https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110167
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
It's also very bad for code size, so yes, a loopy implementation is very
much prefered even for a much smaller threshold than 1024!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110170
--- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu ---
void __cond_swap(double* __x, double* __y) {
bool __r = (*__x < *__y);
*__x = __r ? *__y : *__x ;
}
void __cond_swap1(double* __x, double* __y) {
bool __r = (*__x < *__y);
*__y = __r ? *__x : *__y;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110170
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110176
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110178
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96024
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4cf6e322adc19f927859e0a5edfa93cec4b8c844
commit r14-1642-g4cf6e322adc19f927859e0a5edfa93cec4b8c844
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110182
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110126
--- Comment #8 from Thorsten Otto ---
And here are examples that trigger the bug:
DEFINITION MODULE BIOS;
FROM SYSTEM IMPORT ADDRESS, CARDINAL32, INTEGER16, INTEGER32;
END BIOS.
IMPLEMENTATION MODULE BIOS;
PROCEDURE trap_13_w(n: INTEGER16):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96024
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32c51d0911e8d1bdf3f60bc831794b7932416ccd
commit r13-7431-g32c51d0911e8d1bdf3f60bc831794b7932416ccd
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110188
Bug ID: 110188
Summary: gcc for RISC-V stack aligned error
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110185
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110188
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is at -O0. Maybe -O1 or -O2 will use the reduced stack size.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96024
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bc4adb88611cb17280ab15ac4e13ab1d05b11825
commit r12-9687-gbc4adb88611cb17280ab15ac4e13ab1d05b11825
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96024
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f875e435b23dfb439bc7784cade4aebbd5d4a69
commit r11-10850-g7f875e435b23dfb439bc7784cade4aebbd5d4a69
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96024
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f46b16ef25fec4f936724ca449259db5c3de0f54
commit r10-11441-gf46b16ef25fec4f936724ca449259db5c3de0f54
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110188
--- Comment #2 from 18761437418 at 163 dot com ---
thank you very much,
I have tried different optimization levels, but all occupy 32bytes.
O0, O1, O2, O3, Os all occupy 32bytes.
comand: riscv64-unknown-elf-gcc -c main.c -o main.o -march=rv32ima
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110189
Bug ID: 110189
Summary: Using an unknown TYPE as argument to VAL gives ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110188
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
According to riscv.h there is a difference between ABI and calling conventions:
/* The smallest supported stack boundary the calling convention supports. */
#define STACK_BOUNDARY \
(riscv_abi == ABI_IL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110044
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46e585c5c3f8ea81c163e1d7db044a972bc29321
commit r13-7432-g46e585c5c3f8ea81c163e1d7db044a972bc29321
Author: Iain Sandoe
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110044
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d64b55db0bec62873503739fabc2a4d3219ad58
commit r12-9688-g8d64b55db0bec62873503739fabc2a4d3219ad58
Author: Iain Sandoe
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110044
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92293d71135f8a4ad4097e971122ce3153de73a8
commit r11-10851-g92293d71135f8a4ad4097e971122ce3153de73a8
Author: Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110044
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dfbf62f87824ac2bd40222bd9c1cbc8d65875a9c
commit r10-11442-gdfbf62f87824ac2bd40222bd9c1cbc8d65875a9c
Author: Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110190
Bug ID: 110190
Summary: regex: incorrect match results on DFA engines
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96024
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110044
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106907
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by jeevitha :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b09a5453114fee10b0f0984793ce968503dbea7
commit r12-9689-g3b09a5453114fee10b0f0984793ce968503dbea7
Author: Jeevitha Palanisamy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52799
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ec1d76a359542ed4c8370390efa9ee9e25e757f
commit r14-1645-g3ec1d76a359542ed4c8370390efa9ee9e25e757f
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109886
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor ---
A buildbot run which checked out this revision unfortunately still reports this
problem with UBSAN-bootstrapped compiler.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110182
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
commit 3e12669a0eb968cfcbe9242b382fd8020935edf8 (origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Author: Richard Biener
Date: Fri Jun 9 09:29:09 2023 +0200
middle-end/110182 - TYPE_PRECISION on VECTOR_TYPE causes wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110191
Bug ID: 110191
Summary: Alias template in function parameter does not match
the nested type it refers to
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110187
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||87403
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110186
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59974
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102445
Bug 102445 depends on bug 103664, which changed state.
Bug 103664 Summary: std::regex_replace bug if the string contains \0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103664
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103664
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110185
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110192
Bug ID: 110192
Summary: Missed GIMPLE optimization with calls
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110182
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12 Regression]
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110192
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
tail merging is supposed to handle this but ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110077
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I'm testing this fix:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/floating_from_chars.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/floating_from_chars.cc
@@ -1325,7 +1325,8 @@ _ZSt10from_charsPKcS0_RDF128_St12chars_format(const char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110148
cuilili changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lili.cui at intel dot com
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109800
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d3b72cbbfe7fb38b0e3b8ef2119156cbce57488
commit r11-10852-g2d3b72cbbfe7fb38b0e3b8ef2119156cbce57488
Author: Alex Coplan
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59974
--- Comment #6 from Stephen Kitt ---
The patches were written by Jeff Epler, not me, so I can't assign copyright or
sign off.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109800
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110108
--- Comment #9 from Benji Smith ---
Yes, updated to the latest trunk (dac73e4c64bf62be18bd5203e4e0f3e6bc64b4dc) and
confirmed that it no longer repros. Thanks for the fix!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110167
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:960de5dd886572711ef86fa1e15e30d3810eccb9
commit r14-1647-g960de5dd886572711ef86fa1e15e30d3810eccb9
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110149
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:628ba410b9265dbd4278c1f1b1fadf05348adef2
commit r14-1648-g628ba410b9265dbd4278c1f1b1fadf05348adef2
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108410
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, for the case we can use the same mask compare type as we use as type for
the IV (so we know we can represent all required values) we can elide the
saturation. So for example
void foo (double * __rest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100285
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:793ed718b522b15e2d758eca953feeec1979fe2c
commit r14-1650-g793ed718b522b15e2d758eca953feeec1979fe2c
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100285
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #12)
> This is failing for aarch64-none-elf:
>
> FAIL: experimental/net/headers.cc (test for excess errors)
I hope this one is fixed on trunk now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110149
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on trunk so far, backport to follow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110145
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110137
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|jwakely at redha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107815
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110077
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00da6bcfccbc5ab13821d8dd7334dd48c22d5702
commit r14-1651-g00da6bcfccbc5ab13821d8dd7334dd48c22d5702
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110077
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110168
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101789
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fchelnokov at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110191
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110188
--- Comment #4 from 18761437418 at 163 dot com ---
thank you very much.
according to the define, STACK_BOUNDARY is 8 bytes, ABI_STACK_BOUNDARY is 128,
just 16bytes, not 32bytes, but compiler allocate 32bytes to stack.
At 2023-06-09
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110193
Bug ID: 110193
Summary: d_signed_or_unsigned_type is invoked for vector types
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109886
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #9)
> A buildbot run which checked out this revision unfortunately still reports
> this problem with UBSAN-bootstrapped compiler.
Oh, I see.. there's a second prob
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110194
Bug ID: 110194
Summary: GCC shouldn't warn for inline functions when -G
provided.
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110188
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kito at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110194
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109886
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #9)
> A buildbot run which checked out this revision unfortunately still reports
> this problem with UBSAN-bootstrapped compiler.
Actually, I do not think that rang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110194
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110194
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also -G and -g are different options. I was thinking you saying gcc should not
warn when you specify the small data size on some targets (-G).
Oh -g is independent from optimization level too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110194
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, I think -Og only does early inlining and not IPA inlining, so it will
inline far fewer functions than -O1, -O2, -Os etc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110165
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72e652f3425079259faa4edefe1dc571f72f91e0
commit r14-1653-g72e652f3425079259faa4edefe1dc571f72f91e0
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110166
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72e652f3425079259faa4edefe1dc571f72f91e0
commit r14-1653-g72e652f3425079259faa4edefe1dc571f72f91e0
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97711
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:55fcaa9a8bd9c8ce97ca929fc902c88cf92786a0
commit r14-1656-g55fcaa9a8bd9c8ce97ca929fc902c88cf92786a0
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110155
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:55fcaa9a8bd9c8ce97ca929fc902c88cf92786a0
commit r14-1656-g55fcaa9a8bd9c8ce97ca929fc902c88cf92786a0
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110194
--- Comment #5 from Umesh Kalappa ---
Ok thank you @Jakub and @Andrew for the quick reply ,
>>-Winline
Option triggers this diagnostic ,so it better not to use this option in the
debug build ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110166
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110165
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.0
Summary|[13/14 Regressi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110155
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97711
Bug 97711 depends on bug 110155, which changed state.
Bug 110155 Summary: Missing if conversion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110155
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97711
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the committed patch only fixes f in comment #1. g (Pointer plus) will need
another change.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96868
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f8f1dee851c23bce19977b2531cf69b4da9f88f
commit r14-1657-g0f8f1dee851c23bce19977b2531cf69b4da9f88f
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39589
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f8f1dee851c23bce19977b2531cf69b4da9f88f
commit r14-1657-g0f8f1dee851c23bce19977b2531cf69b4da9f88f
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110194
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110185
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97988
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101677
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12944
Bug 12944 depends on bug 97988, which changed state.
Bug 97988 Summary: [C++20] Forward-declared class type declared inside
requires-expression gives weird inconsistencies
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97988
What|Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110108
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110192
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> tail merging is supposed to handle this but ...
VOPs IIRC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110163
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
It is a regression for rv64. So probably P4 would be most appropriate.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110193
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110195
Bug ID: 110195
Summary: defaulted constructor does not respect the private
accessor
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95906
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110195
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110195
--- Comment #2 from jack ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Before C++20, Single{} didn't call the constructor so this behavior is
> expected.
Could you explain why it didn't call the constructor before c++20? C++ standard
rules
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21278
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-08-18 00:00:00 |2023-6-9
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110102
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35d2c40e4ac9ba57ae82e4722e557a2028d0cf13
commit r14-1658-g35d2c40e4ac9ba57ae82e4722e557a2028d0cf13
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110185
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:953bbeaeff050f4d0b670568a587aa1ce82ed711
commit r14-1660-g953bbeaeff050f4d0b670568a587aa1ce82ed711
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110196
Bug ID: 110196
Summary: stacktrace_entry does not print origin binary filename
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo