https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94092
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021, bina2374 at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94092
>
> --- Comment #11 from Mel Chen ---
> (In reply to Mel Chen from comment #10)
> > (In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99342
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99343
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-03
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99345
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99347
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99350
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99355
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |10.2.0
--- Comment #2 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99339
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The stdarg pass already performs similar analysis, see e.g.
reachable_at_most_once function, because if those aren't used in loops and
escape, it computes not just whether the function uses some fp or gpr arg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99085
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ad5b1915d50cc39691487f58794d699c7900ace
commit r11-7471-g4ad5b1915d50cc39691487f58794d699c7900ace
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99090
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b5040344b9ca609e19ee59ba56cd4af9697a1692
commit r11-7472-gb5040344b9ca609e19ee59ba56cd4af9697a1692
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99324
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba09d11a9d0ae2382bab715b102a7746d20dea6d
commit r11-7473-gba09d11a9d0ae2382bab715b102a7746d20dea6d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98656
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:186573a26a19e6e6523d86739248953042735372
commit r10-9404-g186573a26a19e6e6523d86739248953042735372
Author: Tom de Vries
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99085
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE: |[10 Regression] ICE:
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99090
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99324
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE |[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98656
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99321
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1b13064609a41fcaf4d1859663453bba237e277
commit r11-7474-gf1b13064609a41fcaf4d1859663453bba237e277
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99356
Bug ID: 99356
Summary: Recursive std::shared_future:s with
std::launch::deferred sporadically deadlock
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99355
--- Comment #3 from Nick ---
Yes, real*4 -> real*16.
I agree that the option semantics are not clear. However, the documentation
says:
Promote all REAL(KIND=M) entities to REAL(KIND=N) entities. If REAL(KIND=N) is
unavailable, then an error wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99314
--- Comment #2 from Sinan Lin ---
(In reply to Kito Cheng from comment #1)
> I didn't see this testcase failed before, and I can't reproduce that on my
> work environment, do you mind share your build environment, e.g. the version
> of gcc or the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99357
Bug ID: 99357
Summary: Missed Dead Code Elimination Opportunity
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99357
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-03
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99358
Bug ID: 99358
Summary: Ada2020 target assignment operator as return value
triggers bug box
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97897
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9272936ac5fac472a3690145572afa6ed19eaa8e
commit r10-9405-g9272936ac5fac472a3690145572afa6ed19eaa8e
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98526
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4f0d8562af81709db39d783dd2bf98af28ec
commit r10-9406-g4f0d8562af81709db39d783dd2bf98af28ec
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98640
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:268b54382e5248ee1a5e3f4a0841358e03290d17
commit r10-9407-g268b54382e5248ee1a5e3f4a0841358e03290d17
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98758
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:85977f624a34eac309f9d77a58164553dfc82975
commit r10-9408-g85977f624a34eac309f9d77a58164553dfc82975
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97897
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.2.1
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98526
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98640
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99358
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81986
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
r11-7470 fixes the first runtime error, but I still see
../../../work/libgfortran/io/write.c:835:7: runtime error: negation of
0x8000 cannot be represented in type '__int12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99234
--- Comment #24 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:357c4350680bf29f0c7a115424e3da11c53b5582
commit r11-7475-g357c4350680bf29f0c7a115424e3da11c53b5582
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99234
--- Comment #25 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2939b358936bb824330888def98ad848dea41483
commit r10-9409-g2939b358936bb824330888def98ad848dea41483
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99234
--- Comment #26 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d57d8bb5c528397e8fc21f82f098ad96568ea67f
commit r9-9261-gd57d8bb5c528397e8fc21f82f098ad96568ea67f
Author: Eric Botcazou
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99359
Bug ID: 99359
Summary: Unexpected result of the allocation status when the
allocatable variable has been deallocated
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99360
Bug ID: 99360
Summary: ICE in generalized iteration
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98528
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
> Any update?
At least on Solaris, the failures are gone since 20210113.
However, gcc-testresults still shows similar failures for
i586-unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99101
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99102
--- Comment #3 from Joel Hutton ---
Seems like the 'vect' pass is vectorizing a 'MASK_STORE' to a 'SCATTER_STORE'
and ignoring the mask.
1292 testcase.c:7:29: note: vect_is_simple_use: operand 0, type of def:
constant$
1293 testcase.c:7:29: not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99344
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c4f0c0ceb346e7deb69a44688faab6103aa57da
commit r11-7477-g8c4f0c0ceb346e7deb69a44688faab6103aa57da
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99344
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98528
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
do you have preprocessed source for those other failing platforms? my guess is
they have different system headers, particularly around threading?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98528
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
> do you have preprocessed source for those other failing platforms? my guess
> is
> they have different system headers, particularly around th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461
--- Comment #27 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00d79dc4be0b86ec564cfa2b32c47de6c07449e6
commit r11-7479-g00d79dc4be0b86ec564cfa2b32c47de6c07449e6
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98528
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99356
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is probably due to PR 97949 again, because shared_future uses call_once
internally.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95675
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:74aee6d20872e8d87558eb5bf601042e3ed3fb2a
commit r11-7481-g74aee6d20872e8d87558eb5bf601042e3ed3fb2a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99101
--- Comment #22 from Michael Matz ---
Over the last days I came to a similar conclusion. Control dependence as
defined
with postdoms doesn't capture the number of invocations of an instruction, just
wether it's invoked at all. I.e. paths with a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384
--- Comment #22 from Patrick Palka ---
Thanks for the heads up. Continued execution FAILs on Darwin and AIX even
after the most recent patches is certainly unexpected :( I hope to analyze and
address this soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99101
--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener ---
Just for the record we had the idea to apply the "bolt" of marking the latch
control dependence (as done for possibly infinite loops) for loops containing
stmts with side-effects.
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99355
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99359
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461
--- Comment #30 from Martin Liška ---
> CCing some folks familiar with Windows, while Martin has committed a mmap
> based solution, I think it will not work on Windows, but
Note the libgcov still falls back to malloc. So if there's not a custom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99009
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1dabbfb0f4a9fbdc77e1ea4db7302586f00895e1
commit r11-7483-g1dabbfb0f4a9fbdc77e1ea4db7302586f00895e1
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97034
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1dabbfb0f4a9fbdc77e1ea4db7302586f00895e1
commit r11-7483-g1dabbfb0f4a9fbdc77e1ea4db7302586f00895e1
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99361
Bug ID: 99361
Summary: "unused variable" warning on a used variable in
template lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97034
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92002
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa6092d2cdc654d4b2e018929c0dbe13fbd4ea69
commit r11-7484-gfa6092d2cdc654d4b2e018929c0dbe13fbd4ea69
Author: Rainer Orth
Date: Wed M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98593
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92002
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82959
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b8fa12015f717ac7e4fe2ffbad96a0cb0df2584
commit r11-7485-g0b8fa12015f717ac7e4fe2ffbad96a0cb0df2584
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82959
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461
Liu Hao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lh_mouse at 126 dot com
--- Comment #31 from L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99009
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99362
Bug ID: 99362
Summary: invalid unused result
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99362
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99362
--- Comment #2 from gcc at cookiesoft dot de ---
it's not my code, but a MCVE ;)
I'm using
[tomlplusplus](https://github.com/marzer/tomlplusplus/blob/master/toml.hpp) and
there the constructor is marked as nodiscard.
I may file an issue there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99314
--- Comment #3 from Kito Cheng ---
Thanks for providing environment info, I'll try that soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99363
Bug ID: 99363
Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/attr-flatten-1.c fails starting
with r11-7469
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99325
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 50293
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50293&action=edit
gcc11-pr99325.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99341
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99363
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99361
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99273
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99018
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99364
Bug ID: 99364
Summary: Regression: loops not optimized to count to 0/-1
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99362
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99365
Bug ID: 99365
Summary: ICE on partial specialization with constrained
placeholder NTTP
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
URL: https://godbolt.org/z/nxTEaW
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99366
Bug ID: 99366
Summary: Partial specialization with constrained placeholder
NTTP is not more specialized
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
URL: https://godbolt.org/z/ETjYfP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99367
Bug ID: 99367
Summary: missing warning on constructing/destroying class
objects in insufficient space
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99368
Bug ID: 99368
Summary: ICE in build_function_decl, at
fortran/trans-decl.c:2381
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99369
Bug ID: 99369
Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_expr, at
fortran/resolve.c:7167
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99370
Bug ID: 99370
Summary: calling a virtual function in insufficient space
silently folded to __builtin_unreachable
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99337
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d6177870dd2696501e3b8d3930fd5549d4acaeae
commit r11-7492-gd6177870dd2696501e3b8d3930fd5549d4acaeae
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Wed Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93235
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99337
--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw ---
Thanks, committed, and I'll apply it to gcc-10 and gcc-9 as well, as they have
the same condition.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96894
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Analyzer assumes pointer is |State explosion on gdb's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99364
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22041
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stefan at franke dot ms
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99362
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99370
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The problem is since this transformation is done during optimization, it could
be done on a path that is not executed at all. This is why
-fsanitize=undefined/-fsanitize=unreachable should be used if you wan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99170
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:499193a692efa33c9b2fe3ad8da0f4d5e5fd0e0c
commit r11-7493-g499193a692efa33c9b2fe3ad8da0f4d5e5fd0e0c
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99371
Bug ID: 99371
Summary: add_options_for_sqrt_insn is missing options that
enable powerpc's fsqrt
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99372
Bug ID: 99372
Summary: gimplefe-28.c ICEs when sqrt insn is not available
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99362
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99101
--- Comment #24 from Jan Hubicka ---
I do not think there is problem with pdom for cyclic WRT acyclic paths. Both
notions are equivalent here.
If you have instruction I in, say, header of a loop and you determine it live
then the condition cont
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99365
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on partial |[11 Regression] ICE on
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo