https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96868
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek <mpola...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f8f1dee851c23bce19977b2531cf69b4da9f88f commit r14-1657-g0f8f1dee851c23bce19977b2531cf69b4da9f88f Author: Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> Date: Thu Jun 8 13:52:11 2023 -0400 doc: Clarification for -Wmissing-field-initializers The manual is incorrect in saying that the option does not warn about designated initializers, which it does in C++. Whether the divergence in behavior is desirable is another thing, but let's at least make the manual match the reality. PR c/39589 PR c++/96868 gcc/ChangeLog: * doc/invoke.texi: Clarify that -Wmissing-field-initializers doesn't warn about designated initializers in C only.
