https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99360
Bug ID: 99360
Summary: ICE in generalized iteration
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: simon at pushface dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50292
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50292&action=edit
Reproducer
This is a regression from GCC 10.
It arises when compiling a generalized iteration (in the case of the
bug box below, 'for Cursor in V.Iterate loop', also for existential &
universal quantifiers) against an independently-developed arm-eabi
RTS[1]. It does *not* happen against f.e. ravenscar-full-stm32f4.
This is the result of compiling with the native compiler against the
set of files reported by the arm-eabi compiler (attached):
$ gnatmake -c -u -f iteration.adb
gcc -c iteration.adb
+===========================GNAT BUG DETECTED==============================+
| 11.0.0 20210205 (experimental) (x86_64-apple-darwin15) Program_Error
sem_ch8.adb:5490 explicit raise|
| Error detected at iteration.adb:13:8 |
| Please submit a bug report; see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ . |
| Use a subject line meaningful to you and us to track the bug. |
| Include the entire contents of this bug box in the report. |
| Include the exact command that you entered. |
| Also include sources listed below. |
+==========================================================================+
Please include these source files with error report
Note that list may not be accurate in some cases,
so please double check that the problem can still
be reproduced with the set of files listed.
Consider also -gnatd.n switch (see debug.adb).
system.ads
iteration.adb
ada.ads
a-contai.ads
a-cobove.ads
a-iteint.ads
a-stream.ads
a-tags.ads
s-stoele.ads
s-secsta.ads
s-parame.ads
s-taskin.ads
s-freert.ads
interfac.ads
s-fretas.ads
s-stratt.ads
s-unstyp.ads
What investigation I've been able to do suggests that it's possibly
related to tasking and/or finalization being brought in when not
needed (it used not to be with GCC 10).
Emmanuel B. (ex-AdaCore) said in [2]:
Might be unrelated, but: we have noticed recently that a
generalized iteration ("for..of") was wrongly calling
`activate_task`. In particular, this resulted in errors when
executing such loops from a protected object and enabling the
checks that no potentially blocking operation is executed in such
contexts.
We reported this to AdaCore who fixed it in their more recent
wavefronts. I am not sure when the error started to occur though,
so maybe not that helpful to you :-)
----
[1] https://github.com/simonjwright/cortex-gnat-rts
[2] https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.ada/c/c5qncqgkgYk/m/Cp-mty5wAgAJ
