https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103155
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97403
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
> Martin,
> I think we can close this (possibly adding the testcase)
Depends. ANCESTOR got generalized a bit but the propagation at IPA-CP level
still does not take
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86491
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
A variable declared 'static' has internal linkage, and so does a variable in an
anonymous namespace, which is probably the source of the mix-up in GCC's
warning.
N.B. your names like _C_ have undefined beh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103126
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:249b4eeef1fe30237acb4d8e1832243b39d61e7e
commit r12-5084-g249b4eeef1fe30237acb4d8e1832243b39d61e7e
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Nov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103126
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97403
--- Comment #4 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97403
>
> --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
> > Martin,
> > I think we can close this (possibly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103165
Bug ID: 103165
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE unspellable token PRAGMA since
r12-4797-g0078a058a5693871
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102690
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86491
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jason Vas Dias from comment #4)
> I see now I should have used 'extern C c_', and defined it in tM.C.
Or give the whole template internal linkage.
>
> But actually, in the context in which i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103165
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103166
Bug ID: 103166
Summary: [12 regression] wrong dependency on getentropy on
newlib-based targets
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103164
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
IPA PTA disables local re-computation of PTA info after inlining. There must
be also some pessimization around not computing a function-local escaped
solution since that's used to keep stores to "globals"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102906
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102690
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #7)
> So can we XFAIL it in the meantime, especially on the 11 branch?
Let me do that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103165
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
--- Comment #30 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb161782545224f55ba26ba663889c5e6e9a04d1
commit r12-5102-gfb161782545224f55ba26ba663889c5e6e9a04d1
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49244
--- Comment #27 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb161782545224f55ba26ba663889c5e6e9a04d1
commit r12-5102-gfb161782545224f55ba26ba663889c5e6e9a04d1
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102906
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102906
>
> Aldy Hernandez changed:
>
>What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103166
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-10
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103166
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103164
--- Comment #2 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
Yep, it only shows that we want to run ipa-pta and local oracle in
parallel since ipa-pta can not be realistically assumed to subsume all
of local PTA (for example due to being necessarily l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59246
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last reconfirmed|2013-11-2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102906
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102906
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102906
>
> Aldy Hernandez changed:
>
>What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102906
--- Comment #16 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #15)
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > @@ -60,6 +63,24 @@ should_duplicate_loop_header_p (basic_block header, class
> > loop *loop,
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102690
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2cd32b743ba440e75505ce30c6b5c592ed144ea
commit r12-5107-gb2cd32b743ba440e75505ce30c6b5c592ed144ea
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102690
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3dea90505df136a4b361665772ef8e62306cfcdb
commit r11-9233-g3dea90505df136a4b361665772ef8e62306cfcdb
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61808
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-10
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102690
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||xfail
Priority|P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102906
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102906
>
> --- Comment #16 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103164
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
We need to resolve issues around the fake UIDs PTA allocates though, those make
both solutions "incompatible" since for example a malloc stmt result is getting
a new UID each PTA run. So when you intersect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103164
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
See allocate_decl_uid calls in PTA.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102906
--- Comment #18 from Defunct account. Do not use. ---
> Yes. I guess it would be nice to have a CTOR or so for the case
> where the path is really a single edge like in this case.
Good idea. Will do.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66671
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-10
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
Bug ID: 103167
Summary: UBSAN error since
g:05f40bc4c116ba48843728201bc7290a5e518598
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
> And one more related ASAN error related to the same revision:
This one is also UBSAN error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
And the last one I see:
UBSAN error: /home/mliska/Programming/binutils-gdb/libbacktrace/elf.c:3178:26:
The following fails when I build binutils with:
configure --build=x86_64-linux --disable-gdb --disable-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> /home/mliska/Programming/binutils-gdb/libbacktrace/elf.c:3178:26: runtime
> error: left shift of 163 by 24 places cannot be represented in type 'int'
diff --git
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> /home/mliska/Programming/binutils-gdb/libbacktrace/xztest.c:175:13: runtime
> error: null pointer passed as argument 2, which is declared to never be null
diff -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103168
Bug ID: 103168
Summary: Value numbering of pure functions can be improved
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103168
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
Sorry the testcase should have pure in it
__attribute__((pure)) int test();
int
main()
{
int ret;
int a[10];
for (int i=0; i<10;i++)
if (test())
a[i]++;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103169
Bug ID: 103169
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error:
definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block
4)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102690
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ---
> XFAILed. I still think the diagnostic should be fixed.
This works fine on the 11 branch, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103170
Bug ID: 103170
Summary: ICE: output_operand: incompatible floating point /
vector register operand for '%s'
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90400
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #6)
> Created attachment 51700 [details]
> Draft patch for the 'gcc -E' / 'gcc -save-temps' issue
>
> This solves the -E / -save-temps preprocessing issue.
>
> For th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80fe172ba9820199c2bbce5d0611ffca27823049
commit r12-5108-g80fe172ba9820199c2bbce5d0611ffca27823049
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103133
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80fe172ba9820199c2bbce5d0611ffca27823049
commit r12-5108-g80fe172ba9820199c2bbce5d0611ffca27823049
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100117
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:77963796aef8aa07993c0bc757c15848fab7432a
commit r12-5109-g77963796aef8aa07993c0bc757c15848fab7432a
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:77963796aef8aa07993c0bc757c15848fab7432a
commit r12-5109-g77963796aef8aa07993c0bc757c15848fab7432a
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100117
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103042
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0cf6065ce4997774de66db4de83d461013e0f0e1
commit r12-5112-g0cf6065ce4997774de66db4de83d461013e0f0e1
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103133
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on trunk, backports needed too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103171
Bug ID: 103171
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since
r12-2523-g13586172d0b70c9d
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103171
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever conf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103165
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Simpler to read example:
#define inner(...) #__VA_ARGS__ _Pragma("GCC diagnostic pop")
#define outer(...) inner(__VA_ARGS__)
outer(inner(1,2))
the expected result is something like:
"\"1,2\" _Pragm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102906
--- Comment #19 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 51757
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51757&action=edit
proposed patch in testing
Patch depends on some shuffling in the path solver to make way for non-threader
cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67762
--- Comment #8 from Curdeius Curdeius ---
A different (rather small) reproduce.
https://godbolt.org/z/bz9sTd34o
It fails with all the versions of gcc from at least 7 (the above code needs
`auto` in template non-type parameter) to trunk from 2021
Hi,
This list is mostly just a bugzilla feed and so isn't widely monitored.
If you're confident the behaviour is a bug then it would be better to
file a bugzilla ticket. If you're not sure and want to double-check
what the correct behaviour is then it'd be better to ask on gcc-help.
Thanks,
Rich
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103169
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-10
Summary|[12 Regres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103051
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||willschm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103169
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Andrew, are you planning sending a patch candidate for this, please?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> Andrew, are you planning sending a patch candidate for this, please?
I doubt it, I have so many other things on my plate right now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99911
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99911
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That isn't valid though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102892
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101940
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1ad0d84d7fcbcaa7a697290387b911eb7e1bd46
commit r12-5123-ga1ad0d84d7fcbcaa7a697290387b911eb7e1bd46
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103130
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] \*/ is |[11/12 Regression] \*/ is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101940
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101757
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102711
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
> I see - probably makes sense since that subtly changes post-dominators
> for backwards unreachable regions which reflects back on control
> dependence. But there's nothing "wrong" here, I think it avoided
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101680
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71740
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103172
Bug ID: 103172
Summary: ICE in gfc_check_init_expr, at fortran/expr.c:3014
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103172
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96727
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wileamyp at outlook dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103172
--- Comment #2 from Wileam Yonatan Phan ---
Comment on attachment 51758
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51758
Source code for minimal reproducer
>function assumed_rank_crash ( arr ) result( res )
> implicit none
>
> ! Arg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103051
Will Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162
--- Comment #7 from Florin Iucha ---
That is most unfortunate because it will force us to duplicate the library used
for resource management. Not only that, but if I were to implement the
pmr::memory_resource interface in terms of the other libr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103057
--- Comment #5 from Dennis Lubert ---
Created attachment 51759
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51759&action=edit
cvise generated compling testcase
This one is pretty big but compiles with -w but ICEs without it. Differently
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103057
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] Internal |[11/12 Regression] Internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99911
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103173
Bug ID: 103173
Summary: strncpy output may be truncated copying 32 bytes from
a string of length 1439 (bogus)
[-Werror=stringop-truncation]
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102892
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102892
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102892
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> Fixed on master with r12-4790-g4b3a325f07acebf4.
Wadayaknow...I fixed it and didn't even know it :)
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Florin Iucha from comment #7)
> There are uses for the memory_resources pattern, outside of its current
> application in the standard library - for example allocating ranges in a
> file, or in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Florin Iucha from comment #2)
> It indicates that it reports errors via exceptions.
Yes, but that doesn't mean 0 is a valid return value. The non-nothrow forms of
operator new also use except
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162
--- Comment #10 from Florin Iucha ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> > There are uses for the memory_resources pattern, outside of its current
> > application in the standard library - for example allocating ranges in a
> > file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I'm going to get the standard clarified instead (and then cppreference will
probably follow suit).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162
--- Comment #12 from Florin Iucha ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> (In reply to Florin Iucha from comment #2)
> > It indicates that it reports errors via exceptions.
>
> Yes, but that doesn't mean 0 is a valid return value. T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103162
--- Comment #13 from Florin Iucha ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11)
> I'm going to get the standard clarified instead (and then cppreference will
> probably follow suit).
That will be great!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102232
navidrahimi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51752|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102232
--- Comment #6 from navidrahimi ---
Created attachment 51760
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51760&action=edit
[PATCH] PR tree-optimization/102232 Adding a missing pattern to match.pd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |testsuite
--- Comment #5 from Martin Seb
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
