https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99375
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97236
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Arfrever.FTA at GMail dot Com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99378
Bug ID: 99378
Summary: ICE in decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:6710
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99363
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99369
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99020
--- Comment #5 from simon at pushface dot org ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #4)
> This should compile now.
It does, indeed. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99372
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |11.0
Component|tree-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99369
--- Comment #2 from G. Steinmetz ---
The threshold value (ok|ICE) could maybe vary depending on the environment.
Therefore, it is best to try z1_63.f90 (the last example given).
On CE it produces a buffer overflow with trunk:
https://godbolt.or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99369
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99373
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99379
Bug ID: 99379
Summary: lambda declared with deduced type 'auto' can appear in
its own initializer
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99379
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
I find this:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25693676/auto-variable-used-in-lambda-in-its-own-initializer
So this is not a bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99360
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
CC|
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: boris at kolpackov dot net
Target Milestone: ---
A change between 11.0.0 20210217 and 11.0.1 20210304 causes an unexpected
MODULE-EXPORT request when partially
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99051
--- Comment #1 from Boris Kolpackov ---
As of 11.0.1 20210304 (f3641ac70e) this no longer reproduces for me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99360
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 50297
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50297&action=edit
Stopgap fix
To be applied on the 11 branch only.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98760
--- Comment #2 from Boris Kolpackov ---
This still reproduces as of 11.0.1 20210304 (f3641ac70e) though the location
has changed:
hello.cxx:18:25: internal compiler error: in lookup_mark, at cp/tree.c:2403
18 | o << format_he
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99360
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81866
--- Comment #9 from Sokolov Viacheslav ---
Looks like it is fixed on trunk along with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96474
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99378
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99376
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Sanitizer detects undefined |Sanitizer detects undefined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99381
Bug ID: 99381
Summary: SVE: ICE with ACLE intrinsics when missing
-march=armv8.2-a+sve
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99376
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99382
Bug ID: 99382
Summary: Address sanitizer detects stack-buffer-overflow in
stl_construct.h
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99376
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Clearly a pair of tests against HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT is missing in:
>
> if (result_width < mode_width)
> nonzero &= (HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << result_width) - 1;
>
> if (result_low > 0)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99383
Bug ID: 99383
Summary: No tree-switch-conversion under PIC
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70094
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|ebotcazou at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99384
Bug ID: 99384
Summary: Unoptimized tailcall with char and short as parameter
(x86)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99375
--- Comment #2 from Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis ---
I confirm that backporting of GCC commit
1ab88985631dd2c5a5e3b5c0dce47cf8b6ed2f82
(https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ab88985631dd2c5a5e3b5c0dce47cf8b6ed2f82) to GCC 10.2.0
fixes this problem (also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99382
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99383
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99382
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99383
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99385
Bug ID: 99385
Summary: [11 regression]
gcc.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof-malloc.c etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99385
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99383
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
For the specific case of strings switch-conversion could also generate
a combined string (with intermediate '\0's) and use a table of
offsets into said string, thus doing a single relocation to the
combined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99382
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:905ce0ca30cb33cddf024b0aebf4ba0b2c86fe77
commit r11-7503-g905ce0ca30cb33cddf024b0aebf4ba0b2c86fe77
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99385
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97855
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f232f782e6e4954370ac63ba6e40ad554c0cf942
commit r11-7504-gf232f782e6e4954370ac63ba6e40ad554c0cf942
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97855
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99382
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99385
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99374
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99374
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It seems more likely (i.e. very likely) to be caused by r241944 instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99374
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99385
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
> Thanks for the report and the analysis.
> The code should not segfault as we do:
>
> if (ptr != MAP_FAILED)
> {
> __gcov_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99385
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
I see, that's expected behavior from the test-case then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99385
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c955b4ad37cf31c1d7cfa146c2b3ead2042869b
commit r11-7505-g4c955b4ad37cf31c1d7cfa146c2b3ead2042869b
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99385
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99195
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Using a define_subst like:
(define_subst "add_vec_concat_subst"
[(set (match_operand:VDMOV 0 "" "")
(match_operand:VDMOV 1 "" ""))]
"!BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN"
[(set (match_operand: 0 "regi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Note that after r11-7501 the test in comment O gives cat run time:
% gfc pr57871.f90 -freal-4-real-16
% ./a.out
kind(1.0_p1) 4 precision(1.0_p1) 6
kind(1.0_dp) 8 precis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97090
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #11 from David Malcolm ---
> Re comment #10: I just tested unknown-fns-4.c and malloc-vs-local-1b.c 500
> times each on a --target=i386-pc-solaris2.11 build using the scri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99355
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99345
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
Created attachment 50298
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50298&action=edit
source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99345
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
One also needs the files generating the needed modules.
Does the code compiles with -fno-frontend-optimize?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99345
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
also seen with -fno-frontend-optimize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99386
Bug ID: 99386
Summary: std::variant overhead much larger compared to clang
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99345
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
So yes, we'll need all the files loaded as modules.
@doko: Can you please tar the entire folder?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99355
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99170
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c778a237c1c605c2c5606c212c1ace756739442b
commit r11-7506-gc778a237c1c605c2c5606c212c1ace756739442b
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99170
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99355
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|dominiq at lps dot ens.fr |
--- Comment #10 from Domi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99386
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Is that clang++ using libstdc++ from GCC or libc++? In the end the difference
might boil down to inlining decision differences.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99386
--- Comment #2 from Milian Wolff ---
in both cases libstdc++ is being used:
```
gcc:
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7ffdc9f93000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x7f1449b2d000)
libm.so.6 => /usr/lib/libm.so.6 (0x0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99170
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9553c8a1b9dd2ca2f0f30d8b23fc6844c7e4a223
commit r11-7509-g9553c8a1b9dd2ca2f0f30d8b23fc6844c7e4a223
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99386
--- Comment #3 from Milian Wolff ---
Ah, seems like `-O2 -flto` fixes the issue for me, but how come clang can pull
this off without LTO?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35014
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99355
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8)
> r11-7501 changed the output of the test in comment O, is this expected?
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10)
> % gfc pr57871.f90
I am sli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99386
--- Comment #4 from Milian Wolff ---
Ah, but LTO only helps with the variant that contains a single type. The
variant with two types remains very slow:
variant with single type:
```
Performance counter stats for './variant 1' (5 runs):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99355
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus ---
Additional patch – my need some cleanup & check whether the
other flags agree with the description. However, it should
match the implementation:
--- a/gcc/fortran/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/fortran/invoke.texi
@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99194
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99122
--- Comment #24 from Martin Jambor ---
*** Bug 99194 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99341
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the glibc side:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=f0419e6a10740a672b28e112c409ae24f5e890ab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99352
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99381
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a6bc1680a493de356d6a381718021c6a44401201
commit r11-7510-ga6bc1680a493de356d6a381718021c6a44401201
Author: Alex Coplan
Date: Thu Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99387
Bug ID: 99387
Summary: ICE when mixing CNTTP with deduction guides
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99381
--- Comment #2 from Alex Coplan ---
Fixed on trunk. Needs backporting to GCC 10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99355
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I have changed the test in pr57871 comment 0 to
implicit none
integer,parameter:: p1 = 4, dp = kind(1d0)
print *,'kind(1.0_4) ',kind(1.0_4),'precision(1.0_4) ',precision(1.0_4)
print *,'kind(1.0_p1)'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99381
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99386
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
See PR 78113 and PR 86912
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99388
Bug ID: 99388
Summary: Invalid debug info for __fp16
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99216
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99388
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-04
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99388
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The above patch changes:
--- pr99388.s 2021-03-04 15:47:31.151944020 +0100
+++ pr99388.s 2021-03-04 15:51:51.404086604 +0100
@@ -267,18 +267,21 @@ foo:
.byte 0x4 // uleb128 0x4; Location exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99325
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1b56c3ef70036af6d171d61ea48ad4c368fcb5b
commit r11-7511-ga1b56c3ef70036af6d171d61ea48ad4c368fcb5b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88146
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c9816196328a4f4b927f08cf2f66cf255849da0b
commit r11-7512-gc9816196328a4f4b927f08cf2f66cf255849da0b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99362
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c9816196328a4f4b927f08cf2f66cf255849da0b
commit r11-7512-gc9816196328a4f4b927f08cf2f66cf255849da0b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99325
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99362
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] invalid |[10 Regression] invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99387
--- Comment #1 from Omer Rosler ---
Simplified example:
https://godbolt.org/z/b814o7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95636
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99347
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qianchao9 at huawei dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99105
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6a8fc0c31a9ae759fe9bf59b5418abf2af938f91
commit r11-7513-g6a8fc0c31a9ae759fe9bf59b5418abf2af938f91
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99105
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener ---
There's another thing - we end up with
vmovq %rax, %xmm3
vpinsrq $1, %rdx, %xmm3, %xmm0
but that has way worse latency than the alternative you'd get w/o SSE 4.1:
vmovq %rax,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99383
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That was an intentional change, see the PR.
With -fPIC/-fPIE, when the switch isn't optimized into a table of values but
kept as a switch, it doesn't need runtime relocations on many targets. Just
try to com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99383
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Combining the separate strings into a single one if they have the same length
and aren't many would have the disadvantage that the returned value then
wouldn't be pointer equal to constant literal containing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99352
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
rs6000 has check_effective_target_powerpc_fprs already (with slightly
different semantics).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99355
--- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #13)
> I have changed the test in pr57871 comment 0 to [...]
> It is not the result I expect.
Does the patch of comment 11 produce the expected result?
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
