https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102711
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > I see - probably makes sense since that subtly changes post-dominators > for backwards unreachable regions which reflects back on control > dependence. But there's nothing "wrong" here, I think it avoided > placing the fake exit edges at the infinite loop headers as opposed > to the latch but I don't remember exactly. Do we still need more bisection?