] Inconsistent limit in Ada.Calendar.Formatting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111813 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/104421] The Ada.Directories.Modification_Time procedure does not work for non-ASCII filenames in the Windows environment.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104421 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/104354] ICE with Partition_Elaboration_Policy (Sequential)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104354 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Last rec

[Bug ada/99662] GNAT compiled with the address sanitizer fails at build time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99662 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/95549] [11/12/13/14 regression] gnat1 doesn't link on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95549 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/113280] Strange error for empty inline assembly with +X constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113280 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #6) > From the context given in the gcc-help thread, the goal is to place an > optimization barrier in a sequence of floating-point calculation. "+r" is > ina

[Bug ada/98171] adaint.c doesn't compile on AIX 7.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98171 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Last reco

[Bug sanitizer/113284] [14 regression] many failures in asan after r14-6946-ge66dc37b299cac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113284 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Ilya Leoshkevich from comment #4) > Thanks, I can repro this on cfarm203 now. Apparently I missed > > diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc > index 94fbf46f2b6

[Bug rtl-optimization/113280] Strange error for empty inline assembly with +X constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113280 --- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool --- > But the dump from combine does not make sense: What about this does not make sense to you? > Failed to match this instruction: and then still doing stuff? That is normal. I'll work on making that

[Bug ada/96663] Composite type default 'Read attribute does not perform validity checking for defaulted components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96663 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/113280] Strange error for empty inline assembly with +X constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113280 --- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to David Brown from comment #8) > As for using "=X" in the "opt == 3" case, I worry that that could lead to > errors as the two assembly lines are independent. The first says "put X > anywhe

[Bug ada/96590] testsuite spins forever on test_prio when run as root

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96590 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ada/90051] Error in spec comments - g-caliio.ads (%Z)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90051 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Ever co

[Bug libstdc++/113258] Pre-C++17 code that replaces malloc/free crashes when mixed with post-C++17 code that uses the align_val_t variants of new/delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113258 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Pre-C++17 code that |Pre-C++17 code that

[Bug ada/89097] Ada build broken with long path names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89097 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug middle-end/113163] [14 Regression][GCN] ICE in vect_peel_nonlinear_iv_init, at tree-vect-loop.cc:9420

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113163 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cbf569486b2decbde0308f9f4d0f0837e4cfefd9 commit r14-7036-gcbf569486b2decbde0308f9f4d0f0837e4cfefd9 Author: Tamar Christina Date

[Bug c/113267] pragma novector ICEs when no loop condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113267 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:109f2316725bd74d85279fa749e5ea59686ad320 commit r14-7037-g109f2316725bd74d85279fa749e5ea59686ad320 Author: Tamar Christina Date:

[Bug ada/88943] Compiler switch -gnatceg does not generate C headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88943 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/113163] [14 Regression][GCN] ICE in vect_peel_nonlinear_iv_init, at tree-vect-loop.cc:9420

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113163 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/113267] pragma novector ICEs when no loop condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113267 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/87973] ICE with pragma Discard_Names and GCC optimisation for x64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87973 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-01-09 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug ada/85766] Containing_Directory in Ada.Directories is confused by a trailing separator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85766 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-01-09 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/113077] [14 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_offset with `-O2 -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113077 --- Comment #8 from Alex Coplan --- Initial patch had some fallout, I was missing attaching REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR notes in the ldp/stp pass, testing a revised patch now...

[Bug ada/84142] Implicit_Dereference with Generic Formal Incomplete Types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84142 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/82642] Dynamic predicate for a record should give a warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82642 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/113289] New: Error caused by attribute __always_inline__ in file waitpkgintrin.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113289 Bug ID: 113289 Summary: Error caused by attribute __always_inline__ in file waitpkgintrin.h Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/57659] Failure in installing documentation of gcc-4.7.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57659 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ipa/113197] [14 Regression] ICE in in handle_call_arg, at tree-ssa-structalias.cc:4119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113197 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug ipa/113197] [14 Regression] ICE in in handle_call_arg, at tree-ssa-structalias.cc:4119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113197 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/104354] ICE with Partition_Elaboration_Policy (Sequential)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104354 --- Comment #3 from simon at pushface dot org --- It happens in 12.2.0, doesn’t happen in 13.1.0 or 13.2.0.

[Bug rtl-optimization/113280] Strange error for empty inline assembly with +X constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113280 --- Comment #12 from David Brown --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #11) > (In reply to David Brown from comment #8) > > As for using "=X" in the "opt == 3" case, I worry that that could lead to > > errors as the two assembly lines

[Bug ada/78207] outdated comment outlining wrong edition of REs in g-regexp.ads (GNAT.Regexp) for GNAT.Regpat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78207 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aaa9467618a549608dfe837ef6e0f58581bf3b3a commit r14-7038-gaaa9467618a549608dfe837ef6e0f58581bf3b3a Author: Eric Botcazou Date: Tu

[Bug ada/78207] outdated comment outlining wrong edition of REs in g-regexp.ads (GNAT.Regexp) for GNAT.Regpat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78207 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/113255] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -mtune=k8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113255 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- So this: static void expand_set_or_cpymem_prologue_epilogue_by_misaligned_moves (rtx destmem, rtx srcmem, ... /* See how many bytes we skipped. */ saveddest = expand_simple_binop (GET_MODE (*d

[Bug ada/104354] [12 regression] internal error with Partition_Elaboration_Policy (Sequential)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104354 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Target Milestone|---

[Bug ipa/113197] [14 Regression] ICE in in handle_call_arg, at tree-ssa-structalias.cc:4119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113197 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > Our bisect seed can't bisect lto though... Honza added this stuff.

[Bug libstdc++/113283] missing C++26 freestanding headers.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113283 Arsen Arsenović changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug ada/104354] [12 regression] internal error with Partition_Elaboration_Policy (Sequential)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104354 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b17c2c6cbc34056ae878beed2351bf77a8f57a0 commit r12-10087-g5b17c2c6cbc34056ae878beed2351bf77a8f57a0 Author: Steve Baird D

[Bug ada/104354] [12 regression] internal error with Partition_Elaboration_Policy (Sequential)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104354 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/113026] Bogus -Wstringop-overflow warning on simple memcpy type loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113026 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c22cf7a7a77bf9245bd0790b21695440208c3aa5 commit r14-7039-gc22cf7a7a77bf9245bd0790b21695440208c3aa5 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug target/113289] Error caused by attribute __always_inline__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113289 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org St

[Bug target/113270] [14 Regression] AArch64 ICEs in register_tuple_type since r14-6524

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113270 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:33b1173361b08919ef9011e335072925d38327df commit r14-7040-g33b1173361b08919ef9011e335072925d38327df Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug tree-optimization/113290] New: Optimize dominator updated for peeling with multiple exits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113290 Bug ID: 113290 Summary: Optimize dominator updated for peeling with multiple exits Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug tree-optimization/113290] Optimize dominator updated for peeling with multiple exits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113290 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/28492] -Wmissing-format-attribute points to vsnprintf() or related functions instead of the function that needs the attribute added

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28492 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2012-04-17 00:00:00 |2024-1-9 --- Comment #6 from Manue

[Bug libstdc++/113283] missing C++26 freestanding headers.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113283 --- Comment #6 from cqwrteur --- if someone writes an operating system or libc，he can ensure the abi being the same. Get Outlook for Android From: arsen at gcc dot gnu.org Sent: Tuesday,

[Bug modula2/112920] gm2 hangs in the type resolver

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112920 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e3632a18d1e0b94b4c7b99a512b19c830ed3b228 commit r14-7064-ge3632a18d1e0b94b4c7b99a512b19c830ed3b228 Author: Gaius Mulley Date: Tue

[Bug target/113270] [14 Regression] AArch64 ICEs in register_tuple_type since r14-6524

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113270 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/113199] [14 Regression][GCN] ICE (segfault) due to invalid 'loop_mask_46 = VEC_PERM_EXPR' when compiling Newlib's wcsftime.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113199 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80bb94e88faaadd4d6f008fececb46214dc89e9f commit r14-7065-g80bb94e88faaadd4d6f008fececb46214dc89e9f Author: Tamar Christina Date:

[Bug middle-end/113199] [14 Regression][GCN] ICE (segfault) due to invalid 'loop_mask_46 = VEC_PERM_EXPR' when compiling Newlib's wcsftime.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113199 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/113290] Optimize dominator updated for peeling with multiple exits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113290 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Keywords|

[Bug ada/112958] [14 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112958 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou --- > The code is the same on the 13 branch though, does it compile there? So far, I had only tried gcc 11.4.0 (where the code compiles) and trunk (

[Bug libstdc++/113283] missing C++26 freestanding headers.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113283 --- Comment #7 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Arsen Arsenović from comment #5) > C does not have a freestanding error.h, indeed. > > We were considering making up some numbers in a high-up range so that we can > provide some non-OS-provided err

[Bug tree-optimization/113290] Optimize dominator updated for peeling with multiple exits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113290 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- int a[77]; int bar (); void foo () { int val; #define LOOP \ val = bar (); \ for (int i = 0; i < 77; ++i) \ { \ if (a[i] == val) \ break; \ a[i]++; \ } #define LOOP10 LOOP

[Bug sanitizer/113284] [14 regression] many failures in asan after r14-6946-ge66dc37b299cac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113284 --- Comment #6 from Ilya Leoshkevich --- Created attachment 57014 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57014&action=edit patch v2 Thanks for the correction. I've noticed the function label and got tunnel vision; .opd does indee

[Bug ipa/113291] New: [14 Regression] compilation never (?) finishes with recursive always_inline functions at -O and above

3-20240109134751-gab6224dfe12-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 14.0.0 20240109 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug modula2/112920] gm2 hangs in the type resolver

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112920 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

  1   2   3   >